Differentiating Gastric Cancers from Acid Peptic Diseases through Integrative Targeted Proteomics and Machine Learning Approaches

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Poornima Ramesh, , , Shubham Sukerndeo Upadhyay, , , Sonet Daniel Thomas, , , Chandrashekar Jeevaraj Sorake, , , Ganesh M. K., , , Vijith Vittal Shetty, , , Prashant Kumar Modi, , , Rohan Shetty, , , Manavalan Vijayakumar, , , Jalaluddin Akbar Kandel Codi*, , and , Thottethodi Subrahmanya Keshava Prasad*, 
{"title":"Differentiating Gastric Cancers from Acid Peptic Diseases through Integrative Targeted Proteomics and Machine Learning Approaches","authors":"Poornima Ramesh,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Shubham Sukerndeo Upadhyay,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Sonet Daniel Thomas,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Chandrashekar Jeevaraj Sorake,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ganesh M. K.,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Vijith Vittal Shetty,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Prashant Kumar Modi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Rohan Shetty,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Manavalan Vijayakumar,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Jalaluddin Akbar Kandel Codi*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Thottethodi Subrahmanya Keshava Prasad*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Gastric cancers (GCs) are often diagnosed in advanced stages owing to nonspecific early symptoms resembling Acid Peptic Diseases (APDs). Despite recent efforts, a simple, liquid biopsy-based multiprotein panel prediagnostic assay capable of differentiating GCs from APDs is lacking. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based targeted proteomics methods, including Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM), are utilized as the method of choice to develop Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) that revolutionize GC early diagnosis and screening. In this study, a 22-min MS-MRM LDT was developed and tested to quantify a serum protein panel in 135 serum samples from treatment-naive cases of GCs, APDs, and healthy individuals. Notably, a novel Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based pattern recognition scoring architecture, integrated with a model explainability tool (SHAP), was developed to score and categorize GCs. The MRM-MS assay produced minimal carryover and matrix effects, with adequate limits of detection/quantification. Quantities of SAA1 and IGFBP2, as determined through ELISA, demonstrated similar sensitivity compared to the LDT. Importantly, the DNN-based scoring architecture efficiently differentiated GCs from the rest of the samples (AUROC = 0.95), with average precision marking &gt;0.90 and minimal bias in protein expression affecting model performance. This LDT can serve as a prediagnostic screening method to distinguish GCs from APDs, guiding clinicians and patients in proceeding with a confirmatory diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 10","pages":"5159–5176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancers (GCs) are often diagnosed in advanced stages owing to nonspecific early symptoms resembling Acid Peptic Diseases (APDs). Despite recent efforts, a simple, liquid biopsy-based multiprotein panel prediagnostic assay capable of differentiating GCs from APDs is lacking. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based targeted proteomics methods, including Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM), are utilized as the method of choice to develop Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) that revolutionize GC early diagnosis and screening. In this study, a 22-min MS-MRM LDT was developed and tested to quantify a serum protein panel in 135 serum samples from treatment-naive cases of GCs, APDs, and healthy individuals. Notably, a novel Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based pattern recognition scoring architecture, integrated with a model explainability tool (SHAP), was developed to score and categorize GCs. The MRM-MS assay produced minimal carryover and matrix effects, with adequate limits of detection/quantification. Quantities of SAA1 and IGFBP2, as determined through ELISA, demonstrated similar sensitivity compared to the LDT. Importantly, the DNN-based scoring architecture efficiently differentiated GCs from the rest of the samples (AUROC = 0.95), with average precision marking >0.90 and minimal bias in protein expression affecting model performance. This LDT can serve as a prediagnostic screening method to distinguish GCs from APDs, guiding clinicians and patients in proceeding with a confirmatory diagnosis.

Abstract Image

通过综合靶向蛋白质组学和机器学习方法区分胃癌和酸性消化性疾病。
胃癌(GCs)往往在晚期诊断,因为非特异性早期症状类似于酸性消化性疾病(APDs)。尽管最近做出了一些努力,但目前还缺乏一种能够区分GCs和apd的简单、基于液体活检的多蛋白面板预诊断方法。基于质谱(MS)的靶向蛋白质组学方法,包括多反应监测(MRM),被用作开发实验室开发测试(LDTs)的首选方法,彻底改变了GC的早期诊断和筛查。在这项研究中,开发了一个22分钟的MS-MRM LDT,并测试了135个血清样本中的血清蛋白,这些样本来自未接受治疗的GCs、apd和健康个体。值得注意的是,一种新的基于深度神经网络(DNN)的模式识别评分体系结构与模型可解释性工具(SHAP)相结合,被开发出来对gc进行评分和分类。MRM-MS分析产生最小的携带效应和基质效应,具有足够的检测/定量限制。通过ELISA测定的SAA1和IGFBP2的数量与LDT相比显示出相似的敏感性。重要的是,基于dnn的评分架构有效地将gc与其他样本区分开来(AUROC = 0.95),平均精度标记>0.90,蛋白质表达偏差最小,影响模型性能。这种LDT可以作为一种诊断前筛查方法来区分GCs和apd,指导临床医生和患者进行确诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信