The empathogen 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, but not methamphetamine, increases feelings of global trust.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ramona L Martinez, Nina Radošić, Hanna Molla, Harriet de Wit, Sonja Lyubomirsky
{"title":"The empathogen 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, but not methamphetamine, increases feelings of global trust.","authors":"Ramona L Martinez, Nina Radošić, Hanna Molla, Harriet de Wit, Sonja Lyubomirsky","doi":"10.1177/02698811251370999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The empathogen and psychostimulant 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is thought to boost both subjective well-being and social connection. Although MDMA is considered to enhance social connection to a greater extent than other stimulant drugs, few studies have compared MDMA to other stimulants. In addition, previous studies have focused on social positivity effects (e.g., increased trust) for specific in-lab interaction partners without considering more generalized social positivity effects (e.g., trust in one's community).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We tested the effects of MDMA on subjective ratings of well-being and global social connection, including feelings of trust toward one's community and society. The effects of MDMA were compared to a prototypic stimulant, methamphetamine (MA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across two studies, we examined differences in subjective well-being and global social well-being 90 minutes after a conversation on MDMA (study 1; <i>N</i> = 15; 100 mg) and after a conversation on MA (study 2; <i>N</i> = 20; 20 mg) compared to a placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After MDMA, participants reported significantly higher global trust, <i>t</i>(14) = -2.583, <i>p</i> = 0.022, and marginally higher self-worth, <i>t</i>(14) = -2.000, <i>p</i> = 0.065, compared with after the placebo. Furthermore, MA did not alter scores of subjective well-being and social connection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings extend previous research by demonstrating that MDMA increases feelings of trust in the social world beyond lab-specific interaction partners. These findings are consistent with user reports of generalized social well-being effects and support the idea that MDMA may have clinical value from a social psychological perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811251370999"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251370999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The empathogen and psychostimulant 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is thought to boost both subjective well-being and social connection. Although MDMA is considered to enhance social connection to a greater extent than other stimulant drugs, few studies have compared MDMA to other stimulants. In addition, previous studies have focused on social positivity effects (e.g., increased trust) for specific in-lab interaction partners without considering more generalized social positivity effects (e.g., trust in one's community).

Aims: We tested the effects of MDMA on subjective ratings of well-being and global social connection, including feelings of trust toward one's community and society. The effects of MDMA were compared to a prototypic stimulant, methamphetamine (MA).

Methods: Across two studies, we examined differences in subjective well-being and global social well-being 90 minutes after a conversation on MDMA (study 1; N = 15; 100 mg) and after a conversation on MA (study 2; N = 20; 20 mg) compared to a placebo.

Results: After MDMA, participants reported significantly higher global trust, t(14) = -2.583, p = 0.022, and marginally higher self-worth, t(14) = -2.000, p = 0.065, compared with after the placebo. Furthermore, MA did not alter scores of subjective well-being and social connection.

Conclusions: Our findings extend previous research by demonstrating that MDMA increases feelings of trust in the social world beyond lab-specific interaction partners. These findings are consistent with user reports of generalized social well-being effects and support the idea that MDMA may have clinical value from a social psychological perspective.

移情剂3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺,而不是冰毒,增加了全球信任的感觉。
背景:ememagent和精神兴奋剂3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)被认为可以促进主观幸福感和社会联系。虽然MDMA被认为比其他兴奋剂更能增强社会联系,但很少有研究将MDMA与其他兴奋剂进行比较。此外,以往的研究主要关注特定实验室互动伙伴的社会积极效应(例如,增加信任),而没有考虑更广泛的社会积极效应(例如,对社区的信任)。目的:我们测试了MDMA对幸福感和全球社会联系的主观评分的影响,包括对社区和社会的信任感。MDMA的作用与一种原型兴奋剂甲基苯丙胺(MA)进行了比较。方法:在两项研究中,我们检查了与安慰剂相比,在MDMA交谈后90分钟(研究1;N = 15; 100毫克)和MA交谈后(研究2;N = 20; 20毫克)的主观幸福感和整体社会幸福感的差异。结果:与安慰剂相比,MDMA后,参与者报告的整体信任度显著提高,t(14) = -2.583, p = 0.022,自我价值感略有提高,t(14) = -2.000, p = 0.065。此外,MA并没有改变主观幸福感和社会联系的得分。结论:我们的研究结果扩展了先前的研究,表明MDMA增加了在实验室特定互动伙伴之外的社会世界中的信任感。这些发现与使用者报告的普遍社会福利效应一致,并从社会心理学的角度支持MDMA可能具有临床价值的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信