Balancing Efficiency and Culture: How Individualism Shapes the Environmental, Social, and Governance–Performance Nexus in Industrial Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Wen‐Min Lu, Jui‐Cheng Chen, Hsiu‐Fei Wang, Irene Wei Kiong Ting
{"title":"Balancing Efficiency and Culture: How Individualism Shapes the Environmental, Social, and Governance–Performance Nexus in Industrial Manufacturing Multinational Enterprises","authors":"Wen‐Min Lu, Jui‐Cheng Chen, Hsiu‐Fei Wang, Irene Wei Kiong Ting","doi":"10.1002/bse.70209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars on sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency in multinational enterprises within the industrial manufacturing sector, while incorporating the moderating role of individualism. Our hierarchical regression findings from 46 MNEs as samples from 2017 to 2023 reveal that the environmental pillar negatively impacts sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency, suggesting that environmental initiatives reduce operational and financial efficiency, especially when not well integrated with core business strategies. In contrast, the social and governance pillars (GPs) demonstrate positive effects, highlighting the role of socially responsible practices and sound governance in enhancing stakeholder trust, employee productivity, and managerial effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that individualism significantly moderates the relationship between ESG pillars and efficiency outcomes. Specifically, higher levels of individualism intensify the negative effects of environmental and social initiatives on profitability, indicating that cultural context can hinder the translation of ESG investments into profitable efficiency. These findings offer important implications for policymakers, managers, and investors by emphasizing the need to align ESG strategies with local cultural norms. This study contributes to the literature by offering a complex, context‐aware understanding of ESG and efficiency linkages and by integrating cultural dimensions into ESG‐performance models, an area previously underexplored in cross‐border efficiency studies.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars on sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency in multinational enterprises within the industrial manufacturing sector, while incorporating the moderating role of individualism. Our hierarchical regression findings from 46 MNEs as samples from 2017 to 2023 reveal that the environmental pillar negatively impacts sustainable efficiency and profitability efficiency, suggesting that environmental initiatives reduce operational and financial efficiency, especially when not well integrated with core business strategies. In contrast, the social and governance pillars (GPs) demonstrate positive effects, highlighting the role of socially responsible practices and sound governance in enhancing stakeholder trust, employee productivity, and managerial effectiveness. Further analysis reveals that individualism significantly moderates the relationship between ESG pillars and efficiency outcomes. Specifically, higher levels of individualism intensify the negative effects of environmental and social initiatives on profitability, indicating that cultural context can hinder the translation of ESG investments into profitable efficiency. These findings offer important implications for policymakers, managers, and investors by emphasizing the need to align ESG strategies with local cultural norms. This study contributes to the literature by offering a complex, context‐aware understanding of ESG and efficiency linkages and by integrating cultural dimensions into ESG‐performance models, an area previously underexplored in cross‐border efficiency studies.
平衡效率和文化:个人主义如何塑造工业制造跨国企业的环境、社会和治理绩效关系
本研究考察了环境、社会和治理(ESG)支柱对工业制造业跨国企业可持续效率和盈利效率的影响,同时纳入了个人主义的调节作用。从2017年到2023年,我们对46家跨国公司的样本进行了层次回归分析,结果显示,环境支柱对可持续效率和盈利效率产生了负面影响,这表明环境举措会降低运营和财务效率,尤其是在与核心业务战略没有很好整合的情况下。相比之下,社会和治理支柱(gp)表现出积极的影响,突出了社会责任实践和良好治理在提高利益相关者信任、员工生产力和管理效率方面的作用。进一步分析表明,个人主义显著调节了ESG支柱与效率结果之间的关系。具体而言,较高的个人主义水平会加剧环境和社会举措对盈利能力的负面影响,这表明文化背景会阻碍ESG投资转化为盈利效率。这些发现强调了将ESG战略与当地文化规范相结合的必要性,为政策制定者、管理者和投资者提供了重要启示。本研究对ESG和效率之间的联系提供了复杂的、情境感知的理解,并将文化维度整合到ESG绩效模型中,这是以前跨境效率研究中未充分探索的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信