Establishing Diagnostic Cut-Off Scores for the Perceived Cognitive Impairment Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 in Portuguese Cancer Survivors.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ana F Oliveira, Sofia A Marques-Fernandes, Ana Bártolo, Pedro Bem-Haja, Ana Torres, Isabel M Santos
{"title":"Establishing Diagnostic Cut-Off Scores for the Perceived Cognitive Impairment Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 in Portuguese Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Ana F Oliveira, Sofia A Marques-Fernandes, Ana Bártolo, Pedro Bem-Haja, Ana Torres, Isabel M Santos","doi":"10.1002/pon.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) negatively impacts the quality of life of non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancer survivors. Detecting these cognitive changes remains challenging due to the lack of standardized CRCI classification and detection criteria. This study aimed to establish cut-off scores for the perceived cognitive impairment (CogPCI) subscale of the European Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 (FACT-Cog-v3).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 266 Portuguese-speaking non-CNS cancer survivors and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the CogPCI subscale of the FACT-Cog-v3 to detect meaningful perceived CRCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CogPCI subscale demonstrated good screening performance in identifying individuals with and without clinically relevant CRCI, as indicated by a moderate-to-high area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.87. A suggested optimal cut-off score of < 51 provided good sensitivity (81.2%) and specificity (78.9%) for CogPCI to differentiate between the two groups. Over half of the participants reported significant cognitive complaints, highlighting the urgent need for standardized cognitive assessments in oncology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes valuable insights into the early and fast detection and intervention of CRCI in Portugal. Using a brief, validated, self-report cognitive assessment tool can enhance the management of cognitive symptoms in non-CNS cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) negatively impacts the quality of life of non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancer survivors. Detecting these cognitive changes remains challenging due to the lack of standardized CRCI classification and detection criteria. This study aimed to establish cut-off scores for the perceived cognitive impairment (CogPCI) subscale of the European Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 (FACT-Cog-v3).

Methods: We analyzed data from 266 Portuguese-speaking non-CNS cancer survivors and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the CogPCI subscale of the FACT-Cog-v3 to detect meaningful perceived CRCI.

Results: The CogPCI subscale demonstrated good screening performance in identifying individuals with and without clinically relevant CRCI, as indicated by a moderate-to-high area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.87. A suggested optimal cut-off score of < 51 provided good sensitivity (81.2%) and specificity (78.9%) for CogPCI to differentiate between the two groups. Over half of the participants reported significant cognitive complaints, highlighting the urgent need for standardized cognitive assessments in oncology.

Conclusions: This study contributes valuable insights into the early and fast detection and intervention of CRCI in Portugal. Using a brief, validated, self-report cognitive assessment tool can enhance the management of cognitive symptoms in non-CNS cancer survivors.

Abstract Image

在葡萄牙癌症幸存者的癌症治疗功能评估-认知功能-版本3中建立感知认知障碍亚量表的诊断截止分数。
目的:癌症相关认知障碍(CRCI)会对非中枢神经系统(non-CNS)癌症幸存者的生活质量产生负面影响。由于缺乏标准化的CRCI分类和检测标准,检测这些认知变化仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在建立欧洲葡萄牙语版癌症治疗功能评估-认知功能-第3版(FACT-Cog-v3)的感知认知障碍(CogPCI)子量表的截止分数。方法:我们分析了266名葡萄牙语非中枢神经系统癌症幸存者的数据,并进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以评估FACT-Cog-v3的CogPCI分量表检测有意义感知CRCI的诊断有效性。结果:CogPCI量表在识别有和没有临床相关CRCI的个体方面表现出良好的筛查效果,曲线下面积(AUC)得分为0.87。建议的最佳临界值< 51为区分两组的CogPCI提供了良好的敏感性(81.2%)和特异性(78.9%)。超过一半的参与者报告了显著的认知抱怨,强调了肿瘤学中标准化认知评估的迫切需要。结论:本研究为葡萄牙CRCI的早期快速检测和干预提供了有价值的见解。使用一个简短的、有效的、自我报告的认知评估工具可以增强非中枢神经系统癌症幸存者的认知症状的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信