Multifactor analysis of cost of injury using classification and regression trees.

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Roumen Vesselinov, Kartik Kaushik, Mark Scarboro, Joseph Kufera, Alicia Chavez, Komal Bhagat, Elena Vesselinov, Deborah Stein
{"title":"Multifactor analysis of cost of injury using classification and regression trees.","authors":"Roumen Vesselinov, Kartik Kaushik, Mark Scarboro, Joseph Kufera, Alicia Chavez, Komal Bhagat, Elena Vesselinov, Deborah Stein","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2547046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study we have two objectives: 1. To establish a dominant cost of injury structure. We perform an analysis of full medical cost for crash injuries including hospital charges and professional fees, to determine a cost structure model that can be extrapolated to higher level datasets. 2. To build multifactor models for cost of injury based on Classification and Regression Trees (CART) machine learning technique. This type of analytical tool gives us many advantages compared to other methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use two sources of data: the Maryland statewide hospital population data for 2017-2022, which includes hospital charges, and the trauma registry data from the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore, MD for 2016-2021, which includes hospital charges and professional fees. The hospital charges comprise of hospital bed occupancy fees, nursing support, medications and supplies, etc. Professional fees include doctors' fees at the hospital, rehabilitation, and therapy charges after hospital discharge. The injury severity is measured by the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) by body region and the maximum AIS when there is more than one injury in the same body region. The second injury severity measure is the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Overall, in the state of Maryland, hospital charges are reimbursed at 87%, while the professional fees are reimbursed at about 30%. We use the hospital charges and professional fee charges to estimate the cost of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most studies include only hospital costs, which underestimates the total injury cost. We discovered that hospital charges constitute on average 71% of the cost, while professional fees constitute 29%. We develop injury group classification, with four injury cost models based on CART: (i) with injury groups; (ii) without injury groups; (iii) full injury cost; and (iv) professional fees only. Each model identifies specific cost injury groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study finds that injury cost is the highest for polytrauma patients, followed by isolated injuries, and minor injuries. The machine learning analysis points to three unique findings: (1) The best predictor of cost is not a single factor but a combination of factors. (2) Injuries in Lower Extremities and Abdomen are very costly, while injuries to the Head region don't have immediate high cost but may have long-term cost effect. (3) Medical professional fees constitute about a third of injury costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2547046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study we have two objectives: 1. To establish a dominant cost of injury structure. We perform an analysis of full medical cost for crash injuries including hospital charges and professional fees, to determine a cost structure model that can be extrapolated to higher level datasets. 2. To build multifactor models for cost of injury based on Classification and Regression Trees (CART) machine learning technique. This type of analytical tool gives us many advantages compared to other methods.

Methods: We use two sources of data: the Maryland statewide hospital population data for 2017-2022, which includes hospital charges, and the trauma registry data from the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore, MD for 2016-2021, which includes hospital charges and professional fees. The hospital charges comprise of hospital bed occupancy fees, nursing support, medications and supplies, etc. Professional fees include doctors' fees at the hospital, rehabilitation, and therapy charges after hospital discharge. The injury severity is measured by the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) by body region and the maximum AIS when there is more than one injury in the same body region. The second injury severity measure is the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Overall, in the state of Maryland, hospital charges are reimbursed at 87%, while the professional fees are reimbursed at about 30%. We use the hospital charges and professional fee charges to estimate the cost of injury.

Results: Most studies include only hospital costs, which underestimates the total injury cost. We discovered that hospital charges constitute on average 71% of the cost, while professional fees constitute 29%. We develop injury group classification, with four injury cost models based on CART: (i) with injury groups; (ii) without injury groups; (iii) full injury cost; and (iv) professional fees only. Each model identifies specific cost injury groups.

Conclusions: The study finds that injury cost is the highest for polytrauma patients, followed by isolated injuries, and minor injuries. The machine learning analysis points to three unique findings: (1) The best predictor of cost is not a single factor but a combination of factors. (2) Injuries in Lower Extremities and Abdomen are very costly, while injuries to the Head region don't have immediate high cost but may have long-term cost effect. (3) Medical professional fees constitute about a third of injury costs.

基于分类树和回归树的多因素损伤成本分析。
在这项研究中,我们有两个目标:1。建立显性伤害成本结构。我们对碰撞伤害的全部医疗费用进行了分析,包括医院费用和专业费用,以确定可以外推到更高级别数据集的成本结构模型。2. 基于分类与回归树(CART)机器学习技术建立损伤成本的多因素模型。与其他方法相比,这种分析工具为我们提供了许多优势。方法:我们使用两个数据来源:2017-2022年马里兰州全州医院人口数据,包括医院收费,以及2016-2021年马里兰州巴尔的摩R. Adams Cowley休克创伤中心的创伤登记数据,包括医院收费和专业费用。医院收费包括医院床位占用费、护理支助、药品和用品等。专业费用包括医院的诊疗费、康复费和出院后的治疗费。损伤的严重程度是通过身体部位的简易损伤评分(AIS)来衡量的,当同一身体部位有多个损伤时,AIS的最大值是多少。第二个损伤严重程度测量是损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。总体而言,在马里兰州,住院费用报销率为87%,而专业费用报销率约为30%。我们使用医院收费和专业收费来估算伤害成本。结果:大多数研究只包括住院费用,低估了总伤害成本。我们发现医院费用平均占成本的71%,而专业费用占29%。我们建立了损伤组分类,并基于CART建立了四种损伤成本模型:(i)损伤组;(ii)无损伤组;(iii)全部伤害费用;(iv)仅支付专业费用。每个模型都确定了特定的成本伤害组。结论:本研究发现,多发伤患者的伤害成本最高,其次为孤立伤,轻伤。机器学习分析指出了三个独特的发现:(1)成本的最佳预测因素不是单一因素,而是多种因素的组合。(2)下肢和腹部的损伤是非常昂贵的,而头部区域的损伤不具有立即的高成本,但可能具有长期的成本效应。(3)医疗专业费用约占伤害费用的三分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信