Visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy-synechiolysis with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone for chronic primary angle closure glaucoma.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ahmed S Elwehidy, Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader, Sherein M Hagras, Nada M GabAllah, Mostafa As Elwehidy, Dina Abdelfattah
{"title":"Visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy-synechiolysis with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone for chronic primary angle closure glaucoma.","authors":"Ahmed S Elwehidy, Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader, Sherein M Hagras, Nada M GabAllah, Mostafa As Elwehidy, Dina Abdelfattah","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04373-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the surgical outcomes of visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy-synechiolysis (VCSTS) with phacoemulsification compared with phacoemulsification alone for the treatment of chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Mansoura, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective double armed interventional non randomized comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 eyes (69 patients) with uncontrolled PACG between 2016 and 2022 were subjected to VCSTS with phacoemulsification (Group 1) or phacoemulsification (PE) alone (Group 2). The follow-up period was 24 months. Success was defined as an IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg, with a reduction of at least 30% from baseline with (qualified) or without (complete) antiglaucoma medications (AGMs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation ages of the study patients in groups 1 and 2 were 61.1±0.9 and 61.7±0.8 years (p=0.536), respectively. The means ± standard deviations of the preoperative and final postoperative IOP and AGM in groups 1 and 2 were 27.46±0.32 and 28.0±0.3 and 14.15±1.1 and 16.7±0.71 mmHg, respectively (p<0.001), and 3.18±0.07 and 3.2±0.9 and 0.47±1.1 and 1.1±1.5, respectively (p=0.035). The rates of complete success (Kaplan‒Meier) in groups 1 and 2 were 95.3% and 86.7%, respectively (p=0.153). Mild self-limited hyphema was the most common complication in Group 1, with no serious complications reported in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phacoemulsification results in a significant and sustained reduction in IOP and the need for AGMs for at least 2 years of follow-up. The addition of VCSTS to phacoemulsification provides a greater reduction in IOP and AGMs and improved surgical success without serious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04373-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the surgical outcomes of visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy-synechiolysis (VCSTS) with phacoemulsification compared with phacoemulsification alone for the treatment of chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).

Settings: Mansoura Ophthalmic Center, Mansoura, Egypt.

Design: Retrospective double armed interventional non randomized comparative study.

Methods: A total of 88 eyes (69 patients) with uncontrolled PACG between 2016 and 2022 were subjected to VCSTS with phacoemulsification (Group 1) or phacoemulsification (PE) alone (Group 2). The follow-up period was 24 months. Success was defined as an IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg, with a reduction of at least 30% from baseline with (qualified) or without (complete) antiglaucoma medications (AGMs).

Results: The mean ± standard deviation ages of the study patients in groups 1 and 2 were 61.1±0.9 and 61.7±0.8 years (p=0.536), respectively. The means ± standard deviations of the preoperative and final postoperative IOP and AGM in groups 1 and 2 were 27.46±0.32 and 28.0±0.3 and 14.15±1.1 and 16.7±0.71 mmHg, respectively (p<0.001), and 3.18±0.07 and 3.2±0.9 and 0.47±1.1 and 1.1±1.5, respectively (p=0.035). The rates of complete success (Kaplan‒Meier) in groups 1 and 2 were 95.3% and 86.7%, respectively (p=0.153). Mild self-limited hyphema was the most common complication in Group 1, with no serious complications reported in Group 2.

Conclusions: Phacoemulsification results in a significant and sustained reduction in IOP and the need for AGMs for at least 2 years of follow-up. The addition of VCSTS to phacoemulsification provides a greater reduction in IOP and AGMs and improved surgical success without serious complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

黏液-环周-缝合-小梁切开术联合超声乳化与单纯超声乳化治疗慢性原发性闭角型青光眼。
目的:比较超声乳化术联合粘环缝合小梁切开术治疗慢性原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)与单纯超声乳化术的疗效。地点:埃及曼苏拉曼苏拉眼科中心。设计:回顾性、双臂介入、非随机对照研究。方法:2016 - 2022年共88眼(69例)PACG未控制患者行VCSTS联合超声乳化(1组)或单独超声乳化(2组)。随访24个月。成功的定义是IOP在6 - 18mmhg之间,使用(合格的)或不使用(完全的)抗青光眼药物(AGMs)比基线降低至少30%。结果:1、2组患者的平均±标准差年龄分别为61.1±0.9岁和61.7±0.8岁(p=0.536)。1组和2组术前和术后最终IOP和AGM的平均值±标准差分别为27.46±0.32和28.0±0.3,14.15±1.1和16.7±0.71 mmHg。(结论:超声乳化术导致IOP显著和持续下降,需要至少2年的AGM随访。在超声乳化术中加入VCSTS可大大降低IOP和agm,提高手术成功率,且无严重并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信