Vladimir Kojovic, Marko Marjanovic, Predrag Ilic, Ana Cvetinovic, Sava Cvetinovic, Emre Cico
{"title":"Surgical approaches for distal urethral strictures after failed hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vladimir Kojovic, Marko Marjanovic, Predrag Ilic, Ana Cvetinovic, Sava Cvetinovic, Emre Cico","doi":"10.1038/s41443-025-01167-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urethral stricture is a frequent complication following hypospadias repair, often complicated by scarring, anatomical distortion, and poor tissue vascularity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated outcomes of single-stage versus staged urethroplasty for distal urethral strictures after failed hypospadias repair. A total of 20 studies were analyzed. Data were extracted regarding surgical techniques, success rates, complications, and duration of follow-up. Meta-analysis showed a pooled success rate of 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2-84.4%) for single-stage and 76.2% (95% CI: 52.1-90.4%) for staged procedures. The difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Single-stage repairs were generally associated with shorter treatment durations, while staged approaches were preferred in cases with severe fibrosis or poor tissue quality. Complication rates ranged from 10% to 50%. In staged procedures, the use of buccal mucosa grafts yielded better outcomes compared to skin flaps or other grafts. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I² = 65.2% for single-stage, I² = 90.1% for staged; p < 0.01), likely due to variability in surgical techniques, patient demographics, and follow-up protocols. No publication bias was detected (Egger's test p = 0.398 and 0.388, respectively). Further standardized, prospective studies are necessary to optimize treatment selection and to enhance surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01167-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urethral stricture is a frequent complication following hypospadias repair, often complicated by scarring, anatomical distortion, and poor tissue vascularity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated outcomes of single-stage versus staged urethroplasty for distal urethral strictures after failed hypospadias repair. A total of 20 studies were analyzed. Data were extracted regarding surgical techniques, success rates, complications, and duration of follow-up. Meta-analysis showed a pooled success rate of 78.1% (95% CI: 70.2-84.4%) for single-stage and 76.2% (95% CI: 52.1-90.4%) for staged procedures. The difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Single-stage repairs were generally associated with shorter treatment durations, while staged approaches were preferred in cases with severe fibrosis or poor tissue quality. Complication rates ranged from 10% to 50%. In staged procedures, the use of buccal mucosa grafts yielded better outcomes compared to skin flaps or other grafts. Significant heterogeneity was observed (I² = 65.2% for single-stage, I² = 90.1% for staged; p < 0.01), likely due to variability in surgical techniques, patient demographics, and follow-up protocols. No publication bias was detected (Egger's test p = 0.398 and 0.388, respectively). Further standardized, prospective studies are necessary to optimize treatment selection and to enhance surgical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.