Comparing Online Circular Contrast Perimetry and the Esterman Visual Field Test in Glaucoma for Driving-Relevant Vision.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alexandra Klejn, Angela Gong, Simon E Skalicky
{"title":"Comparing Online Circular Contrast Perimetry and the Esterman Visual Field Test in Glaucoma for Driving-Relevant Vision.","authors":"Alexandra Klejn, Angela Gong, Simon E Skalicky","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>Online binocular perimetry showed moderate to strong agreement with Esterman visual field testing in glaucoma patients and controls, with high correlation coefficients and predictive capability. This tool may offer a viable, accessible alternative perimetry for driving licence assessment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of an online computer-based binocular driving perimetry assessment (OBDP) based on online circular contrast perimetry, and agreement with binocular static Esterman visual field testing (EVFT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective comparative cohort study was conducted on patients with or without open-angle glaucoma, recruited from a single site glaucoma subspecialty practice. Eligible subjects underwent two visual field tests using OBDP and this was compared to the results of a single EVFT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 69 years (+/- 13.4 SD). Of these, 49% were female, 18 were healthy controls, while 20, 18 and 24 had mild, moderate and severe glaucoma respectively. Pearson and intraclass correlation between the two perimetry methods for percentage of points not seen (PNS) was 0.85 and 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.9) respectively for the overall binocular visual field. When the binocular field was subdivided into 8 sectors, intra-class coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 for each sector. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a difference of 1.24% (95%CI -16.93 to 19.30%) between the two methods for the overall field, ranging from 0.04% to 4.17% for each sector. Based on the Austroads fitness to drive guidelines, OBDP demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.97% and specificity of 78.57% when compared to the EVFT. ICCs evaluating the repeatability of OBDP testing for percentage of PNS were excellent overall (0.97) and ranged from moderate to excellent for each of the 8 sectors (0.67 - 0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OBDP showed strong agreement with EVFT. As an online application that easily runs on any computer, it could expand the scope of binocular perimetry screening for licence assessment. With modifications, integration into modern clinical licencing procedures could be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precis: Online binocular perimetry showed moderate to strong agreement with Esterman visual field testing in glaucoma patients and controls, with high correlation coefficients and predictive capability. This tool may offer a viable, accessible alternative perimetry for driving licence assessment.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of an online computer-based binocular driving perimetry assessment (OBDP) based on online circular contrast perimetry, and agreement with binocular static Esterman visual field testing (EVFT).

Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study was conducted on patients with or without open-angle glaucoma, recruited from a single site glaucoma subspecialty practice. Eligible subjects underwent two visual field tests using OBDP and this was compared to the results of a single EVFT.

Results: 80 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 69 years (+/- 13.4 SD). Of these, 49% were female, 18 were healthy controls, while 20, 18 and 24 had mild, moderate and severe glaucoma respectively. Pearson and intraclass correlation between the two perimetry methods for percentage of points not seen (PNS) was 0.85 and 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.9) respectively for the overall binocular visual field. When the binocular field was subdivided into 8 sectors, intra-class coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 for each sector. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a difference of 1.24% (95%CI -16.93 to 19.30%) between the two methods for the overall field, ranging from 0.04% to 4.17% for each sector. Based on the Austroads fitness to drive guidelines, OBDP demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.97% and specificity of 78.57% when compared to the EVFT. ICCs evaluating the repeatability of OBDP testing for percentage of PNS were excellent overall (0.97) and ranged from moderate to excellent for each of the 8 sectors (0.67 - 0.98).

Conclusion: OBDP showed strong agreement with EVFT. As an online application that easily runs on any computer, it could expand the scope of binocular perimetry screening for licence assessment. With modifications, integration into modern clinical licencing procedures could be considered.

青光眼在线圆对比视野测量与Esterman视野测试对驾驶相关视力的比较。
准确性:青光眼患者和对照组的在线双眼验光结果与Esterman视野测试结果中度至高度一致,具有较高的相关系数和预测能力。这个工具可以为驾驶执照评估提供一个可行的,可访问的替代视野。目的:探讨基于在线圆形对比视野测量的在线计算机双目驱动视野评估(OBDP)的可行性,并与双目静态Esterman视野测试(EVFT)相吻合。方法:一项前瞻性比较队列研究,从单一地点青光眼亚专科诊所招募有或没有开角型青光眼的患者。符合条件的受试者使用OBDP进行两次视野测试,并将其与单次EVFT的结果进行比较。结果:80例患者入组,平均年龄69岁(+/- 13.4 SD)。其中女性49%,健康对照18例,轻度、中度和重度青光眼分别为20例、18例和24例。两种视野检查方法的未见点百分比(PNS)的Pearson和类内相关性分别为0.85和0.86(95%可信区间(CI) 0.78-0.9)。将双眼视场细分为8个扇区,每个扇区的类内系数(ICCs)在0.76 ~ 0.93之间。Bland-Altman分析显示,两种方法在整个领域的差异为1.24% (95%CI -16.93至19.30%),每个领域的差异范围为0.04%至4.17%。基于Austroads适应度驱动指南,与EVFT相比,OBDP的敏感性为96.97%,特异性为78.57%。评估OBDP测试对PNS百分比的可重复性的ICCs总体上是优秀的(0.97),8个部门中的每个部门从中等到优秀(0.67 - 0.98)。结论:OBDP与EVFT具有较强的一致性。作为一种易于在任何计算机上运行的在线应用程序,它可以扩大许可证评估的双目视距检查范围。经过修改,可以考虑将其纳入现代临床许可程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信