School engagement and resilience in bullied indigenous adolescents: a strengths-based analysis of a longitudinal study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Connie Lam, Md Irteja Islam, Tuguy Esgin, Alexandra Martiniuk
{"title":"School engagement and resilience in bullied indigenous adolescents: a strengths-based analysis of a longitudinal study.","authors":"Connie Lam, Md Irteja Islam, Tuguy Esgin, Alexandra Martiniuk","doi":"10.1177/17579759251355518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to utilise a strengths-based approach to investigate whether Indigenous Australian adolescents with affective engagement in their schooling and education are more resilient, and if this resilience from affective engagement in school contributes to predict the negative consequences associated with bullying at school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study comprised 490 Indigenous adolescents aged 11-16 years from four Footprints in Time: The Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC) waves (W8, W10, W11 and W12 - conducted between 2014 and 2019) of the 'Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children' dataset. In this study, Generalised Linear Models (GLMs) were employed to examine whether affective school engagement (independent variable) was associated with the outcome variable - the study child's resilience (measured by the validated Strong Souls Resilience subscale) and whether it varied by child's exposure to bullying victimisation. All models were adjusted for potential sociodemographic covariates (i.e. age, sex, location and socioeconomic position).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 490 participants analysed, 89.4% (<i>n</i> = 438) had high affective school engagement, 37.8% (<i>n</i> = 185) were not bullied and the mean resilience score was 19.41 (SD = 5.21). Bivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in median resilience score between two categories of school engagement (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Longitudinal analysis using GLMs showed that high affective school engagement is a positive predictor of the study child's resilience (<i>p</i> = 0.013) compared with those with low school engagement. Affective school engagement was found to be associated with resilience only among those who were bullied compared with their counterparts (<i>p</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that affective school engagement predicts resilience in Australian Indigenous adolescents. Affective school engagement may also serve as a protective factor for adolescents who have been bullied, potentially mitigating some of the harmful mental health outcomes linked with bullying. These findings underscore the potential for programmes that may promote affective school engagement in future initiatives to improve education inequities that cause health disparities for Indigenous peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"17579759251355518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759251355518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study aims to utilise a strengths-based approach to investigate whether Indigenous Australian adolescents with affective engagement in their schooling and education are more resilient, and if this resilience from affective engagement in school contributes to predict the negative consequences associated with bullying at school.

Methods: The current study comprised 490 Indigenous adolescents aged 11-16 years from four Footprints in Time: The Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children (LSIC) waves (W8, W10, W11 and W12 - conducted between 2014 and 2019) of the 'Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children' dataset. In this study, Generalised Linear Models (GLMs) were employed to examine whether affective school engagement (independent variable) was associated with the outcome variable - the study child's resilience (measured by the validated Strong Souls Resilience subscale) and whether it varied by child's exposure to bullying victimisation. All models were adjusted for potential sociodemographic covariates (i.e. age, sex, location and socioeconomic position).

Results: Of the 490 participants analysed, 89.4% (n = 438) had high affective school engagement, 37.8% (n = 185) were not bullied and the mean resilience score was 19.41 (SD = 5.21). Bivariate analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in median resilience score between two categories of school engagement (p = 0.002). Longitudinal analysis using GLMs showed that high affective school engagement is a positive predictor of the study child's resilience (p = 0.013) compared with those with low school engagement. Affective school engagement was found to be associated with resilience only among those who were bullied compared with their counterparts (p = 0.039).

Conclusions: This study found that affective school engagement predicts resilience in Australian Indigenous adolescents. Affective school engagement may also serve as a protective factor for adolescents who have been bullied, potentially mitigating some of the harmful mental health outcomes linked with bullying. These findings underscore the potential for programmes that may promote affective school engagement in future initiatives to improve education inequities that cause health disparities for Indigenous peoples.

受欺负土著青少年的学校参与与心理韧性:一项纵向研究的优势分析。
目的:本研究旨在利用基于优势的方法来调查在学校和教育中有情感参与的澳大利亚土著青少年是否更有弹性,以及这种来自学校情感参与的弹性是否有助于预测与学校欺凌相关的负面后果。方法:本研究包括490名11-16岁的土著青少年,他们来自“时间足迹”的四个足迹:“土著儿童纵向研究”数据集的土著儿童纵向研究(LSIC)波(W8、W10、W11和W12 -在2014年至2019年期间进行)。在本研究中,采用广义线性模型(GLMs)来检验情感学校参与(自变量)是否与结果变量-研究儿童的弹性(通过验证的强灵魂弹性子量表测量)相关,以及它是否因儿童遭受欺凌而变化。所有模型都针对潜在的社会人口学协变量(即年龄、性别、地理位置和社会经济地位)进行了调整。结果:在分析的490名参与者中,89.4% (n = 438)具有高情感学校投入,37.8% (n = 185)没有被欺负,平均弹性得分为19.41 (SD = 5.21)。双变量分析显示,两类学校投入在弹性中位数得分上存在显著差异(p = 0.002)。使用GLMs进行的纵向分析显示,与学校投入低的儿童相比,高情感学校投入是研究儿童心理弹性的积极预测因子(p = 0.013)。与被欺负的学生相比,只有被欺负的学生的情感学校投入与心理弹性有关(p = 0.039)。结论:本研究发现,情感学校参与可以预测澳大利亚土著青少年的心理弹性。对遭受欺凌的青少年来说,情感性的学校参与也可能是一种保护因素,有可能减轻与欺凌有关的一些有害的心理健康后果。这些研究结果强调,在未来改善导致土著人民健康差异的教育不公平现象的举措中,有可能制定方案,促进学校的有效参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信