Monocyte maturation pattern by flow cytometry expression of CD64, CD300e, and CD14 correlates to presence of myeloid neoplasm and helps identify blast equivalents in the setting of monocytic neoplasm.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jenny Zhang, Jacob Kaplan, Elizabeth Courville
{"title":"Monocyte maturation pattern by flow cytometry expression of CD64, CD300e, and CD14 correlates to presence of myeloid neoplasm and helps identify blast equivalents in the setting of monocytic neoplasm.","authors":"Jenny Zhang, Jacob Kaplan, Elizabeth Courville","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CD300e is a marker of mature monocytes in flow cytometry; however, there is limited detailed information on staining patterns in conjunction with other monocyte markers. We evaluated the flow cytometric staining patterns of CD64, CD14, and CD300e in 12 negative and 33 positive peripheral blood specimens and 16 negative and 56 positive bone marrow specimens. The positive cases were involved by myeloid neoplasms (increased blasts and/or abnormal monocytes). Flow cytometry plots were reviewed for each case, the monocyte population was identified by bright CD64 expression, and the monocyte maturation pattern was visualized by CD14 versus CD300e plots. Peripheral blood and bone marrow differential counts were collected. A total of 39% (22/56) of the positive bone marrow cases showed a different maturation pattern from the negative bone marrow cases. Of the positive peripheral blood cases, 28/33 (85%) showed a CD14 by CD300e pattern different from that observed in the negative peripheral bloods. When the subset of bone marrow cases involved by monocytic neoplasms was evaluated, there was no significant difference between monocyte percentage by flow cytometry versus morphology and between blast plus promonocyte percentage by flow cytometry versus morphology. We conclude that isolation of monocytes by bright CD64 expression and low side-scatter and subsequent evaluation of the CD14/CD300e maturation pattern may help identify myeloid neoplasms. Quantification of CD64 + CD14- and/or CD64 + CD300e- cells by flow cytometry may aid blast/blast equivalent identification/quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.22256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CD300e is a marker of mature monocytes in flow cytometry; however, there is limited detailed information on staining patterns in conjunction with other monocyte markers. We evaluated the flow cytometric staining patterns of CD64, CD14, and CD300e in 12 negative and 33 positive peripheral blood specimens and 16 negative and 56 positive bone marrow specimens. The positive cases were involved by myeloid neoplasms (increased blasts and/or abnormal monocytes). Flow cytometry plots were reviewed for each case, the monocyte population was identified by bright CD64 expression, and the monocyte maturation pattern was visualized by CD14 versus CD300e plots. Peripheral blood and bone marrow differential counts were collected. A total of 39% (22/56) of the positive bone marrow cases showed a different maturation pattern from the negative bone marrow cases. Of the positive peripheral blood cases, 28/33 (85%) showed a CD14 by CD300e pattern different from that observed in the negative peripheral bloods. When the subset of bone marrow cases involved by monocytic neoplasms was evaluated, there was no significant difference between monocyte percentage by flow cytometry versus morphology and between blast plus promonocyte percentage by flow cytometry versus morphology. We conclude that isolation of monocytes by bright CD64 expression and low side-scatter and subsequent evaluation of the CD14/CD300e maturation pattern may help identify myeloid neoplasms. Quantification of CD64 + CD14- and/or CD64 + CD300e- cells by flow cytometry may aid blast/blast equivalent identification/quantification.

流式细胞术检测CD64、CD300e和CD14的单核细胞成熟模式与髓系肿瘤的存在相关,并有助于识别单核细胞肿瘤的母细胞等效物。
CD300e是流式细胞术中成熟单核细胞的标志物;然而,关于与其他单核细胞标志物结合的染色模式的详细信息有限。我们评估了12例阴性和33例阳性外周血标本以及16例阴性和56例阳性骨髓标本中CD64、CD14和CD300e的流式细胞术染色模式。阳性病例涉及髓系肿瘤(增加的母细胞和/或异常的单核细胞)。对每个病例的流式细胞术图进行了回顾,通过CD64的亮表达来鉴定单核细胞群体,并通过CD14和CD300e图来观察单核细胞的成熟模式。采集外周血和骨髓差异计数。共有39%(22/56)的骨髓阳性病例表现出与骨髓阴性病例不同的成熟模式。在阳性外周血病例中,28/33(85%)的CD14 - CD300e模式与阴性外周血不同。当评估单核细胞肿瘤涉及的骨髓病例亚群时,流式细胞术与形态学的单核细胞百分比之间以及流式细胞术与形态学的母细胞加原细胞百分比之间没有显著差异。我们的结论是,通过CD64亮表达和低侧散度分离单核细胞以及随后对CD14/CD300e成熟模式的评估可能有助于鉴定髓系肿瘤。流式细胞术定量CD64 + CD14-和/或CD64 + CD300e-细胞有助于母细胞/母细胞等效鉴定/定量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信