{"title":"Optimization of First-Line Treatment Options in HER2-Altered Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Study","authors":"Xiufen Wang, Dahai Wang, Yanxin Sun, Yiling Gan, Juan Li, Xuebing Fu, Yihui Ge, Shuyun Wang, Leirong Wang, Haodong Sun, Haifeng Sun, Yuping Sun, Aiqin Gao","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>HER2 alterations are identified in 2%–4% of lung adenocarcinoma, indicating poor clinical outcomes. Chemotherapy alone (C) or in combination with bevacizumab (BC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC), or both (IBC) are standard options in the first-line setting; however, optimal therapy and beneficiary populations remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with Stage IV HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma from four cancer centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received C, BC, IC, or IBC as the first-line treatments. Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics were analyzed to explore the beneficiary populations with different treatments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>IBC treatment generated the longest mPFS and OS among four schemes. Subgroup analyses showed that IBC resulted in longer PFS in patients with brain or bone metastases compared to IC. IBC generated significant benefits in younger patients, nonsmokers, and those with oligometastases versus BC. In patients with low density of PD-1<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cells or high density of CD163<sup>+</sup> macrophages in the TIME, IBC treatment resulted in the longest PFS, followed by BC treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>IBC treatment generated optimal efficacy as first-line therapy for HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with low PD1<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell or high CD163<sup>+</sup> macrophage infiltration benefited more from IBC treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
HER2 alterations are identified in 2%–4% of lung adenocarcinoma, indicating poor clinical outcomes. Chemotherapy alone (C) or in combination with bevacizumab (BC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (IC), or both (IBC) are standard options in the first-line setting; however, optimal therapy and beneficiary populations remain unclear.
Methods
Patients with Stage IV HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma from four cancer centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received C, BC, IC, or IBC as the first-line treatments. Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics were analyzed to explore the beneficiary populations with different treatments.
Results
IBC treatment generated the longest mPFS and OS among four schemes. Subgroup analyses showed that IBC resulted in longer PFS in patients with brain or bone metastases compared to IC. IBC generated significant benefits in younger patients, nonsmokers, and those with oligometastases versus BC. In patients with low density of PD-1+CD8+ T-cells or high density of CD163+ macrophages in the TIME, IBC treatment resulted in the longest PFS, followed by BC treatment.
Conclusions
IBC treatment generated optimal efficacy as first-line therapy for HER2-altered lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with low PD1+CD8+ T-cell or high CD163+ macrophage infiltration benefited more from IBC treatment.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.