{"title":"Incidence of primary graft dysfunction and its associated risk factors after lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jing Pan, Jiejuan Zhang, Xiali Lu","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03129-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis evaluates the prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and its risk factors after lung transplantation (LT). We searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) up until May, 2024. STATA 16 was used for data analysis. Random or fixed effects models were used to summarize the prevalence of PGD and associated risk factors according to statistical tests for heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 61 studies with 59,865 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of grade 2 and grade 3 PGD was 27% (95% CI 0.19, 0.34) and 18% (0.16, 0.21), respectively. Donor-related risk factors included older age (OR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.58), female gender (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.13, 2.48), and smoking history (OR = 1.84; 1.47, 2.30). Recipient factors were female gender (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.32, 1.74), higher BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.11, 1.33), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.64, 2.63), and pulmonary hypertension (OR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.50, 3.21). Operative risks included higher reperfusion FiO<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.01, 1.23), prolonged ischemic time (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.05), and cardiopulmonary bypass use (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.79, 3.16). This study highlights the donor, recipient, and operative factors contributing to PGD risk, and emphasizes the need for targeted strategies in high-risk populations and further mechanistic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03129-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis evaluates the prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and its risk factors after lung transplantation (LT). We searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) up until May, 2024. STATA 16 was used for data analysis. Random or fixed effects models were used to summarize the prevalence of PGD and associated risk factors according to statistical tests for heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 61 studies with 59,865 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of grade 2 and grade 3 PGD was 27% (95% CI 0.19, 0.34) and 18% (0.16, 0.21), respectively. Donor-related risk factors included older age (OR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.00, 1.58), female gender (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.13, 2.48), and smoking history (OR = 1.84; 1.47, 2.30). Recipient factors were female gender (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.32, 1.74), higher BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.11, 1.33), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.64, 2.63), and pulmonary hypertension (OR = 2.19; 95% CI 1.50, 3.21). Operative risks included higher reperfusion FiO2 (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.01, 1.23), prolonged ischemic time (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.05), and cardiopulmonary bypass use (OR = 2.38; 95% CI 1.79, 3.16). This study highlights the donor, recipient, and operative factors contributing to PGD risk, and emphasizes the need for targeted strategies in high-risk populations and further mechanistic research.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.