A systems-based analysis of energy demand reduction and efficiency policies using fuzzy cognitive maps

IF 4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Guillermo Borragán, Tom Dauwe, Nele Renders
{"title":"A systems-based analysis of energy demand reduction and efficiency policies using fuzzy cognitive maps","authors":"Guillermo Borragán,&nbsp;Tom Dauwe,&nbsp;Nele Renders","doi":"10.1007/s12053-025-10362-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy Efficiency (EE) and Energy demand reduction (EDR) policies are crucial for addressing both energy security and climate change. However, despite their strategic importance, they often face significant barriers, including institutional resistance, limited funding, and short-term political priorities that tend to overlook long-term efficiency gains. This study utilizes fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) to model the factors influencing EE/EDR policy effectiveness across European countries. To capture the importance and interrelation of factors predefined from the literature, expert knowledge was leveraged through interviews with European energy agency representatives. Qualitative expert assessments were then transformed into numerical values, generating weighted causal matrices. Centrality measures subsequently identified key factors within an aggregated European model. Results revealed six pivotal factors: continuous financial support, favourable regulatory frameworks, consumer engagement, ease of implementation, long-term policy mandates, and support from industry and stakeholders. Scenario analysis explored the impact of three policy interventions: increased market actor support, weakened monitoring frameworks and increased energy literacy for end-consumers. The results of the interventions indicated that isolated interventions had limited impact on overall EE/EDR system outcomes, underscoring its complexity. However, consumer literacy initiatives mitigated negative behavioural effects, such as rebound effects and misaligned targeting, while weakened monitoring frameworks diminished policy coherence and increased redundancies. These findings reinforce the need for long-term policy stability, regulatory clarity, and robust end-user engagement. A systems-based approach, accounting for interdependencies and system dynamics, is crucial for effective EE/EDR policy design, as isolated interventions are insufficient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-025-10362-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy Efficiency (EE) and Energy demand reduction (EDR) policies are crucial for addressing both energy security and climate change. However, despite their strategic importance, they often face significant barriers, including institutional resistance, limited funding, and short-term political priorities that tend to overlook long-term efficiency gains. This study utilizes fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) to model the factors influencing EE/EDR policy effectiveness across European countries. To capture the importance and interrelation of factors predefined from the literature, expert knowledge was leveraged through interviews with European energy agency representatives. Qualitative expert assessments were then transformed into numerical values, generating weighted causal matrices. Centrality measures subsequently identified key factors within an aggregated European model. Results revealed six pivotal factors: continuous financial support, favourable regulatory frameworks, consumer engagement, ease of implementation, long-term policy mandates, and support from industry and stakeholders. Scenario analysis explored the impact of three policy interventions: increased market actor support, weakened monitoring frameworks and increased energy literacy for end-consumers. The results of the interventions indicated that isolated interventions had limited impact on overall EE/EDR system outcomes, underscoring its complexity. However, consumer literacy initiatives mitigated negative behavioural effects, such as rebound effects and misaligned targeting, while weakened monitoring frameworks diminished policy coherence and increased redundancies. These findings reinforce the need for long-term policy stability, regulatory clarity, and robust end-user engagement. A systems-based approach, accounting for interdependencies and system dynamics, is crucial for effective EE/EDR policy design, as isolated interventions are insufficient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用模糊认知地图对能源需求减少和效率政策进行系统分析
能源效率(EE)和能源需求减少(EDR)政策对于解决能源安全和气候变化问题至关重要。然而,尽管它们具有战略重要性,但它们往往面临重大障碍,包括体制阻力、资金有限以及倾向于忽视长期效率收益的短期政治优先事项。本研究利用模糊认知图(fcm)来模拟影响欧洲国家EE/EDR政策有效性的因素。为了捕捉从文献中预定义的因素的重要性和相互关系,通过与欧洲能源机构代表的访谈,利用专家知识。然后将定性专家评估转换为数值,生成加权因果矩阵。中心性测量随后确定了汇总欧洲模型中的关键因素。结果显示了六个关键因素:持续的财政支持、有利的监管框架、消费者参与、实施的便利性、长期政策要求以及行业和利益相关者的支持。情景分析探讨了三项政策干预措施的影响:增加市场行为者支持、削弱监测框架和提高终端消费者的能源知识。干预措施的结果表明,孤立的干预措施对整体EE/EDR系统结果的影响有限,强调了其复杂性。然而,消费者素养倡议减轻了负面的行为影响,如反弹效应和不一致的目标,而监测框架的削弱降低了政策一致性,增加了冗余。这些发现强化了对长期政策稳定性、监管明确性和终端用户积极参与的需求。考虑到相互依赖性和系统动态的基于系统的方法对于有效的EE/EDR政策设计至关重要,因为孤立的干预措施是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信