Stefano Alvarenga Galliano, Matheo Augusto Morandi Stumpf, Nara L Queiroz, Eduardo Henrique Rodrigues Ferreira, Flora Ladeira Craveiro, Christiane Gruetzmacher, Gilberto Ochman da Silva, Valter Angelo Sperling Cescato, Eduardo Arnaldo Silva Vellutini, Malebranche Berardo Carneiro Cunha-Neto, Rafael Loch Batista, Andrea Glezer
{"title":"A new and useful tool for differentiating prolactinomas from non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a pilot study of the cabergoline disconnection test.","authors":"Stefano Alvarenga Galliano, Matheo Augusto Morandi Stumpf, Nara L Queiroz, Eduardo Henrique Rodrigues Ferreira, Flora Ladeira Craveiro, Christiane Gruetzmacher, Gilberto Ochman da Silva, Valter Angelo Sperling Cescato, Eduardo Arnaldo Silva Vellutini, Malebranche Berardo Carneiro Cunha-Neto, Rafael Loch Batista, Andrea Glezer","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical, imaging, and laboratory differentiation between non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) and prolactinomas can be challenging in clinical practice because of their similar presentation and eventual overlap in prolactin levels. The degree of prolactin suppression after a single low-dose cabergoline administration may be useful as a test to discriminate between these two clinical conditions and to determine the choice of therapy (dopamine agonist versus neurosurgery).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 19 patients with macroadenomas (11 NFPAs and 8 prolactinomas) whose prolactin levels were evaluated at baseline and 48 h after receiving a single dose of 0.25mg cabergoline. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for sensitivity and specificity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline median prolactin level was 58ng/mL (range, 32.5-151.2ng/mL) in the NFPA Group, which was significantly lower than that observed in the Prolactinoma Group (733.7 [range, 180-6941ng/mL]) (p<0.001). After the cabergoline disconnection test, the NFPA Group exhibited a lower absolute prolactin level (p<0.001) and a higher percentage of prolactin reduction (p=0.004). The post-test prolactin level ≥26.3ng/mL had 100% sensitivity and specificity in identifying prolactinomas. When using the percentage of reduction, post-test prolactin reduction ≥85.6% had 54.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity to differentiate NFPAs from prolactinomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single low-dose oral cabergoline is a fast and inexpensive test for use in daily clinical practice to discriminate between hyperprolactinemia due to NFPAs and prolactinomas, with high sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"23 ","pages":"eAO1694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Clinical, imaging, and laboratory differentiation between non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) and prolactinomas can be challenging in clinical practice because of their similar presentation and eventual overlap in prolactin levels. The degree of prolactin suppression after a single low-dose cabergoline administration may be useful as a test to discriminate between these two clinical conditions and to determine the choice of therapy (dopamine agonist versus neurosurgery).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 19 patients with macroadenomas (11 NFPAs and 8 prolactinomas) whose prolactin levels were evaluated at baseline and 48 h after receiving a single dose of 0.25mg cabergoline. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for sensitivity and specificity analyses.
Results: The baseline median prolactin level was 58ng/mL (range, 32.5-151.2ng/mL) in the NFPA Group, which was significantly lower than that observed in the Prolactinoma Group (733.7 [range, 180-6941ng/mL]) (p<0.001). After the cabergoline disconnection test, the NFPA Group exhibited a lower absolute prolactin level (p<0.001) and a higher percentage of prolactin reduction (p=0.004). The post-test prolactin level ≥26.3ng/mL had 100% sensitivity and specificity in identifying prolactinomas. When using the percentage of reduction, post-test prolactin reduction ≥85.6% had 54.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity to differentiate NFPAs from prolactinomas.
Conclusion: A single low-dose oral cabergoline is a fast and inexpensive test for use in daily clinical practice to discriminate between hyperprolactinemia due to NFPAs and prolactinomas, with high sensitivity and specificity.