Kamil Wolos, Leszek Pstras, Urszula Bialonczyk, Malgorzata Debowska, Wojciech Dabrowski, Dorota Siwicka-Gieroba, Jan Poleszczuk
{"title":"Personalized pulse wave propagation modeling to improve vasopressor dosing management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Kamil Wolos, Leszek Pstras, Urszula Bialonczyk, Malgorzata Debowska, Wojciech Dabrowski, Dorota Siwicka-Gieroba, Jan Poleszczuk","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates whether examining the shape of arterial pulse waves and fitting to them a physiology-based mathematical model of pulse wave propagation can provide additional insights into the state of the cardiovascular system in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), potentially enhancing vasopressor dosing strategies. We conducted a longitudinal study on 25 sTBI patients in an intensive care unit. Arterial pulse waves were recorded non-invasively from wrists and ankles using an oscillometric method and were used to inform a 0-1D model of the arterial blood flow dynamics. Model-estimated, patient-specific cardiovascular parameters were then used in a statistical model to predict changes in the administered dose of vasopressor (norepinephrine) in the next 24 hours. The model fits to the recorded pulse waves were satisfactory, with the coefficients of determination ([Formula: see text]) of approximately 0.9 and the differences between the measured and model-estimated mean arterial pressure of 0.1 ± 1.0 mmHg ([Formula: see text]=0.99). Except for a few patients, we found no clear association between the model-estimated parameters and norepinephrine dose at the time of pulse wave recording. Nevertheless, our predictive model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.85 when trained and tested on the entire dataset and 0.76 when using the leave-one-out cross-validation, with 8 misclassifications among the total of 77 observations. Thus, despite the known inter-patient variability of hemodynamic response to vasopressors, the proposed method allowed predicting the direction of norepinephrine dose changes in the next 24 hours with satisfactory accuracy. Subject to further studies and extensive validation, our approach could inform a decision-support tool for optimizing vasopressor dosing on a per-patient basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 9","pages":"e1013501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates whether examining the shape of arterial pulse waves and fitting to them a physiology-based mathematical model of pulse wave propagation can provide additional insights into the state of the cardiovascular system in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), potentially enhancing vasopressor dosing strategies. We conducted a longitudinal study on 25 sTBI patients in an intensive care unit. Arterial pulse waves were recorded non-invasively from wrists and ankles using an oscillometric method and were used to inform a 0-1D model of the arterial blood flow dynamics. Model-estimated, patient-specific cardiovascular parameters were then used in a statistical model to predict changes in the administered dose of vasopressor (norepinephrine) in the next 24 hours. The model fits to the recorded pulse waves were satisfactory, with the coefficients of determination ([Formula: see text]) of approximately 0.9 and the differences between the measured and model-estimated mean arterial pressure of 0.1 ± 1.0 mmHg ([Formula: see text]=0.99). Except for a few patients, we found no clear association between the model-estimated parameters and norepinephrine dose at the time of pulse wave recording. Nevertheless, our predictive model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.85 when trained and tested on the entire dataset and 0.76 when using the leave-one-out cross-validation, with 8 misclassifications among the total of 77 observations. Thus, despite the known inter-patient variability of hemodynamic response to vasopressors, the proposed method allowed predicting the direction of norepinephrine dose changes in the next 24 hours with satisfactory accuracy. Subject to further studies and extensive validation, our approach could inform a decision-support tool for optimizing vasopressor dosing on a per-patient basis.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery.
Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines.
Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights.
Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology.
Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.