Long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yoshiaki Ando, Minoru Kato, Yasuhiro Tani, Tomoya Ueda, Gentaro Tanabe, Yuta Fujimoto, Noriaki Ito, Nobutoshi Tsukuda, Kazuki Matsuyama, Muneshin Morita, Shunsuke Yoshii, Satoki Shichijo, Takashi Kanesaka, Sachiko Yamamoto, Koji Higashino, Noriya Uedo, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara
{"title":"Long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Yoshiaki Ando, Minoru Kato, Yasuhiro Tani, Tomoya Ueda, Gentaro Tanabe, Yuta Fujimoto, Noriaki Ito, Nobutoshi Tsukuda, Kazuki Matsuyama, Muneshin Morita, Shunsuke Yoshii, Satoki Shichijo, Takashi Kanesaka, Sachiko Yamamoto, Koji Higashino, Noriya Uedo, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Data on long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. We investigated long-term outcomes of ER for superficial cervical ESCC by stratifying lesions based on invasion depth and lymphovascular involvement (LVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 131 patients who underwent ER for T1 cervical ESCC were divided into three groups based on final pathological diagnosis: pT1a-EP/LPM without LVI (group A, 103 patients), pT1a-MM without LVI (group B, 10 patients), and pT1a-MM with LVI or pT1b-SM1/SM2 (group C, 18 patients). Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median observation period was 64 months. In the groups A and B, none of the patients received additional therapy after ER and none had metastatic recurrence. In the group C, 14 of 18 patients received additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after ER, while the remaining four patients did not. Of the 14 patients who received additional CRT, one (7%) had local and lymph node recurrence, resulting in cervical ESCC-related death. One of the four patients (25%) who did not receive additional CRT had lymph node recurrence, but was salvaged by lymphadenectomy and CRT. The 5-year OS in the group A, B, and C was 90%, 100%, and 75% (P=0.06), the 5-year DSS was 100%, 100%, and 92% (P=0.046), and the 5-year RFS was 90%, 100%, and 69% (P=0.02), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The long-term outcomes following ER for cervical ESCC in this study were comparable to those previously reported for thoracic ESCC in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.09.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Data on long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. We investigated long-term outcomes of ER for superficial cervical ESCC by stratifying lesions based on invasion depth and lymphovascular involvement (LVI).

Methods: A total of 131 patients who underwent ER for T1 cervical ESCC were divided into three groups based on final pathological diagnosis: pT1a-EP/LPM without LVI (group A, 103 patients), pT1a-MM without LVI (group B, 10 patients), and pT1a-MM with LVI or pT1b-SM1/SM2 (group C, 18 patients). Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among the groups.

Results: The median observation period was 64 months. In the groups A and B, none of the patients received additional therapy after ER and none had metastatic recurrence. In the group C, 14 of 18 patients received additional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after ER, while the remaining four patients did not. Of the 14 patients who received additional CRT, one (7%) had local and lymph node recurrence, resulting in cervical ESCC-related death. One of the four patients (25%) who did not receive additional CRT had lymph node recurrence, but was salvaged by lymphadenectomy and CRT. The 5-year OS in the group A, B, and C was 90%, 100%, and 75% (P=0.06), the 5-year DSS was 100%, 100%, and 92% (P=0.046), and the 5-year RFS was 90%, 100%, and 69% (P=0.02), respectively.

Conclusions: The long-term outcomes following ER for cervical ESCC in this study were comparable to those previously reported for thoracic ESCC in the literature.

宫颈食管鳞状细胞癌内镜切除术后的远期疗效。
背景和目的:内镜切除(ER)治疗宫颈食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的长期预后数据有限。我们根据浸润深度和淋巴血管受累(LVI)对宫颈ESCC进行分层,研究ER治疗浅表ESCC的长期疗效。方法:131例T1期宫颈ESCC患者根据最终病理诊断分为3组:pT1a-EP/LPM不伴LVI (A组,103例)、pT1a-MM不伴LVI (B组,10例)、pT1a-MM伴LVI或pT1b-SM1/SM2 (C组,18例)。比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。结果:中位观察期64个月。在A组和B组中,没有患者在ER后接受额外治疗,也没有患者发生转移性复发。在C组,18例患者中有14例在ER后接受了额外的放化疗(CRT),而其余4例患者没有。在接受额外CRT的14例患者中,1例(7%)出现局部和淋巴结复发,导致宫颈escc相关死亡。4例未接受额外CRT的患者中有1例(25%)淋巴结复发,但通过淋巴结切除术和CRT得以挽救。A、B、C组5年OS分别为90%、100%、75% (P=0.06), 5年DSS分别为100%、100%、92% (P=0.046), 5年RFS分别为90%、100%、69% (P=0.02)。结论:本研究中,ER治疗宫颈ESCC的长期结果与文献中先前报道的胸部ESCC相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信