Comparison of Data-Driven Approach and MAT224 Material Model: A Numerical Study on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of 2024-T351 Aluminum Plates

Yejie Qiao, Xin Li, Han Zhao, Chao Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Data-Driven Approach and MAT224 Material Model: A Numerical Study on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of 2024-T351 Aluminum Plates","authors":"Yejie Qiao,&nbsp;Xin Li,&nbsp;Han Zhao,&nbsp;Chao Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s42496-024-00243-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerical simulation is a feasible and effective way to investigate the ballistic impact behavior of material. In this research, the numerical simulations of ballistic impact behavior of 2024-T351 Aluminum plates with different thicknesses struck by blunt projectiles are conducted via two numerical approaches, including a data-driven approach using the commercial software ABAQUS/Explicit and MAT224 material model using the commercial software LS-DYNA, are employed to analyze the impact response of 2024-T351 Aluminum plates, respectively. Within the data-driven approach, an enhanced rate-dependent data-driven constitutive model is utilized to describe the mechanical response, where the classical Johnson–Cook fracture criterion is employed to characterize the fracture behavior of the materials during impact simulations. Finally, the relationship between residual velocity and impact velocity, ballistic limit velocities, strain, local displacement, and penetration process are comprehensively investigated to make a detailed comparison between these two numerical approaches. It is found that the data-driven approach provides better accuracy in predicting ballistic limit velocities. Additionally, the data-driven approach differs from the MAT224 material model in the numerical simulation of target plate penetration. This research is to provide instructions for the choice of a numerical approach to the impact simulation of 2024-T351 aluminum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100054,"journal":{"name":"Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio","volume":"104 5","pages":"443 - 456"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42496-024-00243-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerical simulation is a feasible and effective way to investigate the ballistic impact behavior of material. In this research, the numerical simulations of ballistic impact behavior of 2024-T351 Aluminum plates with different thicknesses struck by blunt projectiles are conducted via two numerical approaches, including a data-driven approach using the commercial software ABAQUS/Explicit and MAT224 material model using the commercial software LS-DYNA, are employed to analyze the impact response of 2024-T351 Aluminum plates, respectively. Within the data-driven approach, an enhanced rate-dependent data-driven constitutive model is utilized to describe the mechanical response, where the classical Johnson–Cook fracture criterion is employed to characterize the fracture behavior of the materials during impact simulations. Finally, the relationship between residual velocity and impact velocity, ballistic limit velocities, strain, local displacement, and penetration process are comprehensively investigated to make a detailed comparison between these two numerical approaches. It is found that the data-driven approach provides better accuracy in predicting ballistic limit velocities. Additionally, the data-driven approach differs from the MAT224 material model in the numerical simulation of target plate penetration. This research is to provide instructions for the choice of a numerical approach to the impact simulation of 2024-T351 aluminum.

数据驱动方法与MAT224材料模型的比较——2024-T351铝板弹道冲击性能的数值研究
数值模拟是研究材料弹道冲击行为的一种可行而有效的方法。本文采用商业软件ABAQUS/Explicit和商业软件LS-DYNA分别采用数据驱动法和MAT224材料模型两种数值方法,对2024-T351铝板在钝器弹丸冲击下的弹道冲击行为进行了数值模拟,分析了2024-T351铝板的冲击响应。在数据驱动方法中,利用增强的速率相关数据驱动本构模型来描述力学响应,其中采用经典的Johnson-Cook断裂准则来表征材料在冲击模拟过程中的断裂行为。最后,全面研究了残余速度与冲击速度、弹道极限速度、应变、局部位移和侵彻过程的关系,并对两种数值方法进行了详细比较。结果表明,数据驱动方法对弹道极限速度的预测精度较高。此外,数据驱动方法在靶板侵彻数值模拟中与MAT224材料模型有所不同。本研究旨在为2024-T351铝合金冲击模拟数值方法的选择提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信