Short‐Term Sustainability: Neoliberal Philanthropy, Dependency, and Divine Economics in Islamic Zanzibar

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Caitlyn Bolton
{"title":"Short‐Term Sustainability: Neoliberal Philanthropy, Dependency, and Divine Economics in Islamic Zanzibar","authors":"Caitlyn Bolton","doi":"10.1002/sea2.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the concept of sustainability became mainstream in development discourses from its environmentalist origins, it increasingly came to resemble the unchecked capitalist logics that it was originally meant to critique: Rather than reorganizing the economy, sustainability could be achieved <jats:italic>through</jats:italic> the economy as philanthropy became modeled on venture capitalism. This article traces this neoliberal refashioning of sustainability by charting how one Islamic development organization's funding was cut when its project to develop a preprimary sector in Zanzibar's schools was deemed unsustainable. I term this now‐dominant model of funding <jats:italic>short‐term sustainability</jats:italic> for the way that it narrowly focuses on a temporal frame of only a few years, demanding that projects “sustain” themselves after initial investment through either profit generation or embeddedness in the neoliberal state. In contrast, I chart how another organization redefines sustainability as long‐term relationships of wealth redistribution and care. By modeling funding on the Islamic <jats:italic>waqf</jats:italic> (pious charitable endowment), they center the spiritual and material interdependence of donors and recipients, in contrast to the Euro‐American liberal valuation of independence that undergirds much contemporary sustainability discourse. Closer to its environmentalist origins, sustainability here is premised on humanity's fundamental dependency, thick webs of relationality, and a commitment to mutual flourishing.","PeriodicalId":45372,"journal":{"name":"Economic Anthropology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the concept of sustainability became mainstream in development discourses from its environmentalist origins, it increasingly came to resemble the unchecked capitalist logics that it was originally meant to critique: Rather than reorganizing the economy, sustainability could be achieved through the economy as philanthropy became modeled on venture capitalism. This article traces this neoliberal refashioning of sustainability by charting how one Islamic development organization's funding was cut when its project to develop a preprimary sector in Zanzibar's schools was deemed unsustainable. I term this now‐dominant model of funding short‐term sustainability for the way that it narrowly focuses on a temporal frame of only a few years, demanding that projects “sustain” themselves after initial investment through either profit generation or embeddedness in the neoliberal state. In contrast, I chart how another organization redefines sustainability as long‐term relationships of wealth redistribution and care. By modeling funding on the Islamic waqf (pious charitable endowment), they center the spiritual and material interdependence of donors and recipients, in contrast to the Euro‐American liberal valuation of independence that undergirds much contemporary sustainability discourse. Closer to its environmentalist origins, sustainability here is premised on humanity's fundamental dependency, thick webs of relationality, and a commitment to mutual flourishing.
短期可持续性:伊斯兰桑给巴尔的新自由主义慈善、依赖和神圣经济学
随着可持续性概念从其环保主义起源成为发展话语的主流,它越来越像不受约束的资本主义逻辑,而这正是它最初想要批评的:与其重组经济,不如通过经济实现可持续性,因为慈善事业以风险资本主义为模型。这篇文章追溯了新自由主义对可持续性的重塑,通过图表显示了一个伊斯兰发展组织在桑给巴尔的学校发展学前教育的项目被认为是不可持续的,它的资金是如何被削减的。我将这种目前占主导地位的资助模式称为短期可持续性,因为它狭隘地关注仅几年的时间框架,要求项目在初始投资后通过产生利润或嵌入新自由主义国家来“维持”自己。相比之下,我绘制了另一个组织如何将可持续性重新定义为财富再分配和关怀的长期关系。通过模仿伊斯兰教的waqf(虔诚的慈善捐赠),他们将捐赠者和接受者在精神和物质上的相互依赖作为中心,这与欧美自由主义对独立性的评价形成鲜明对比,后者是当代可持续发展话语的基础。更接近其环保主义的起源,这里的可持续发展是基于人类的基本依赖,紧密的关系网络,以及对共同繁荣的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Anthropology
Economic Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信