Density‐dependent growth and dispersal can accurately forecast near‐term range shifts in a dominant dryland tree species

IF 5.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Elise Pletcher, Robert K. Shriver
{"title":"Density‐dependent growth and dispersal can accurately forecast near‐term range shifts in a dominant dryland tree species","authors":"Elise Pletcher, Robert K. Shriver","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Forecasting how species will shift their distribution and abundance in response to global change is a pressing challenge facing ecologists. Over broad scales, extrinsic environmental factors (e.g. climate) are often recognized as the primary driver of species range limits. Yet, range limits are the culmination of a complex set of scale‐dependent mechanisms that ultimately drive a population to shift in space, and the degree to which each of these factors must be captured to accurately forecast near‐term species range shifts is unclear.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Using a hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling approach, we tested the extent to which external drivers (climate and topography) and intrinsic population dynamics (density‐dependent growth and dispersal) could predict observed species range expansions in one of the most widespread vegetation types in the western US, Pinyon‐Juniper woodlands.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We built and trained a hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal model using 31 years of remotely sensed tree cover data along a historically expanding range margin. We tested a suite of models with varying environmental covariates and evaluated forecast performance on a 5‐year holdout period. We also evaluated model transferability and forecast performance in new locations.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We found that the addition of climatic and topographic covariates to our base population model did not result in higher forecast accuracy. In sample, all models resulted in normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.1, for a 5‐year holdout period. Additionally, the base model emerged with the highest forecast accuracy in new locations, and performance was markedly similar to the original, in sample location, by the last 5 years of a 35‐year holdout period (NRMSE 0.17–0.19).</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis.</jats:italic> We found that the inclusion of external drivers such as climate conditions or topography generally did not improve forecast accuracy and that at multidecadal time scales, intrinsic population processes (density‐dependent growth and dispersal dynamics) can accurately predict shifting abundances along a historical range margin. Our results suggest that accurate near‐term forecasts of changing plant distributions and abundances may be possible using comparatively simple ecological models.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forecasting how species will shift their distribution and abundance in response to global change is a pressing challenge facing ecologists. Over broad scales, extrinsic environmental factors (e.g. climate) are often recognized as the primary driver of species range limits. Yet, range limits are the culmination of a complex set of scale‐dependent mechanisms that ultimately drive a population to shift in space, and the degree to which each of these factors must be captured to accurately forecast near‐term species range shifts is unclear. Using a hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling approach, we tested the extent to which external drivers (climate and topography) and intrinsic population dynamics (density‐dependent growth and dispersal) could predict observed species range expansions in one of the most widespread vegetation types in the western US, Pinyon‐Juniper woodlands. We built and trained a hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal model using 31 years of remotely sensed tree cover data along a historically expanding range margin. We tested a suite of models with varying environmental covariates and evaluated forecast performance on a 5‐year holdout period. We also evaluated model transferability and forecast performance in new locations. We found that the addition of climatic and topographic covariates to our base population model did not result in higher forecast accuracy. In sample, all models resulted in normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 0.1, for a 5‐year holdout period. Additionally, the base model emerged with the highest forecast accuracy in new locations, and performance was markedly similar to the original, in sample location, by the last 5 years of a 35‐year holdout period (NRMSE 0.17–0.19). Synthesis. We found that the inclusion of external drivers such as climate conditions or topography generally did not improve forecast accuracy and that at multidecadal time scales, intrinsic population processes (density‐dependent growth and dispersal dynamics) can accurately predict shifting abundances along a historical range margin. Our results suggest that accurate near‐term forecasts of changing plant distributions and abundances may be possible using comparatively simple ecological models.
密度依赖性生长和扩散可以准确预测旱地优势树种的近期范围变化
预测物种将如何改变其分布和丰度以应对全球变化是生态学家面临的一个紧迫挑战。在大尺度上,外部环境因素(如气候)通常被认为是物种范围限制的主要驱动因素。然而,范围限制是一套复杂的规模依赖机制的顶点,这些机制最终驱动种群在空间上的转移,而为了准确预测近期物种范围转移,必须捕捉到这些因素中的每一个,目前尚不清楚。使用分层贝叶斯时空建模方法,我们测试了外部驱动因素(气候和地形)和内在种群动态(密度依赖的生长和扩散)在多大程度上可以预测美国西部最广泛的植被类型之一——松-桧林地中观察到的物种范围扩张。我们利用31年的遥感树木覆盖数据建立并训练了一个分层贝叶斯时空模型。我们测试了一套具有不同环境协变量的模型,并评估了5年抵制期的预测性能。我们还评估了模型在新地点的可转移性和预测性能。我们发现,在我们的基本人口模型中加入气候和地形协变量并没有导致更高的预测精度。在样本中,所有模型在5年的保留期内的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)为0.1。此外,在35年的停滞期的最后5年,基本模型在新地点的预测精度最高,表现与样本地点的原始模型明显相似(NRMSE 0.17-0.19)。合成。我们发现,包括气候条件或地形等外部驱动因素通常不会提高预测的准确性,并且在多年代际时间尺度上,内在的种群过程(密度依赖的生长和扩散动力学)可以准确地预测沿历史范围边缘移动的丰度。我们的研究结果表明,使用相对简单的生态模型可以准确地预测植物分布和丰度的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信