Blood flow restriction modulates common drive to motor units and force precision: implications for neuromuscular coordination.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Chia-Chan Wu, Yen-Ting Lin, Yueh Chen, Yi-Ching Chen, Ing-Shiou Hwang
{"title":"Blood flow restriction modulates common drive to motor units and force precision: implications for neuromuscular coordination.","authors":"Chia-Chan Wu, Yen-Ting Lin, Yueh Chen, Yi-Ching Chen, Ing-Shiou Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05974-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a resistance training technique that enhances muscle adaptation and strength gains under hypoxic conditions. However, its impact on motor unit (MU) coordination remains unclear. This study investigated how BFR influences intra- and inter-muscular common drives to MUs in two functional agonists during a static precision pinch task.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen adults (23.9 ± 1.3 years; nine men, nine women) performed a thumb-index finger precision pinch under BFR and non-BFR conditions, while force fluctuation dynamics and MU activities in the flexor pollicis brevis (FPB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed a significant reduction in maximal voluntary contraction following BFR application (p = 0.003). In addition, BFR significantly increased force fluctuations (p = 0.007), potentiated discharge variability (p = 0.018), and strengthened force-discharge coupling specifically in the FPB (p = 0.010). BFR increased the mean recruitment threshold of motor units in the FDI (p < 0.001), but not in the FPB (p > 0.05) during finger precision pinch. Intra-muscular common drive increased within the FDI (p < 0.001) and FPB (p < 0.001), whereas inter-muscular common drive between agonist MUs decreased (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BFR application disrupts force precision stability and neuromuscular coordination between functional agonists during precision pinch. It increases global discharge variability and intra-muscular MU synchrony. However, the resulting force fluctuations are only partially compensated by reduced inter-muscular MU synchrony, offering limited coordination flexibility among agonists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05974-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a resistance training technique that enhances muscle adaptation and strength gains under hypoxic conditions. However, its impact on motor unit (MU) coordination remains unclear. This study investigated how BFR influences intra- and inter-muscular common drives to MUs in two functional agonists during a static precision pinch task.

Methods: Eighteen adults (23.9 ± 1.3 years; nine men, nine women) performed a thumb-index finger precision pinch under BFR and non-BFR conditions, while force fluctuation dynamics and MU activities in the flexor pollicis brevis (FPB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) were analyzed.

Results: The results revealed a significant reduction in maximal voluntary contraction following BFR application (p = 0.003). In addition, BFR significantly increased force fluctuations (p = 0.007), potentiated discharge variability (p = 0.018), and strengthened force-discharge coupling specifically in the FPB (p = 0.010). BFR increased the mean recruitment threshold of motor units in the FDI (p < 0.001), but not in the FPB (p > 0.05) during finger precision pinch. Intra-muscular common drive increased within the FDI (p < 0.001) and FPB (p < 0.001), whereas inter-muscular common drive between agonist MUs decreased (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: BFR application disrupts force precision stability and neuromuscular coordination between functional agonists during precision pinch. It increases global discharge variability and intra-muscular MU synchrony. However, the resulting force fluctuations are only partially compensated by reduced inter-muscular MU synchrony, offering limited coordination flexibility among agonists.

血流限制调节运动单元和力量精度的共同驱动:对神经肌肉协调的影响。
目的:血流量限制(BFR)是一种在缺氧条件下增强肌肉适应性和力量增益的阻力训练技术。然而,其对运动单元(MU)协调的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了在静态精确捏捏任务中,BFR如何影响两种功能性激动剂的肌内和肌间共同驱动。方法:18名成人(23.9±1.3岁,男9名,女9名)在BFR和非BFR条件下进行拇指-食指精确捏指,分析拇短屈肌(FPB)和第一背骨间肌(FDI)的力波动动态和MU活动。结果:结果显示BFR应用后最大自主收缩显著减少(p = 0.003)。此外,BFR显著增加了力波动(p = 0.007),增强了放电变异性(p = 0.018),并加强了力-放电耦合,特别是在FPB中(p = 0.010)。BFR增加了手指精确捏紧时FDI运动单元的平均恢复阈值(p 0.05)。结论:应用BFR会破坏精确捏压时的力精度稳定性和功能激动剂之间的神经肌肉协调。它增加了整体放电变异性和肌内MU同步。然而,由此产生的力波动只能通过减少肌间MU同步来部分补偿,在激动剂之间提供有限的协调灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信