Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CADOSA Registry.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clementine Labrosciano, John A Spertus, Jing Wu, Christopher J Zeitz, Rosanna Tavella, Matthew I Worthley, Margaret Arstall, Ajay Sinhal, John F Beltrame
{"title":"Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the CADOSA Registry.","authors":"Clementine Labrosciano, John A Spertus, Jing Wu, Christopher J Zeitz, Rosanna Tavella, Matthew I Worthley, Margaret Arstall, Ajay Sinhal, John F Beltrame","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of the one in five patients readmitted within 30 days of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalisation provides an opportunity for targeted proactive intervention thereby reducing the risk of readmission. To target such an intervention to those most likely to benefit, this study sought to develop and validate a model predicting 30-day, all-cause, unplanned readmission after hospitalisation for AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The index AMI encounter for patients undergoing acute coronary angiography between 2012 and 2022 enrolled into the CADOSA (Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia) Registry and discharged home across four tertiary hospitals were included. A random split sample of 70% and 30% was used for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Logistic regression with combination elimination was performed to develop the parsimonious clinical model within the derivation cohort and model discrimination was assessed in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,289 unique patients (mean age 64±13 years, 71% male, 41% ST-elevation AMIs), 14.2% were readmitted within 30 days. Readmitted patients were older (67±14 vs 63±13; p<0.001) and less likely to present with a ST-elevation AMI (38% vs 42%; p=0.003). Predictors showing a higher likelihood of readmission were patients with abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate, cardiogenic shock and increased heart rate upon arrival, new diagnosis of heart failure, being older and female, and a history of depression. The model had consistent moderate discrimination (C statistic=0.63 in the derivation and validation cohorts).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An Australian model for 30-day all-cause unplanned readmission has a similar performance to United States models. Further emphasis should be placed on providing additional support to high-risk patients upon arrival to the hospital to assist in reducing readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.06.1024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early identification of the one in five patients readmitted within 30 days of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalisation provides an opportunity for targeted proactive intervention thereby reducing the risk of readmission. To target such an intervention to those most likely to benefit, this study sought to develop and validate a model predicting 30-day, all-cause, unplanned readmission after hospitalisation for AMI.

Methods: The index AMI encounter for patients undergoing acute coronary angiography between 2012 and 2022 enrolled into the CADOSA (Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia) Registry and discharged home across four tertiary hospitals were included. A random split sample of 70% and 30% was used for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Logistic regression with combination elimination was performed to develop the parsimonious clinical model within the derivation cohort and model discrimination was assessed in the validation cohort.

Results: Among 13,289 unique patients (mean age 64±13 years, 71% male, 41% ST-elevation AMIs), 14.2% were readmitted within 30 days. Readmitted patients were older (67±14 vs 63±13; p<0.001) and less likely to present with a ST-elevation AMI (38% vs 42%; p=0.003). Predictors showing a higher likelihood of readmission were patients with abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate, cardiogenic shock and increased heart rate upon arrival, new diagnosis of heart failure, being older and female, and a history of depression. The model had consistent moderate discrimination (C statistic=0.63 in the derivation and validation cohorts).

Conclusions: An Australian model for 30-day all-cause unplanned readmission has a similar performance to United States models. Further emphasis should be placed on providing additional support to high-risk patients upon arrival to the hospital to assist in reducing readmissions.

急性心肌梗死后再入院的风险:来自CADOSA登记的见解。
背景:早期识别五分之一的急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院30天内再入院的患者为有针对性的主动干预提供了机会,从而降低了再入院的风险。为了将这种干预措施针对那些最有可能受益的人,本研究试图开发并验证一个模型,预测AMI住院后30天的全因意外再入院。方法:纳入2012年至2022年在CADOSA (South Australia冠状动脉造影数据库)登记处登记并出院的四家三级医院的急性冠状动脉造影患者的AMI指数。推导组和验证组分别采用70%和30%的随机抽样。在衍生队列中采用联合剔除的逻辑回归建立简约临床模型,并在验证队列中评估模型判别性。结果:在13289例特殊患者中(平均年龄64±13岁,71%为男性,41%为st段抬高ami), 14.2%的患者在30天内再次入院。再入院患者年龄较大(67±14 vs 63±13)。结论:澳大利亚30天全因非计划再入院模型与美国模型具有相似的表现。应进一步强调在高危患者抵达医院时提供额外支持,以协助减少再入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信