Raphaële Quatre, Åsa Bonnard, Martin Eklöf, Fatima M Denanto, Torkel B Brismar, Jeremy Wales
{"title":"Comparison of photon-counting CT and conventional CT for cochlear implant preoperative planning.","authors":"Raphaële Quatre, Åsa Bonnard, Martin Eklöf, Fatima M Denanto, Torkel B Brismar, Jeremy Wales","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2555115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate cochlear measurements are crucial for personalized cochlear implantation, requiring high-quality imaging for precise cochlear duct length (CDL) assessment. Photon-counting computed tomography (PC-CT) is an advanced imaging technique that enhances image quality while reducing radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare PC-CT and conventional CT in cochlear measurements using cochlear implant planning software in patients with a unilateral cochlear implant.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. All patients had a previous conventional temporal bone CT before cochlear implantation and a PC-CT of the temporal bone for the post implant evaluation. Image analysis for both PC-CT and CT was performed with the OTOPLAN version 3.0 software manually and independently by three different otologist experts in the field.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten cochleae were evaluated. The mean full CDL was 35.81 ± 1.22 mm in CT and 35.99 ± 1.94 mm in PC-CT (P = 0.77) Inter-observer reliability was poor for CT with an intra-correlation coefficient of 0.16 and moderate for PC-CT with an intra-correlation coefficient of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the advantages of PC-CT over conventional CT by improving the reliability and reproducibility of CDL measurements in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2555115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate cochlear measurements are crucial for personalized cochlear implantation, requiring high-quality imaging for precise cochlear duct length (CDL) assessment. Photon-counting computed tomography (PC-CT) is an advanced imaging technique that enhances image quality while reducing radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare PC-CT and conventional CT in cochlear measurements using cochlear implant planning software in patients with a unilateral cochlear implant.
Method: This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. All patients had a previous conventional temporal bone CT before cochlear implantation and a PC-CT of the temporal bone for the post implant evaluation. Image analysis for both PC-CT and CT was performed with the OTOPLAN version 3.0 software manually and independently by three different otologist experts in the field.
Results: Ten cochleae were evaluated. The mean full CDL was 35.81 ± 1.22 mm in CT and 35.99 ± 1.94 mm in PC-CT (P = 0.77) Inter-observer reliability was poor for CT with an intra-correlation coefficient of 0.16 and moderate for PC-CT with an intra-correlation coefficient of 0.71.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated the advantages of PC-CT over conventional CT by improving the reliability and reproducibility of CDL measurements in patients.
期刊介绍:
Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.