Efficacy of intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma on outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response: A systematic review.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19397
Marzieh Zamaniyan, Sepideh Peivandi, Maryam Pashazadeh, Farnaz Safarloo
{"title":"Efficacy of intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma on outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response: A systematic review.","authors":"Marzieh Zamaniyan, Sepideh Peivandi, Maryam Pashazadeh, Farnaz Safarloo","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The beneficial and long-term effects of ovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in assisted reproductive technology cycles are still debatable.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the current study is to determine the effect of ovarian PRP on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a systematic review conducted to address the research question through a structured search process. We searched databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar search engine using keywords such as \"clinical pregnancy\", \"live birth\", \"miscarriage\", \"poor ovarian response\", \"platelet-rich plasma\", and \"in vitro fertilization\". The search was conducted without a time limit until December 20, 2024. After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts of 6646 studies, 14 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 3 studies, no significant effect was observed on abortion rates, but in 1 study, no abortions were reported in the intervention group, raising concerns about the possible role of this procedure. In 5 studies, PRP significantly increased pregnancy success with in vitro fertilization. In contrast, 6 studies found this effect to be non-significant, and 2 reported inconclusive results. In terms of live birth, 5 studies showed a positive effect of PRP, but 3 studies reported non-significant results, and 2 studies reported inconclusive results. One study showed an increase in ongoing pregnancy rates in the PRP group, and 2 studies showed an increase in implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effectiveness of ovarian PRP in infertility treatment remains unclear due to conflicting results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"23 6","pages":"459-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i6.19397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The beneficial and long-term effects of ovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in assisted reproductive technology cycles are still debatable.

Objective: The aim of the current study is to determine the effect of ovarian PRP on the outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response.

Materials and methods: This is a systematic review conducted to address the research question through a structured search process. We searched databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar search engine using keywords such as "clinical pregnancy", "live birth", "miscarriage", "poor ovarian response", "platelet-rich plasma", and "in vitro fertilization". The search was conducted without a time limit until December 20, 2024. After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts of 6646 studies, 14 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion in the review.

Results: In 3 studies, no significant effect was observed on abortion rates, but in 1 study, no abortions were reported in the intervention group, raising concerns about the possible role of this procedure. In 5 studies, PRP significantly increased pregnancy success with in vitro fertilization. In contrast, 6 studies found this effect to be non-significant, and 2 reported inconclusive results. In terms of live birth, 5 studies showed a positive effect of PRP, but 3 studies reported non-significant results, and 2 studies reported inconclusive results. One study showed an increase in ongoing pregnancy rates in the PRP group, and 2 studies showed an increase in implantation.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of ovarian PRP in infertility treatment remains unclear due to conflicting results.

Abstract Image

卵巢内注射自体富血小板血浆对卵巢反应不佳妇女体外受精结局的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:卵巢富血小板血浆(PRP)在辅助生殖技术周期中的有益和长期影响仍有争议。目的:本研究的目的是确定卵巢PRP对卵巢反应差的妇女体外受精结果的影响。材料和方法:这是通过结构化的搜索过程来解决研究问题的系统综述。检索数据库包括PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar搜索引擎,检索关键词包括“临床妊娠”、“活产”、“流产”、“卵巢不良反应”、“富血小板血浆”和“体外受精”。搜寻工作一直持续到2024年12月20日,没有时间限制。在筛选了6646项研究的标题、摘要和全文后,最终选择了14项研究纳入本综述。结果:在3项研究中,未观察到对流产率的显著影响,但在1项研究中,干预组未报告流产,引起了对该手术可能作用的关注。在5项研究中,PRP显著提高了体外受精的妊娠成功率。相比之下,6项研究发现这种影响不显著,2项研究报告了不确定的结果。在活产方面,有5项研究显示PRP有积极作用,但有3项研究报告的结果不显著,2项研究报告的结果不确定。一项研究显示PRP组持续妊娠率增加,两项研究显示着床率增加。结论:卵巢PRP治疗不孕症的效果尚不清楚,结果相互矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信