Phantom and in vivo validation of a novel contactless registration method for robot-assisted SEEG surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Feng Hu, Xinwei Li, Shiqiang Wu, Wei Jiang, Kai Shu, Ting Lei
{"title":"Phantom and in vivo validation of a novel contactless registration method for robot-assisted SEEG surgery.","authors":"Feng Hu, Xinwei Li, Shiqiang Wu, Wei Jiang, Kai Shu, Ting Lei","doi":"10.1186/s41016-025-00401-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, robot-assisted stereotactic system has been widely used in stereo-electroencephalogram (SEEG) surgery. However, current registration mainly based on bone-fiducial registration (CBR) is limited by the inconvenient of repeated contact during the process. Here, a novel contactless optical-tracking registration (OTR) were applied for SEEG using robot-assisted stereotactic system. To demonstrate the accuracy and convenience of the novel OTR method compared with contact CBR method during the robot-assisted SEEG in phantom and animal model study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A head phantom and 12 Bama pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) with six under CBR and six under OTR were selected for the SEEG. Procedures were performed using the robot-assisted stereotactic system in different registration methods. The positioning error and time consumption during the registration process were assessed to compare the accuracy and convenience of OTR and CBR. Besides, two new users for the robot-assisted stereotactic system were selected for the learning curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean positioning errors in OTR group of the target and entry points were 1.68 ± 0.80 mm and 0.76 ± 0.39 mm. And in CBR group, mean positioning errors of the target and entry points were 1.49 ± 0.79 mm and 0.70 ± 0.33 mm. The registration time of OTR method (99.71 ± 1.08 s) was significantly shorter than that using CBR method (241.29 ± 28.95 s) (p value < 0.001). During the learning curve analysis, it is earlier for the users to go under OTR than CBR to reach a preferable entry error of 0.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The contactless OTR method can effectively reduce the time consumption during the registration process while maintaining the accuracy with CBR method. The novel method not only simplify the procedure by optical-tracking but also shorten the new user's learning curve compared with current method.</p>","PeriodicalId":36700,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-025-00401-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, robot-assisted stereotactic system has been widely used in stereo-electroencephalogram (SEEG) surgery. However, current registration mainly based on bone-fiducial registration (CBR) is limited by the inconvenient of repeated contact during the process. Here, a novel contactless optical-tracking registration (OTR) were applied for SEEG using robot-assisted stereotactic system. To demonstrate the accuracy and convenience of the novel OTR method compared with contact CBR method during the robot-assisted SEEG in phantom and animal model study.

Methods: A head phantom and 12 Bama pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) with six under CBR and six under OTR were selected for the SEEG. Procedures were performed using the robot-assisted stereotactic system in different registration methods. The positioning error and time consumption during the registration process were assessed to compare the accuracy and convenience of OTR and CBR. Besides, two new users for the robot-assisted stereotactic system were selected for the learning curve analysis.

Results: The mean positioning errors in OTR group of the target and entry points were 1.68 ± 0.80 mm and 0.76 ± 0.39 mm. And in CBR group, mean positioning errors of the target and entry points were 1.49 ± 0.79 mm and 0.70 ± 0.33 mm. The registration time of OTR method (99.71 ± 1.08 s) was significantly shorter than that using CBR method (241.29 ± 28.95 s) (p value < 0.001). During the learning curve analysis, it is earlier for the users to go under OTR than CBR to reach a preferable entry error of 0.5 mm.

Conclusion: The contactless OTR method can effectively reduce the time consumption during the registration process while maintaining the accuracy with CBR method. The novel method not only simplify the procedure by optical-tracking but also shorten the new user's learning curve compared with current method.

机器人辅助SEEG手术的新型非接触式注册方法的幻影和体内验证。
背景:近年来,机器人辅助立体定向系统在立体脑电图(SEEG)手术中得到了广泛应用。然而,目前以骨基准配准(CBR)为主的配准方法存在着不方便重复接触的缺点。本文采用机器人辅助立体定向系统,将一种新型的非接触式光跟踪配准应用于SEEG。通过与接触式CBR方法的比较,验证了该方法在机器人辅助SEEG和动物模型研究中的准确性和便捷性。方法:选择1头假体猪和12头巴马猪,其中6头在CBR下,6头在OTR下进行SEEG。使用机器人辅助立体定向系统在不同的配准方法下进行手术。评估了定位误差和配准过程中的时间消耗,比较了OTR和CBR的准确性和便捷性。此外,选择了两个机器人辅助立体定向系统的新用户进行学习曲线分析。结果:OTR组靶点和入点的平均定位误差分别为1.68±0.80 mm和0.76±0.39 mm。CBR组靶点和入点的平均定位误差分别为1.49±0.79 mm和0.70±0.33 mm。OTR法配准时间(99.71±1.08 s)明显短于CBR法(241.29±28.95 s) (p值)。结论:非接触式OTR法在保持CBR法配准精度的同时,可有效减少配准过程中的时间消耗。与现有方法相比,该方法不仅简化了光跟踪的操作过程,而且缩短了新用户的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信