A new and useful tool for differentiating prolactinomas from non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a pilot study of the cabergoline disconnection test.

IF 0.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1694
Stefano Alvarenga Galliano, Matheo Augusto Morandi Stumpf, Nara L Queiroz, Eduardo Henrique Rodrigues Ferreira, Flora Ladeira Craveiro, Christiane Gruetzmacher, Gilberto Ochman da Silva, Valter Angelo Sperling Cescato, Eduardo Arnaldo Silva Vellutini, Malebranche Berardo Carneiro Cunha-Neto, Rafael Loch Batista, Andrea Glezer
{"title":"A new and useful tool for differentiating prolactinomas from non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a pilot study of the cabergoline disconnection test.","authors":"Stefano Alvarenga Galliano, Matheo Augusto Morandi Stumpf, Nara L Queiroz, Eduardo Henrique Rodrigues Ferreira, Flora Ladeira Craveiro, Christiane Gruetzmacher, Gilberto Ochman da Silva, Valter Angelo Sperling Cescato, Eduardo Arnaldo Silva Vellutini, Malebranche Berardo Carneiro Cunha-Neto, Rafael Loch Batista, Andrea Glezer","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical, imaging, and laboratory differentiation between non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) and prolactinomas can be challenging in clinical practice because of their similar presentation and eventual overlap in prolactin levels. The degree of prolactin suppression after a single low-dose cabergoline administration may be useful as a test to discriminate between these two clinical conditions and to determine the choice of therapy (dopamine agonist versus neurosurgery).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 19 patients with macroadenomas (11 NFPAs and 8 prolactinomas) whose prolactin levels were evaluated at baseline and 48 h after receiving a single dose of 0.25mg cabergoline. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for sensitivity and specificity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline median prolactin level was 58ng/mL (range, 32.5-151.2ng/mL) in the NFPA Group, which was significantly lower than that observed in the Prolactinoma Group (733.7 [range, 180-6941ng/mL]) (p<0.001). After the cabergoline disconnection test, the NFPA Group exhibited a lower absolute prolactin level (p<0.001) and a higher percentage of prolactin reduction (p=0.004). The post-test prolactin level ≥26.3ng/mL had 100% sensitivity and specificity in identifying prolactinomas. When using the percentage of reduction, post-test prolactin reduction ≥85.6% had 54.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity to differentiate NFPAs from prolactinomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single low-dose oral cabergoline is a fast and inexpensive test for use in daily clinical practice to discriminate between hyperprolactinemia due to NFPAs and prolactinomas, with high sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"23 ","pages":"eAO1694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinical, imaging, and laboratory differentiation between non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) and prolactinomas can be challenging in clinical practice because of their similar presentation and eventual overlap in prolactin levels. The degree of prolactin suppression after a single low-dose cabergoline administration may be useful as a test to discriminate between these two clinical conditions and to determine the choice of therapy (dopamine agonist versus neurosurgery).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 19 patients with macroadenomas (11 NFPAs and 8 prolactinomas) whose prolactin levels were evaluated at baseline and 48 h after receiving a single dose of 0.25mg cabergoline. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for sensitivity and specificity analyses.

Results: The baseline median prolactin level was 58ng/mL (range, 32.5-151.2ng/mL) in the NFPA Group, which was significantly lower than that observed in the Prolactinoma Group (733.7 [range, 180-6941ng/mL]) (p<0.001). After the cabergoline disconnection test, the NFPA Group exhibited a lower absolute prolactin level (p<0.001) and a higher percentage of prolactin reduction (p=0.004). The post-test prolactin level ≥26.3ng/mL had 100% sensitivity and specificity in identifying prolactinomas. When using the percentage of reduction, post-test prolactin reduction ≥85.6% had 54.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity to differentiate NFPAs from prolactinomas.

Conclusion: A single low-dose oral cabergoline is a fast and inexpensive test for use in daily clinical practice to discriminate between hyperprolactinemia due to NFPAs and prolactinomas, with high sensitivity and specificity.

鉴别泌乳素瘤和无功能垂体腺瘤的新工具:卡麦角林断连试验的初步研究。
目的:无功能垂体腺瘤(nfpa)和催乳素瘤的临床、影像学和实验室鉴别在临床实践中具有挑战性,因为它们的表现相似,最终催乳素水平重叠。单次低剂量卡麦角林给药后的催乳素抑制程度可能有助于区分这两种临床情况,并确定治疗的选择(多巴胺激动剂还是神经外科手术)。方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括19例大腺瘤患者(11例nfpa和8例催乳素瘤),在基线和接受单剂量0.25mg卡麦角林48小时后评估催乳素水平。生成受试者工作特征曲线进行敏感性和特异性分析。结果:NFPA组基线催乳素中位水平为58ng/mL(范围32.5 ~ 151.2ng/mL),显著低于泌乳素瘤组(733.7[范围180 ~ 6941ng/mL])。结论:单次低剂量口服卡麦角林是一种快速、廉价的检测方法,可用于日常临床实践中区分NFPA所致的高催乳素血症和催乳素瘤,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信