Balancing Efficiency and Culture: How Individualism Shapes the Environmental, Social, and Governance–Performance Nexus in Industrial Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises
{"title":"Balancing Efficiency and Culture: How Individualism Shapes the Environmental, Social, and Governance–Performance Nexus in Industrial Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises","authors":"Wen‐Min Lu, Jui‐Cheng Chen, Hsiu‐Fei Wang, Irene Wei Kiong Ting","doi":"10.1002/bse.70209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars on sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency in multinational enterprises within the industrial manufacturing sector, while incorporating the moderating role of individualism. Our hierarchical regression findings from 46 MNEs as samples from 2017 to 2023 reveal that the environmental pillar negatively impacts sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency, suggesting that environmental initiatives reduce operational and financial efficiency, especially when not well integrated with core business strategies. In contrast, the social and governance pillars (GPs) demonstrate positive effects, highlighting the role of socially responsible practices and sound governance in enhancing stakeholder trust, employee productivity, and managerial effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that individualism significantly moderates the relationship between ESG pillars and efficiency outcomes. Specifically, higher levels of individualism intensify the negative effects of environmental and social initiatives on profitability, indicating that cultural context can hinder the translation of ESG investments into profitable efficiency. These findings offer important implications for policymakers, managers, and investors by emphasizing the need to align ESG strategies with local cultural norms. This study contributes to the literature by offering a complex, context‐aware understanding of ESG and efficiency linkages and by integrating cultural dimensions into ESG‐performance models, an area previously underexplored in cross‐border efficiency studies.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars on sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency in multinational enterprises within the industrial manufacturing sector, while incorporating the moderating role of individualism. Our hierarchical regression findings from 46 MNEs as samples from 2017 to 2023 reveal that the environmental pillar negatively impacts sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency, suggesting that environmental initiatives reduce operational and financial efficiency, especially when not well integrated with core business strategies. In contrast, the social and governance pillars (GPs) demonstrate positive effects, highlighting the role of socially responsible practices and sound governance in enhancing stakeholder trust, employee productivity, and managerial effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that individualism significantly moderates the relationship between ESG pillars and efficiency outcomes. Specifically, higher levels of individualism intensify the negative effects of environmental and social initiatives on profitability, indicating that cultural context can hinder the translation of ESG investments into profitable efficiency. These findings offer important implications for policymakers, managers, and investors by emphasizing the need to align ESG strategies with local cultural norms. This study contributes to the literature by offering a complex, context‐aware understanding of ESG and efficiency linkages and by integrating cultural dimensions into ESG‐performance models, an area previously underexplored in cross‐border efficiency studies.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.