Density Constrains Environmental Impacts of Fluid Abstraction in Closed‐Basin Lithium Brines

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Daniel B. Corkran, David F. Boutt, Lee Ann Munk, Brendan J. Moran, Sarah V. McKnight, Jordan Jenckes, Alexander Kirshen
{"title":"Density Constrains Environmental Impacts of Fluid Abstraction in Closed‐Basin Lithium Brines","authors":"Daniel B. Corkran, David F. Boutt, Lee Ann Munk, Brendan J. Moran, Sarah V. McKnight, Jordan Jenckes, Alexander Kirshen","doi":"10.1029/2024wr039511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unprecedented expansion of lithium mining in closed‐basin brines is sparking concerns that mine‐related brine abstraction will stress freshwater resources and harm sensitive wetland ecosystems. These fears stoke preexisting conflicts between indigenous communities, governments, and mining interests. However, until now there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of how groundwater flux to wetlands in these systems responds to brine and freshwater abstraction to support these concerns. This study characterizes the hydrogeologic relationship between both brine and freshwater abstraction and groundwater discharge to wetlands in closed‐basin brine systems utilizing groundwater‐flow models representing three closed‐basin brine system endmembers. The models show that regardless of hydrogeologic conditions, fresh groundwater abstraction has a 200%–2,300% larger impact than halite brine abstraction on groundwater‐dependent wetlands over a 200‐year period. The primary control mechanisms for groundwater discharge response to abstraction are proximity to the abstraction point and density‐driven storage flux, which magnifies the impacts of freshwater abstraction and buffers the impacts of brine abstraction. Observations of changes in wetland vegetation near existing lithium brine mines show a 90% reduction in vegetated wetland area in response to freshwater abstraction but no observable change in response to brine abstraction, in agreement with the results of the modeling study. These findings demonstrate that minimizing freshwater use is more effective at protecting groundwater‐dependent wetlands than limiting brine drawdowns in closed‐basin brine systems.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unprecedented expansion of lithium mining in closed‐basin brines is sparking concerns that mine‐related brine abstraction will stress freshwater resources and harm sensitive wetland ecosystems. These fears stoke preexisting conflicts between indigenous communities, governments, and mining interests. However, until now there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of how groundwater flux to wetlands in these systems responds to brine and freshwater abstraction to support these concerns. This study characterizes the hydrogeologic relationship between both brine and freshwater abstraction and groundwater discharge to wetlands in closed‐basin brine systems utilizing groundwater‐flow models representing three closed‐basin brine system endmembers. The models show that regardless of hydrogeologic conditions, fresh groundwater abstraction has a 200%–2,300% larger impact than halite brine abstraction on groundwater‐dependent wetlands over a 200‐year period. The primary control mechanisms for groundwater discharge response to abstraction are proximity to the abstraction point and density‐driven storage flux, which magnifies the impacts of freshwater abstraction and buffers the impacts of brine abstraction. Observations of changes in wetland vegetation near existing lithium brine mines show a 90% reduction in vegetated wetland area in response to freshwater abstraction but no observable change in response to brine abstraction, in agreement with the results of the modeling study. These findings demonstrate that minimizing freshwater use is more effective at protecting groundwater‐dependent wetlands than limiting brine drawdowns in closed‐basin brine systems.
封闭盆地锂盐流体提取对环境影响的密度限制
封闭盆地卤水中锂矿开采的空前扩张引发了人们的担忧,即与矿山相关的卤水开采将对淡水资源造成压力,并损害敏感的湿地生态系统。这些担忧加剧了土著社区、政府和矿业利益之间本来就存在的冲突。然而,到目前为止,还没有对这些系统中流入湿地的地下水如何响应盐水和淡水提取的全面评估来支持这些担忧。本研究利用地下水流动模型表征了封闭盆地盐水系统中盐水和淡水抽取以及地下水向湿地排放之间的水文地质关系,该模型代表了三个封闭盆地盐水系统末端。模型显示,无论水文地质条件如何,在200年的时间里,淡水抽取对依赖地下水的湿地的影响比盐卤抽取大200% - 2300%。地下水流量对抽采响应的主要控制机制是靠近抽采点和密度驱动的蓄水通量,它们放大了淡水抽采的影响,缓冲了盐水抽采的影响。对现有锂盐矿附近湿地植被变化的观测显示,淡水抽采后湿地植被面积减少了90%,但抽采盐水后湿地植被面积没有明显变化,这与模型研究的结果一致。这些发现表明,在保护依赖地下水的湿地方面,尽量减少淡水的使用比限制封闭盆地盐水系统中的盐水减少更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信