Assessment of Ocular Torsion in Exotropic Patients Following Horizontal Strabismus Surgery: A Comparative Analysis Using Conventional Color Fundus Photography and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/1477145
Kaveh Abri Aghdam, Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi, Amin Zand, Mostafa Soltan Sanjari, Ali Sadeghi, Vahid Zare Hosseinabadi, Seyed Ali Sonbolestan
{"title":"Assessment of Ocular Torsion in Exotropic Patients Following Horizontal Strabismus Surgery: A Comparative Analysis Using Conventional Color Fundus Photography and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography.","authors":"Kaveh Abri Aghdam, Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi, Amin Zand, Mostafa Soltan Sanjari, Ali Sadeghi, Vahid Zare Hosseinabadi, Seyed Ali Sonbolestan","doi":"10.1155/joph/1477145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To objectively evaluate ocular cycloposition using conventional color fundus photography (CFP) and Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) in exotropic patients undergoing horizontal strabismus surgery and to assess the agreement between these methods. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether surgery alters ocular torsion in pure exotropia. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, single-center study, 42 eyes from 21 patients with exotropia requiring bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession were evaluated. The disc-center fovea angle (DFA) was measured pre- and postoperatively using CFP (Topcon fundus camera) and Spectralis OCT with fovea-to-disc (FoDi) alignment software. <b>Results:</b> The angle of exodeviation improved significantly postoperatively, from 35.10 ± 7.89 to 3.76 ± 3.73 prism diopters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Both CFP- and OCT-derived DFA values remained stable in both eyes at 6 months (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons). No significant differences were observed between CFP and OCT measurements at baseline or postoperatively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Preoperative intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between methods was strong (right eye: 0.765; left eye: 0.750), decreasing postoperatively to moderate levels (right eye: 0.618; left eye: 0.661). <b>Conclusion:</b> Horizontal strabismus surgery does not significantly alter ocular torsion in pure exotropia. Spectralis OCT reliably quantifies cyclotorsion but may yield marginally lower DFA values compared to CFP, despite no statistical difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1477145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/1477145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To objectively evaluate ocular cycloposition using conventional color fundus photography (CFP) and Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) in exotropic patients undergoing horizontal strabismus surgery and to assess the agreement between these methods. Additionally, we aimed to determine whether surgery alters ocular torsion in pure exotropia. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 42 eyes from 21 patients with exotropia requiring bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession were evaluated. The disc-center fovea angle (DFA) was measured pre- and postoperatively using CFP (Topcon fundus camera) and Spectralis OCT with fovea-to-disc (FoDi) alignment software. Results: The angle of exodeviation improved significantly postoperatively, from 35.10 ± 7.89 to 3.76 ± 3.73 prism diopters (p < 0.001). Both CFP- and OCT-derived DFA values remained stable in both eyes at 6 months (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). No significant differences were observed between CFP and OCT measurements at baseline or postoperatively (p > 0.05). Preoperative intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between methods was strong (right eye: 0.765; left eye: 0.750), decreasing postoperatively to moderate levels (right eye: 0.618; left eye: 0.661). Conclusion: Horizontal strabismus surgery does not significantly alter ocular torsion in pure exotropia. Spectralis OCT reliably quantifies cyclotorsion but may yield marginally lower DFA values compared to CFP, despite no statistical difference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

水平斜视手术后外斜视患者眼扭转的评估:常规彩色眼底摄影和光谱光学相干断层扫描的比较分析。
目的:客观评价常规彩色眼底摄影(CFP)和光谱光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在外倾性水平斜视手术患者中的眼环定位,并评价两者之间的一致性。此外,我们的目的是确定手术是否会改变纯外斜视的眼扭转。方法:在这项前瞻性的单中心研究中,对21例需要双侧直肌收缩的外斜视患者的42只眼进行了评估。术前和术后采用CFP (Topcon眼底相机)和Spectralis OCT (FoDi)对准软件测量椎间盘中心中央凹角(DFA)。结果:术后外偏角明显改善,棱镜屈光度由35.10±7.89降至3.76±3.73 (p < 0.001)。6个月时,CFP和oct衍生的双眼DFA值保持稳定(所有比较p < 0.05)。基线或术后CFP和OCT测量无显著差异(p < 0.05)。术前两种方法间的类内相关系数(ICC)较强(右眼:0.765,左眼:0.750),术后降低至中等水平(右眼:0.618,左眼:0.661)。结论:水平斜视手术对单纯外斜视患者的眼扭转无明显影响。Spectralis OCT可靠地量化了旋回扭转,但与CFP相比,DFA值可能略低,尽管没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信