Qingping Deng, Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Rong, Qing Liu, Rongyuan Yang
{"title":"Association Between Gut Microbiota and Pneumonia Risk: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization.","authors":"Qingping Deng, Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Rong, Qing Liu, Rongyuan Yang","doi":"10.7150/ijms.114372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. <b>Methods:</b> Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. <b>Results:</b> Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and <i>Negativicutes</i> (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and <i>Ruminococcaceae UCG014</i> (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, <i>Negativicutes</i> conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the <i>Ruminococcus</i> torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and <i>Parasutterella</i> (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with <i>MollicutesRF9</i> (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with <i>butyrate</i> (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and <i>Ruminiclostridium</i>6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with <i>Actinobacteria</i> (1.20, 1.01-1.42), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and <i>Alloprevotella</i> (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while <i>Oxalobacter</i> (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and <i>Subdoligranulum</i> (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, <i>Actinobacteria</i>, <i>Negativicutes,</i> and <i>Alloprevotella</i> constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas <i>Oxalobacter</i> and <i>Parasutterella</i> showed trans-stage protective effects. <i>Butyrate</i> production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 14","pages":"3511-3527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.114372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The gut-lung axis represents a critical pathway potentially modulating COVID-19 pathogenesis. We employed meta-analysis to investigate the Mendelian randomization (MR) studies for the putative causal relationships between gut microbiota composition/metabolites and COVID-19 severity. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of MR studies (PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane; inception to June 2024). Data from 11 studies (aggregating 32,748,274 participants; 1,487 SNPs) underwent meta-analysis across four COVID-19 severity strata including susceptibility, infection, hospitalization, and critical disease. Study quality was evaluated using a validated MR framework assessing 32 core assumptions. Results: Elevated COVID-19 susceptibility risk was associated with Actinobacteria (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.26) and Negativicutes (1.06, 1.03-1.09), whereas protective effects emerged for Oxalobacter (0.84, 0.71-0.99) and Ruminococcaceae UCG014 (0.88, 0.78-0.99). For COVID-19 infection, Negativicutes conferred increased risk (1.13, 1.02-1.26), while the Ruminococcus torques group (0.54, 0.39-0.74) and Parasutterella (0.90, 0.83-0.97) demonstrated protection. Hospitalization risk elevated with MollicutesRF9 (1.13, 1.04-1.22) and Alloprevotella (1.25, 1.07-1.45), contrasting with butyrate (0.97, 0.94-0.99) and Ruminiclostridium6 (0.81, 0.69-0.94) showing protective associations. Severe COVID-19 risk increased with Actinobacteria (1.20, 1.01-1.42), Bifidobacterium (2.09, 1.15-3.81), and Alloprevotella (1.66, 1.36-2.01), while Oxalobacter (0.84, 0.76-0.92) and Subdoligranulum (0.82, 0.76-0.89) exhibited protection. Notably, Actinobacteria, Negativicutes, and Alloprevotella constituted consistent risk factors across severity strata, whereas Oxalobacter and Parasutterella showed trans-stage protective effects. Butyrate production specifically attenuated hospitalization risk, and Bifidobacterium demonstrated strikingly elevated critical disease risk, contrasting with typical probiotic associations. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of MR studies provides robust evidence for severity-specific causal effects of the gut microbiota on COVID-19 outcomes. The identified microbial taxa and metabolites provide potential biomarkers for clinical risk stratification and targets for novel adjuvant therapeutic strategies.
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.