John Holoubek, Pu Zhang, Chad Serrao, Huayue Ai, Il Rok Choi, Louisa C. Greenburg, Xun Guan, Angela Cai, Wenbo Zhang and Yi Cui
{"title":"A solvation-driven reevaluation of organic electrolytes for zinc batteries†","authors":"John Holoubek, Pu Zhang, Chad Serrao, Huayue Ai, Il Rok Choi, Louisa C. Greenburg, Xun Guan, Angela Cai, Wenbo Zhang and Yi Cui","doi":"10.1039/D5EE02978C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Zinc batteries promise low-cost energy storage for grids but are limited by poor negative electrode reversibility. Thermodynamically stable organic electrolytes can theoretically enhance said reversibility but present high raw material costs and sluggish electrochemical kinetics. Herein, we demonstrate that abandoning the state-of-the-art chemistries based on fluorinated zinc salts and specialty solvents for those based on ZnCl<small><sub>2</sub></small> and mass-produced organic solvents can simultaneously remedy both issues. The Zn<small><sup>2+</sup></small> solvation structure of these electrolytes substantially reduces the Zn deposition overpotential relative to conventional organic systems and generates polyhedral Zn with preferential Zn(002) texturing. Optimized electrolytes based on ZnCl<small><sub>2</sub></small> and ethyl acetate (EA) demonstrate Coulombic efficiencies (CE) of >99.9% without any discernible losses during 24 hour calendar aging. Economic projections indicate that these systems present a more than 80% reduction in the levelized electrolyte cost relative to aqueous systems when 24 hours of corrosion losses are considered. Lastly, we demonstrate a hybrid Zn/Na full cell, in which the designed electrolyte is projected to contribute only 5.0% of the material cost. This work offers a route to scalable, low-cost organic electrolytes for Zn batteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":" 18","pages":" 8608-8617"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d5ee02978c","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Zinc batteries promise low-cost energy storage for grids but are limited by poor negative electrode reversibility. Thermodynamically stable organic electrolytes can theoretically enhance said reversibility but present high raw material costs and sluggish electrochemical kinetics. Herein, we demonstrate that abandoning the state-of-the-art chemistries based on fluorinated zinc salts and specialty solvents for those based on ZnCl2 and mass-produced organic solvents can simultaneously remedy both issues. The Zn2+ solvation structure of these electrolytes substantially reduces the Zn deposition overpotential relative to conventional organic systems and generates polyhedral Zn with preferential Zn(002) texturing. Optimized electrolytes based on ZnCl2 and ethyl acetate (EA) demonstrate Coulombic efficiencies (CE) of >99.9% without any discernible losses during 24 hour calendar aging. Economic projections indicate that these systems present a more than 80% reduction in the levelized electrolyte cost relative to aqueous systems when 24 hours of corrosion losses are considered. Lastly, we demonstrate a hybrid Zn/Na full cell, in which the designed electrolyte is projected to contribute only 5.0% of the material cost. This work offers a route to scalable, low-cost organic electrolytes for Zn batteries.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).