Prenatal assessment of fetal vertebrae and ribs by three-dimensional ultrasound and the association with fetal and neonatal outcome.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Pauline C Schut, Titia E Cohen-Overbeek, Tom J M van Dooren, Annelieke Hijkoop, Marjolein H G Dremmen, Erwin Brosens, Frietson Galis, Alex J Eggink
{"title":"Prenatal assessment of fetal vertebrae and ribs by three-dimensional ultrasound and the association with fetal and neonatal outcome.","authors":"Pauline C Schut, Titia E Cohen-Overbeek, Tom J M van Dooren, Annelieke Hijkoop, Marjolein H G Dremmen, Erwin Brosens, Frietson Galis, Alex J Eggink","doi":"10.1159/000548341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of an abnormal vertebral pattern and (rudimentary) cervical ribs in particular, has been associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, such as intrauterine fetal death and structural or chromosomal abnormalities. The feasibility and potential added value of prenatal assessment of the vertebral pattern and the presence of cervical ribs is currently unclear. Aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of prenatal assessment of the fetal vertebral pattern and cervical ribs using three-dimensional ultrasound and determine whether an abnormal vertebral pattern is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1138 Women referred for an advanced ultrasound examination were included and volume data sets of the spine were acquired. The vertebral pattern was reassessed on postnatal radiographic examinations, when available. Associations between adverse outcomes and abnormalities of the vertebral pattern that had at least a good agreement between prenatal and postnatal assessments were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between prenatal and postnatal assessment of the presence of cervical ribs was poor, which also applied to assessment of the complete vertebral pattern. Moderate to fair agreement existed between prenatal and postnatal assessments of thoracic rib number. Prenatal and postnatal assessments of lumbar ribs had a very good agreement. Lumbar ribs were rare (10/768, 1.3%) and associated with female gender, but not with any other variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lumbar ribs could be assessed very well on prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound and were not associated with adverse outcomes. Prenatal and postnatal agreement between the presence of cervical ribs, number of thoracic ribs and the vertebral pattern was insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The presence of an abnormal vertebral pattern and (rudimentary) cervical ribs in particular, has been associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, such as intrauterine fetal death and structural or chromosomal abnormalities. The feasibility and potential added value of prenatal assessment of the vertebral pattern and the presence of cervical ribs is currently unclear. Aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of prenatal assessment of the fetal vertebral pattern and cervical ribs using three-dimensional ultrasound and determine whether an abnormal vertebral pattern is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcome.

Methods: 1138 Women referred for an advanced ultrasound examination were included and volume data sets of the spine were acquired. The vertebral pattern was reassessed on postnatal radiographic examinations, when available. Associations between adverse outcomes and abnormalities of the vertebral pattern that had at least a good agreement between prenatal and postnatal assessments were studied.

Results: Agreement between prenatal and postnatal assessment of the presence of cervical ribs was poor, which also applied to assessment of the complete vertebral pattern. Moderate to fair agreement existed between prenatal and postnatal assessments of thoracic rib number. Prenatal and postnatal assessments of lumbar ribs had a very good agreement. Lumbar ribs were rare (10/768, 1.3%) and associated with female gender, but not with any other variable.

Conclusion: Lumbar ribs could be assessed very well on prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound and were not associated with adverse outcomes. Prenatal and postnatal agreement between the presence of cervical ribs, number of thoracic ribs and the vertebral pattern was insufficient.

胎儿椎骨和肋骨的三维超声产前评估及其与胎儿和新生儿结局的关系。
存在异常的椎体模式,特别是(未发育的)颈肋,与胎儿和新生儿的不良结局有关,如宫内胎儿死亡和结构或染色体异常。目前尚不清楚产前评估椎体形态和颈肋存在的可行性和潜在的附加价值。本研究的目的是评估利用三维超声对胎儿椎体形态和颈肋进行产前评估的可行性,并确定异常椎体形态是否与胎儿和新生儿的不良结局有关。方法:纳入1138名接受高级超声检查的妇女,并获得脊柱的体积数据集。如果可以的话,在产后x线检查中重新评估椎体模式。研究了不良结果与椎体模式异常之间的关联,这些异常在产前和产后评估中至少有很好的一致性。结果:产前和产后对颈肋存在的评估一致性较差,这也适用于完整椎体模式的评估。产前和产后胸椎肋骨数的评估之间存在中度到公平的一致性。产前和产后腰椎的评估有很好的一致性。腰椎肋骨罕见(10/768,1.3%),与女性相关,但与其他变量无关。结论:产前三维超声可以很好地评估腰椎,与不良结局无关。产前和产后颈椎肋骨、胸椎肋骨数量和椎体模式之间的一致性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信