{"title":"Techno-Economic Assessment of Renewably Powered Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction for a Sustainable Nitrogen Cycle","authors":"Biyu Kang, , , Mingshuo Jiao, , , Fengting Li, , , Zhenhai Wen, , , Chao Zhang, , and , Ying Wang*, ","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO<sub>3</sub>RR) exhibits substantial potential in eliminating waste NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> by selectively converting it into N<sub>2</sub> or valuable resources NH<sub>3</sub>. Since eNO<sub>3</sub>RR has made rapid progress recently, it is vital to conduct a systematic evaluation of its feasibility. Herein, we provide a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR and propose economically and environmentally favorable thresholds to systematically guide its industrial-scale implementation. Sensitivity analysis suggests that current density is the most crucial factor for N<sub>2</sub>, showing an even greater impact than electricity price, while voltage ranks second only to electricity price for NH<sub>3</sub>, highlighting optimization priorities. The profitability of eNO<sub>3</sub>RR-to-NH<sub>3</sub> at $0.03/kWh depends on the progression of performance: the full-cell energy efficiency exceeds 50% at a current density >500 mA/cm². Through continuous technological optimization, the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) is projected to decrease from $0.92/kg to $0.14/kg, substantially below current NH<sub>3</sub> market prices. LCA reveals that renewable-electricity-powered eNO<sub>3</sub>RR achieves near-zero global warming potential (GWP, <0.4 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/kg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>-N), offering superior decarbonization compared to conventional wastewater treatment (WWTP) and Haber-Bosch (H–B) processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 38","pages":"16046–16057"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction (eNO3RR) exhibits substantial potential in eliminating waste NO3– by selectively converting it into N2 or valuable resources NH3. Since eNO3RR has made rapid progress recently, it is vital to conduct a systematic evaluation of its feasibility. Herein, we provide a comprehensive techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of eNO3RR and propose economically and environmentally favorable thresholds to systematically guide its industrial-scale implementation. Sensitivity analysis suggests that current density is the most crucial factor for N2, showing an even greater impact than electricity price, while voltage ranks second only to electricity price for NH3, highlighting optimization priorities. The profitability of eNO3RR-to-NH3 at $0.03/kWh depends on the progression of performance: the full-cell energy efficiency exceeds 50% at a current density >500 mA/cm². Through continuous technological optimization, the levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) is projected to decrease from $0.92/kg to $0.14/kg, substantially below current NH3 market prices. LCA reveals that renewable-electricity-powered eNO3RR achieves near-zero global warming potential (GWP, <0.4 kg CO2e/kg NO3–-N), offering superior decarbonization compared to conventional wastewater treatment (WWTP) and Haber-Bosch (H–B) processes.
期刊介绍:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment.
The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.