Examining the association between perceived partner commitment and relationship feelings among anxiously attached people at the daily level.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Alexandra E Black
{"title":"Examining the association between perceived partner commitment and relationship feelings among anxiously attached people at the daily level.","authors":"Alexandra E Black","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2025.2550025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Attachment Security Enhancement Model proposes that a romantic partner reassuring an anxiously attached person of their commitment can help deescalate negative feelings (i.e. an interpersonal process). However, this can be taxing on the partner and requires the anxious person to accurately detect the partner's buffering attempts. Instead, it may be beneficial for anxious people to consistently perceive greater partner commitment on their own (i.e. an intrapersonal process) to promote relationship quality. The current study incorporated a dyadic diary design. On days in which highly anxious participants perceived greater partner commitment, they reported greater positive relationship feelings; less anxious (i.e. secure) and avoidant participants did not exhibit this pattern. These results add to the existing literature on attachment buffering by providing preliminary evidence of daily perceived partner commitment as one possible defense against erosion of relationship satisfaction due to high levels of attachment anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2025.2550025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Attachment Security Enhancement Model proposes that a romantic partner reassuring an anxiously attached person of their commitment can help deescalate negative feelings (i.e. an interpersonal process). However, this can be taxing on the partner and requires the anxious person to accurately detect the partner's buffering attempts. Instead, it may be beneficial for anxious people to consistently perceive greater partner commitment on their own (i.e. an intrapersonal process) to promote relationship quality. The current study incorporated a dyadic diary design. On days in which highly anxious participants perceived greater partner commitment, they reported greater positive relationship feelings; less anxious (i.e. secure) and avoidant participants did not exhibit this pattern. These results add to the existing literature on attachment buffering by providing preliminary evidence of daily perceived partner commitment as one possible defense against erosion of relationship satisfaction due to high levels of attachment anxiety.

在日常水平上研究焦虑依恋者感知伴侣承诺与关系感受之间的联系。
依恋安全增强模型提出,浪漫的伴侣向焦虑的依恋者保证他们的承诺可以帮助降低负面情绪(即人际关系过程)。然而,这对伴侣来说是一种负担,需要焦虑的人准确地察觉到伴侣的缓冲尝试。相反,对于焦虑的人来说,始终如一地感知自己对伴侣的承诺(即一个人际过程),以提高关系质量,可能是有益的。本研究采用二元日记设计。在高度焦虑的参与者感受到更多伴侣承诺的日子里,他们报告了更积极的关系感受;不那么焦虑(即安全)和回避型参与者没有表现出这种模式。这些结果补充了现有的关于依恋缓冲的文献,为日常感知伴侣承诺提供了初步证据,作为一种可能的防御,防止由于高度的依恋焦虑而导致的关系满意度的侵蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social Psychology
Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信