Secondary analyses of swallowing efficiency and safety outcomes following thyroidectomy versus thyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection.

IF 1.8 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Molly A Knigge, Daniel Robbins, Susan Thibeault, Nadine Connor, Rebecca Sippel
{"title":"Secondary analyses of swallowing efficiency and safety outcomes following thyroidectomy versus thyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection.","authors":"Molly A Knigge, Daniel Robbins, Susan Thibeault, Nadine Connor, Rebecca Sippel","doi":"10.1186/s13044-025-00264-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Swallowing complaints are common following total thyroidectomy, though an exact mechanism of patient-reported swallowing symptoms following thyroidectomy is currently lacking. This secondary, blinded analysis of data collected in a randomized, controlled clinical trial hypothesized that patients randomly assigned to the central neck dissection group would exhibit increased aspiration and pharyngeal residue on videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation, and reduced patient-rated swallowing outcomes, as compared to patients randomized to thyroidectomy alone. We further hypothesized that blinded analysis would reveal worse swallowing function two-weeks post-surgery when compared to their pre-operative status to explain qualitative patient-reported dysphagia symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two participants randomized to total thyroidectomy treatment with or without central neck dissection underwent pre- and post-surgical evaluation of swallowing outcomes, including videofluoroscopic Penetration/Aspiration Scale ratings, Normalized Residue Ratio Scale measures of valleculae and pyriform sinus residue, and EAT-10 patient-rated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found post-surgery between randomized treatment groups for patient-rated EAT-10 scores (p = 0.2406), penetration/aspiration scale (p = 0.4465) or Normalized Residue Rating Scale scores for either vallecular or pyriform sinus sites. When group data were combined for analysis of differences between pre- and post-operative swallow performance, no statistically significant differences were found in patient-rated EAT-10 scores (p = 0.1374), penetration/aspiration scale (p = 0.7588) or Normalized Residue Rating Scale scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measures of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue failed to substantiate perceptions of post-operative dysphagia reported by patients undergoing total thyroidectomy with or without central neck dissection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02138214.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-025-00264-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Swallowing complaints are common following total thyroidectomy, though an exact mechanism of patient-reported swallowing symptoms following thyroidectomy is currently lacking. This secondary, blinded analysis of data collected in a randomized, controlled clinical trial hypothesized that patients randomly assigned to the central neck dissection group would exhibit increased aspiration and pharyngeal residue on videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation, and reduced patient-rated swallowing outcomes, as compared to patients randomized to thyroidectomy alone. We further hypothesized that blinded analysis would reveal worse swallowing function two-weeks post-surgery when compared to their pre-operative status to explain qualitative patient-reported dysphagia symptoms.

Methods: Thirty-two participants randomized to total thyroidectomy treatment with or without central neck dissection underwent pre- and post-surgical evaluation of swallowing outcomes, including videofluoroscopic Penetration/Aspiration Scale ratings, Normalized Residue Ratio Scale measures of valleculae and pyriform sinus residue, and EAT-10 patient-rated outcomes.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found post-surgery between randomized treatment groups for patient-rated EAT-10 scores (p = 0.2406), penetration/aspiration scale (p = 0.4465) or Normalized Residue Rating Scale scores for either vallecular or pyriform sinus sites. When group data were combined for analysis of differences between pre- and post-operative swallow performance, no statistically significant differences were found in patient-rated EAT-10 scores (p = 0.1374), penetration/aspiration scale (p = 0.7588) or Normalized Residue Rating Scale scores.

Conclusions: Measures of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue failed to substantiate perceptions of post-operative dysphagia reported by patients undergoing total thyroidectomy with or without central neck dissection.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02138214.

Abstract Image

甲状腺切除术与甲状腺切除术加预防性中央性颈部清扫术后吞咽效率和安全性的二次分析。
背景:甲状腺全切除术后吞咽症状很常见,尽管目前缺乏患者报告的甲状腺切除术后吞咽症状的确切机制。这项对随机对照临床试验收集的数据进行的二次盲法分析假设,与随机接受甲状腺切除术的患者相比,随机分配到中央颈部清扫组的患者在影像透视吞咽评估中会出现更多的误吸和咽残留物,并降低患者对吞咽结果的评价。我们进一步假设,盲法分析将显示术后两周吞咽功能较术前恶化,以解释定性患者报告的吞咽困难症状。方法:32名随机接受甲状腺全切除术并伴有或不伴有中央性颈部清扫的患者接受了术前和术后的吞咽结果评估,包括透视透视穿透/吸入量表评分、小囊和梨状窦残留物归一化残留比量表测量以及EAT-10患者评分结果。结果:术后随机治疗组之间患者评分的EAT-10评分(p = 0.2406)、穿刺/抽吸评分(p = 0.4465)或归一化残差评定量表(归一化残差评定量表)对小静脉或梨状窦部位的评分均无统计学差异。当将组内数据合并分析术前和术后吞咽表现的差异时,患者评分的EAT-10评分(p = 0.1374)、渗透/吸入评分(p = 0.7588)或归一化残留评定量表评分均无统计学差异。结论:穿透/吸入和咽残留的测量不能证实接受甲状腺全切除术伴或不伴中央颈部清扫的患者术后吞咽困难的感觉。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT02138214。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid Research
Thyroid Research Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信