Subdural and epi-arachnoid hemorrhage following spinal epidural block requiring hematoma removal: illustrative case.

Sang Youp Han, So Un Se, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Choon-Keun Park
{"title":"Subdural and epi-arachnoid hemorrhage following spinal epidural block requiring hematoma removal: illustrative case.","authors":"Sang Youp Han, So Un Se, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Choon-Keun Park","doi":"10.3171/CASE25448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal epidural block is widely used for pain control. While complications such as CSF leakage or epidural hematoma are occasionally reported, subdural hematoma (SDH) following an epidural block is rare. To the authors' knowledge, a hematoma involving both the subdural and epi-arachnoid spaces has not been previously reported.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A 49-year-old man with a history of chronic back pain developed severe bilateral leg paresthesia 8 days after a routine lumbar epidural block. MRI revealed an SDH extending from T8 to S3, compressing the dorsal spinal canal. Surgical decompression was performed via hemilaminectomy at L2-3 and L5-S1, followed by durotomy and irrigation with a Nelaton catheter. The patient had full symptomatic relief postoperatively and showed complete hematoma resolution within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>Although spinal epidural block is generally considered a safe procedure, rare complications such as SDH can occur. Physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for such complications in patients presenting without new neurological symptoms after epidural block. When diagnosed with SDH, surgical treatment including laminectomy and irrigation via Nelaton catheter may be necessary to optimize patient outcomes. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25448.</p>","PeriodicalId":94098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","volume":"10 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE25448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal epidural block is widely used for pain control. While complications such as CSF leakage or epidural hematoma are occasionally reported, subdural hematoma (SDH) following an epidural block is rare. To the authors' knowledge, a hematoma involving both the subdural and epi-arachnoid spaces has not been previously reported.

Observations: A 49-year-old man with a history of chronic back pain developed severe bilateral leg paresthesia 8 days after a routine lumbar epidural block. MRI revealed an SDH extending from T8 to S3, compressing the dorsal spinal canal. Surgical decompression was performed via hemilaminectomy at L2-3 and L5-S1, followed by durotomy and irrigation with a Nelaton catheter. The patient had full symptomatic relief postoperatively and showed complete hematoma resolution within 3 months.

Lessons: Although spinal epidural block is generally considered a safe procedure, rare complications such as SDH can occur. Physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for such complications in patients presenting without new neurological symptoms after epidural block. When diagnosed with SDH, surgical treatment including laminectomy and irrigation via Nelaton catheter may be necessary to optimize patient outcomes. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25448.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脊髓硬膜外阻滞后硬膜下和蛛网膜外出血,需要血肿清除:说明性病例。
背景:脊髓硬膜外阻滞广泛应用于疼痛控制。虽然脑脊液渗漏或硬膜外血肿等并发症偶有报道,但硬膜外阻滞后的硬膜下血肿(SDH)是罕见的。据作者所知,涉及硬膜下和蛛网膜外腔的血肿以前没有报道过。观察:一名49岁男性,有慢性背痛病史,在常规腰硬膜外阻滞8天后出现严重的双侧腿感觉异常。MRI显示SDH从T8延伸至S3,压迫椎管背侧。通过L2-3和L5-S1半椎板切除术进行手术减压,随后行硬膜切开和Nelaton导管冲洗。患者术后症状完全缓解,3个月内血肿完全消退。经验教训:尽管脊髓硬膜外阻滞通常被认为是一种安全的手术,但罕见的并发症如SDH也会发生。对于硬膜外阻滞后未出现新的神经系统症状的患者,医生应高度警惕此类并发症。当诊断为SDH时,手术治疗包括椎板切除术和Nelaton导管冲洗可能是必要的,以优化患者的预后。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25448。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信