A response to the Vancouver call for action: addressing the needs of early career scientists in radiation protection.

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Ämilie L Degenhardt, Patrizia Kunert, Viktoria Herzner, Sehajpreet Gill, Nazanin Love, Jad Abuhamed, Giorgia Stendardo, Kim Lea Sennhenn, Warren A John, Prabal Subedi
{"title":"A response to the Vancouver call for action: addressing the needs of early career scientists in radiation protection.","authors":"Ämilie L Degenhardt, Patrizia Kunert, Viktoria Herzner, Sehajpreet Gill, Nazanin Love, Jad Abuhamed, Giorgia Stendardo, Kim Lea Sennhenn, Warren A John, Prabal Subedi","doi":"10.1007/s00411-025-01145-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early career researchers, professionals, and scientists (ECRs) are essential to the future of radiation protection, a field that increasingly relies on interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation. In line with the principles outlined in the Vancouver Call for Action for Radiation Protection Researchers, an ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) initiative, this article explores the current landscape for ECRs through the lens of survey data, initiative outcomes, and the establishment of the Early Career in Radiation Protection Network (ECRad). Drawing on a Europe-wide survey of 47 ECRs, the study identifies key areas of concern: while there is strong intrinsic motivation to remain in the field, perceived feasibility is often hampered by job insecurity, fragmented institutional support, and lack of structured mentorship. Although most respondents participate in existing networks such as ICRP, EURADOS, and IRPA, many reported unmet expectations, particularly in mentorship, sustained peer interaction, and accessible professional development. The formation of the RadoNorm Early Career Researcher Council (ECRC) responded directly to these gaps, demonstrating that self-organized, ECR-led initiatives can significantly enhance a sense of belonging and interdisciplinary engagement. However, structural barriers - such as time, funding, and short-term project support - persist, echoing the Vancouver Call for Action's call for improved education, training, and retention. In conclusion, while considerable progress has been made in addressing the needs of ECRs in radiation protection, gaps that threaten the long-term vitality of the field remain. The findings affirm the urgency of coordinated action among institutions, networks, and funding bodies to invest in and empower the next generation of radiation protection professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21002,"journal":{"name":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation and Environmental Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-025-01145-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early career researchers, professionals, and scientists (ECRs) are essential to the future of radiation protection, a field that increasingly relies on interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation. In line with the principles outlined in the Vancouver Call for Action for Radiation Protection Researchers, an ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) initiative, this article explores the current landscape for ECRs through the lens of survey data, initiative outcomes, and the establishment of the Early Career in Radiation Protection Network (ECRad). Drawing on a Europe-wide survey of 47 ECRs, the study identifies key areas of concern: while there is strong intrinsic motivation to remain in the field, perceived feasibility is often hampered by job insecurity, fragmented institutional support, and lack of structured mentorship. Although most respondents participate in existing networks such as ICRP, EURADOS, and IRPA, many reported unmet expectations, particularly in mentorship, sustained peer interaction, and accessible professional development. The formation of the RadoNorm Early Career Researcher Council (ECRC) responded directly to these gaps, demonstrating that self-organized, ECR-led initiatives can significantly enhance a sense of belonging and interdisciplinary engagement. However, structural barriers - such as time, funding, and short-term project support - persist, echoing the Vancouver Call for Action's call for improved education, training, and retention. In conclusion, while considerable progress has been made in addressing the needs of ECRs in radiation protection, gaps that threaten the long-term vitality of the field remain. The findings affirm the urgency of coordinated action among institutions, networks, and funding bodies to invest in and empower the next generation of radiation protection professionals.

对温哥华行动呼吁的回应:解决早期职业科学家在辐射防护方面的需求。
早期职业研究人员、专业人员和科学家(ecr)对辐射防护的未来至关重要,这是一个越来越依赖跨学科合作和创新的领域。根据国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)倡议“温哥华辐射防护研究人员行动呼吁”中概述的原则,本文通过调查数据、倡议结果和早期职业辐射防护网络(ECRad)的建立,探讨了辐射防护研究人员的现状。根据对欧洲范围内47个ecr的调查,该研究确定了关注的关键领域:尽管人们有强烈的内在动机留在该领域,但人们认为的可行性往往受到工作不安全感、支离破碎的机构支持和缺乏结构化指导的阻碍。尽管大多数受访者都参加了现有的网络,如ICRP、EURADOS和IRPA,但许多受访者表示,他们的期望没有得到满足,尤其是在指导、持续的同伴互动和可获得的专业发展方面。RadoNorm早期职业研究员委员会(ECRC)的成立直接回应了这些差距,表明自组织的、ECRC领导的倡议可以显著增强归属感和跨学科参与。然而,时间、资金和短期项目支持等结构性障碍依然存在,这与《温哥华行动呼吁》提出的改善教育、培训和留住人才的呼吁相呼应。总之,虽然在解决ecr在辐射防护方面的需要方面取得了相当大的进展,但威胁该领域长期活力的差距仍然存在。调查结果肯定了机构、网络和资助机构之间协调行动的紧迫性,以投资和授权下一代辐射防护专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to fundamental and applied issues in radiation research and biophysics. The topics may include: Biophysics of ionizing radiation: radiation physics and chemistry, radiation dosimetry, radiobiology, radioecology, biophysical foundations of medical applications of radiation, and radiation protection. Biological effects of radiation: experimental or theoretical work on molecular or cellular effects; relevance of biological effects for risk assessment; biological effects of medical applications of radiation; relevance of radiation for biosphere and in space; modelling of ecosystems; modelling of transport processes of substances in biotic systems. Risk assessment: epidemiological studies of cancer and non-cancer effects; quantification of risk including exposures to radiation and confounding factors Contributions to these topics may include theoretical-mathematical and experimental material, as well as description of new techniques relevant for the study of these issues. They can range from complex radiobiological phenomena to issues in health physics and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信