"It just feels morally not right to Sell the data": Ethical and social perspectives on human genomic data sharing in Uganda-A phenomenological qualitative study.

IF 2.2 Q2 ETHICS
Deborah Ekusai-Sebatta, David Kyaddondo, David Kaawa-Mafigiri, John Barugahare, Jimmy Spire Ssentongo, Shenuka Singh, Erisa Mwaka
{"title":"\"It <i>just feels morally not right</i> to Sell the data\": Ethical and social perspectives on human genomic data sharing in Uganda-A phenomenological qualitative study.","authors":"Deborah Ekusai-Sebatta, David Kyaddondo, David Kaawa-Mafigiri, John Barugahare, Jimmy Spire Ssentongo, Shenuka Singh, Erisa Mwaka","doi":"10.1177/17470161251361575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While genomic data sharing enhances transparency and research efficiency, it also raises significant ethical and social challenges. This study explored stakeholders' perspectives on these issues, particularly around privacy, confidentiality, and equity in collaborative research. A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2023 at Makerere University College of Health Sciences, other research-intensive institutions, and national regulatory bodies. The study engaged 86 participants: 47 key informants (16 researchers, 14 ethics committee members, nine community advisory board members, and eight research regulators) and four deliberative focus group discussions with 39 participants. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 14. Three major themes emerged: (1) stakeholders' experiences in genomic research, including their roles as participants, implementers, or overseers; (2) ethical concerns, such as informed consent, third-party data access, inequities between high-income and low- and middle-income country (LMIC) researchers and participants, and the lack of benefit-sharing frameworks; and (3) social implications, including stigma, discrimination, labeling, community perceptions of fairness, and the need for meaningful engagement. Participants emphasized the importance of protecting participant rights, promoting equity, and ensuring robust data governance and security. The theoretical frameworks of principlism and distributive justice provided a valuable lens for examining these concerns, particularly by highlighting the need to safeguard privacy and fairly distribute responsibilities and benefits in global collaborations. Participants also noted that perceptions of fairness are shaped by trust, local context, and past experiences with research factors that are critical for building equitable and respectful partnerships. This study underscores the urgent need to strengthen protections for research participants and promote fairness in genomic data sharing. Policies should, if adopted, emphasize culturally contextualized consent, active community engagement, restricted third-party data access, and strong data protection mechanisms to address existing inequities and prevent misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251361575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While genomic data sharing enhances transparency and research efficiency, it also raises significant ethical and social challenges. This study explored stakeholders' perspectives on these issues, particularly around privacy, confidentiality, and equity in collaborative research. A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between August and December 2023 at Makerere University College of Health Sciences, other research-intensive institutions, and national regulatory bodies. The study engaged 86 participants: 47 key informants (16 researchers, 14 ethics committee members, nine community advisory board members, and eight research regulators) and four deliberative focus group discussions with 39 participants. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 14. Three major themes emerged: (1) stakeholders' experiences in genomic research, including their roles as participants, implementers, or overseers; (2) ethical concerns, such as informed consent, third-party data access, inequities between high-income and low- and middle-income country (LMIC) researchers and participants, and the lack of benefit-sharing frameworks; and (3) social implications, including stigma, discrimination, labeling, community perceptions of fairness, and the need for meaningful engagement. Participants emphasized the importance of protecting participant rights, promoting equity, and ensuring robust data governance and security. The theoretical frameworks of principlism and distributive justice provided a valuable lens for examining these concerns, particularly by highlighting the need to safeguard privacy and fairly distribute responsibilities and benefits in global collaborations. Participants also noted that perceptions of fairness are shaped by trust, local context, and past experiences with research factors that are critical for building equitable and respectful partnerships. This study underscores the urgent need to strengthen protections for research participants and promote fairness in genomic data sharing. Policies should, if adopted, emphasize culturally contextualized consent, active community engagement, restricted third-party data access, and strong data protection mechanisms to address existing inequities and prevent misuse.

“出售数据在道德上是不对的”:乌干达人类基因组数据共享的伦理和社会视角——现象学定性研究。
虽然基因组数据共享提高了透明度和研究效率,但它也引发了重大的伦理和社会挑战。本研究探讨了利益相关者对这些问题的看法,特别是在合作研究中的隐私、保密和公平方面。2023年8月至12月期间,在马凯雷雷大学卫生科学学院、其他研究密集型机构和国家监管机构进行了一项现象学定性研究。该研究涉及86名参与者:47名关键信息提供者(16名研究人员,14名伦理委员会成员,9名社区咨询委员会成员和8名研究监管机构)和4个审议焦点小组讨论,共有39名参与者。访谈逐字记录,并使用NVivo 14进行专题分析。主要有三个主题:(1)利益相关者在基因组研究中的经验,包括他们作为参与者、实施者或监督者的角色;(2)伦理问题,如知情同意、第三方数据访问、高收入国家和中低收入国家(LMIC)研究人员和参与者之间的不平等,以及缺乏利益分享框架;(3)社会影响,包括污名、歧视、标签、社区对公平的看法,以及对有意义参与的需求。与会者强调了保护参与者权利、促进公平以及确保稳健的数据治理和安全的重要性。原则和分配正义的理论框架为研究这些问题提供了一个有价值的视角,特别是通过强调在全球合作中保护隐私和公平分配责任和利益的必要性。与会者还指出,对公平的看法受到信任、当地情况和过去的研究经验的影响,这些因素对建立公平和尊重的伙伴关系至关重要。这项研究强调了加强对研究参与者的保护和促进基因组数据共享公平性的迫切需要。政策应强调文化背景下的同意、积极的社区参与、限制第三方数据访问和强有力的数据保护机制,以解决现有的不公平现象和防止滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信