Acute Stress Enhanced Healthy Young Males' Inhibitory Control of Avoidance Behavior to Negative Scenes.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Guangya Wang, Jiajing Yuan, Xiurong Hao, Xindi Shi, Zhouqian Yin, Xiaoyun Ji, Shijia Li
{"title":"Acute Stress Enhanced Healthy Young Males' Inhibitory Control of Avoidance Behavior to Negative Scenes.","authors":"Guangya Wang, Jiajing Yuan, Xiurong Hao, Xindi Shi, Zhouqian Yin, Xiaoyun Ji, Shijia Li","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maladaptive responses to approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) are common in various stress-related disorders. Acute stress exerts complex effects on approach/avoidance motivation and inhibitory control, both of which are critical for AAC resolution and influenced by prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation. To investigate the impact of acute stress on AAC related to emotional scenes, 53 healthy male participants completed a scene approach-avoidance task (AAT) after either the Maastricht Acute Stress Test or a control procedure, with functional near-infrared spectroscopy data of the PFC collected during the AAT. Participants also rated their approach-avoidance tendencies toward the scenes posttask. The stress manipulation was successful. In the control group, the compatibility effect was observed, with significantly lower accuracy for approaching negative scenes compared to avoiding negative scenes and approaching positive scenes. However, this compatibility effect was absent in the stress group. The stress group made fewer errors than the control group when approaching negative scenes. As there were no group differences in the approach-avoidance tendency ratings, we speculated that acute stress enhances inhibitory control rather than altering motivation. Stress deactivated the PFC during approaching negative scenes, indicating a limited role of top-down processing in AAC resolution. Additionally, in the stress group, reaction times were longer for avoiding negative scenes compared to avoidances to positive ones, reflecting the poststress freeze-like response. These findings provide behavioral and neural signatures of the effects of acute stress on responses to AAC, offering potential evidence for the early identification of acute stress and stress-related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 9","pages":"e70152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maladaptive responses to approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) are common in various stress-related disorders. Acute stress exerts complex effects on approach/avoidance motivation and inhibitory control, both of which are critical for AAC resolution and influenced by prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation. To investigate the impact of acute stress on AAC related to emotional scenes, 53 healthy male participants completed a scene approach-avoidance task (AAT) after either the Maastricht Acute Stress Test or a control procedure, with functional near-infrared spectroscopy data of the PFC collected during the AAT. Participants also rated their approach-avoidance tendencies toward the scenes posttask. The stress manipulation was successful. In the control group, the compatibility effect was observed, with significantly lower accuracy for approaching negative scenes compared to avoiding negative scenes and approaching positive scenes. However, this compatibility effect was absent in the stress group. The stress group made fewer errors than the control group when approaching negative scenes. As there were no group differences in the approach-avoidance tendency ratings, we speculated that acute stress enhances inhibitory control rather than altering motivation. Stress deactivated the PFC during approaching negative scenes, indicating a limited role of top-down processing in AAC resolution. Additionally, in the stress group, reaction times were longer for avoiding negative scenes compared to avoidances to positive ones, reflecting the poststress freeze-like response. These findings provide behavioral and neural signatures of the effects of acute stress on responses to AAC, offering potential evidence for the early identification of acute stress and stress-related disorders.

急性应激增强健康青年男性对消极场景回避行为的抑制控制。
方法回避冲突(AAC)的适应不良反应在各种压力相关疾病中很常见。急性应激对趋近/回避动机和抑制控制具有复杂的影响,这两者都是AAC解决的关键,并受前额叶皮质(PFC)激活的影响。为了研究急性应激对与情绪场景相关的AAC的影响,53名健康男性参与者在马斯特里赫特急性应激测试或对照程序后完成了场景接近-回避任务(AAT),并在AAT期间收集了PFC的功能近红外光谱数据。参与者还评估了他们对任务后场景的接近回避倾向。压力控制是成功的。在对照组中,存在相容性效应,接近消极场景的准确率明显低于回避消极场景和接近积极场景的准确率。然而,应激组不存在这种相容性效应。在面对消极场景时,压力组比对照组犯的错误更少。由于在接近-回避倾向评分上没有组间差异,我们推测急性应激增强抑制控制而不是改变动机。在接近消极场景时,压力使PFC失活,表明自上而下的加工在AAC分辨率中的作用有限。此外,在压力组中,避免消极场景的反应时间比避免积极场景的反应时间要长,这反映了压力后的冻结反应。这些发现提供了急性应激对AAC反应影响的行为和神经特征,为早期识别急性应激和应激相关疾病提供了潜在的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信