Global variations in immunisation strategies against pertussis in infancy.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2025.2562197
Sarah Murphy, Anna Kelly, Dominic F Kelly
{"title":"Global variations in immunisation strategies against pertussis in infancy.","authors":"Sarah Murphy, Anna Kelly, Dominic F Kelly","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2562197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organisation (WHO) introduced the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) in 1974 to reduce morbidity and mortality from a range of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases including pertussis. However, almost 50 years later pertussis infection continues to be a public-health concern in high- and low-and-middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We review: the clinical heterogeneity of disease in an immunized population and the current estimates of global disease burden; the vaccine-types currently used to prevent pertussis infection and the evidence behind the current schedules of immunization recommended by the WHO; the current understanding of the immune responses relating to protection from disease and colonization; the regional differences in routinely used schedules of immunization.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The current heterogeneity of schedules and vaccines reflects uncertainty about the best strategies for long-term control of pertussis infection. Whole cell pertussis vaccines are associated with sustained population control of infection but are reactogenic; acellular pertussis vaccines are less reactogenic but do not appear to give sustained protection against transmission. Continuing to develop and apply emerging insights into the nature of the immune responses needed to provide robust protection against pertussis may enable the development of novel vaccines and optimal schedules of immunization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"882-903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2562197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organisation (WHO) introduced the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) in 1974 to reduce morbidity and mortality from a range of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases including pertussis. However, almost 50 years later pertussis infection continues to be a public-health concern in high- and low-and-middle-income countries.

Areas covered: We review: the clinical heterogeneity of disease in an immunized population and the current estimates of global disease burden; the vaccine-types currently used to prevent pertussis infection and the evidence behind the current schedules of immunization recommended by the WHO; the current understanding of the immune responses relating to protection from disease and colonization; the regional differences in routinely used schedules of immunization.

Expert opinion: The current heterogeneity of schedules and vaccines reflects uncertainty about the best strategies for long-term control of pertussis infection. Whole cell pertussis vaccines are associated with sustained population control of infection but are reactogenic; acellular pertussis vaccines are less reactogenic but do not appear to give sustained protection against transmission. Continuing to develop and apply emerging insights into the nature of the immune responses needed to provide robust protection against pertussis may enable the development of novel vaccines and optimal schedules of immunization.

婴儿百日咳免疫策略的全球差异。
引言:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于1974年推出了扩大免疫规划(EPI),以降低包括百日咳在内的一系列疫苗可预防传染病的发病率和死亡率。然而,近50年后,百日咳感染仍然是高收入国家和中低收入国家的一个公共卫生问题。涵盖的领域:我们审查:免疫人群中疾病的临床异质性和目前对全球疾病负担的估计;目前用于预防百日咳感染的疫苗类型以及世卫组织建议的目前免疫时间表背后的证据;目前对与疾病和定植保护有关的免疫反应的理解;常规免疫接种时间表的地区差异。专家意见:目前时间表和疫苗的异质性反映了长期控制百日咳感染的最佳策略的不确定性。全细胞百日咳疫苗与持续的人群感染控制有关,但具有反应性;无细胞百日咳疫苗的反应性较低,但似乎不能对传播提供持续的保护。继续发展和应用对提供强有力的百日咳保护所需的免疫反应性质的新见解,可能有助于开发新型疫苗和最佳免疫时间表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信