Construct Validity of the Perceived Stress Scale 4 in a Norwegian Adult ADHD Community Population.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Henrik Pedersen, Tatiana Skliarova, Stian Lydersen, Hege Hafstad, Audun Havnen, Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera
{"title":"Construct Validity of the Perceived Stress Scale 4 in a Norwegian Adult ADHD Community Population.","authors":"Henrik Pedersen, Tatiana Skliarova, Stian Lydersen, Hege Hafstad, Audun Havnen, Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera","doi":"10.1111/sjop.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress is a potential risk factor for other serious health concerns. Studies show an association between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and stress due to impairments in emotional regulation and executive functioning that are typical of the disorder. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is among the most widely used measures of perceived stress, and its four-item version (PSS-4) lacks validation in Norwegian contexts. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the PSS-4 in an adult ADHD sample, to facilitate effective and valid measurements of perceived stress in this population. A total of 423 adults with ADHD were recruited through a Norwegian user involvement organization. Confirmatory factor analysis with a two- and a one-factor model was applied. Gradually, more restricted models were evaluated in terms of model fit and compared with each other to test measurement invariance across sexes. Pearson correlations were calculated for the association with related constructs. Our results favored the two-factor model, which demonstrated a good fit, over the one-factor model. Our results indicated that the PSS-4 posits measurement invariance across sexes at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. All correlations aligned with expected directions and strengths. These results indicate that the Norwegian PSS-4 posits good construct and structural validity, and measurement invariance across sexes in this population. In sum, our results support the use of the PSS-4 as a short and valid measure of perceived stress among adults with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress is a potential risk factor for other serious health concerns. Studies show an association between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and stress due to impairments in emotional regulation and executive functioning that are typical of the disorder. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is among the most widely used measures of perceived stress, and its four-item version (PSS-4) lacks validation in Norwegian contexts. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the PSS-4 in an adult ADHD sample, to facilitate effective and valid measurements of perceived stress in this population. A total of 423 adults with ADHD were recruited through a Norwegian user involvement organization. Confirmatory factor analysis with a two- and a one-factor model was applied. Gradually, more restricted models were evaluated in terms of model fit and compared with each other to test measurement invariance across sexes. Pearson correlations were calculated for the association with related constructs. Our results favored the two-factor model, which demonstrated a good fit, over the one-factor model. Our results indicated that the PSS-4 posits measurement invariance across sexes at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. All correlations aligned with expected directions and strengths. These results indicate that the Norwegian PSS-4 posits good construct and structural validity, and measurement invariance across sexes in this population. In sum, our results support the use of the PSS-4 as a short and valid measure of perceived stress among adults with ADHD.

感知压力量表4在挪威成人ADHD社区人群中的建构效度。
压力是其他严重健康问题的潜在风险因素。研究表明,注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)与压力之间存在关联,这是由于典型的情绪调节和执行功能受损。感知压力量表(PSS)是最广泛使用的感知压力测量方法之一,其四项版本(PSS-4)在挪威环境中缺乏有效性。本研究旨在评估PSS-4在成人ADHD样本中的结构效度,以促进有效和有效地测量该人群的感知压力。共有423名患有多动症的成年人通过挪威用户参与组织被招募。采用两因子模型和一因子模型进行验证性因子分析。逐渐地,更多的受限制的模型在模型拟合方面进行评估,并相互比较,以检验不同性别的测量不变性。计算与相关构念之间的Pearson相关性。我们的结果倾向于双因素模型,它证明了良好的拟合,而不是单因素模型。结果表明,PSS-4在结构、度量和标量水平上具有性别间的测量不变性。所有的相关性都与预期的方向和优势一致。这些结果表明挪威PSS-4具有良好的结构效度和结构效度,并且在该人群中具有性别不变性。总之,我们的结果支持使用PSS-4作为ADHD成人感知压力的一种简短而有效的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信