Conspiracy theories, personality dimensions and personality disorders.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Vladan Starcevic, Aleksandar Janca
{"title":"Conspiracy theories, personality dimensions and personality disorders.","authors":"Vladan Starcevic, Aleksandar Janca","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Conspiracy theories are not a recent phenomenon, but their dissemination has been facilitated by the internet and modern means of communication such as social media. This article reviews personality-based factors that increase the likelihood of endorsing conspiracy theories.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most studies used a correlational approach and examined personality traits and dimensions rather than personality disorders. The strongest and most consistent relationships were found between endorsement of conspiracy theories and suspiciousness and paranoid ideation, pseudoscientific tendencies and beliefs, schizotypal personality traits and narcissism. Similar personality characteristics were identified as correlates of the endorsement of the specific COVID-19 conspiracy theories, but antisocial personality traits have also been reported in this context. Epistemic mistrust has emerged as arguably the key factor that facilitates endorsement of conspiracy theories. Schizotypal, paranoid, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders were more likely to accompany endorsement of conspiracy theories than other types of personality disorders.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although correlation does not imply causation, recent work has identified personality-related characteristics that confer an increased risk of espousing conspiracy theories. Further research is necessary to ascertain how this vulnerability could be decreased, thus minimizing the harms of conspiracy theories that are inflicted on their adherents and broader society.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Conspiracy theories are not a recent phenomenon, but their dissemination has been facilitated by the internet and modern means of communication such as social media. This article reviews personality-based factors that increase the likelihood of endorsing conspiracy theories.

Recent findings: Most studies used a correlational approach and examined personality traits and dimensions rather than personality disorders. The strongest and most consistent relationships were found between endorsement of conspiracy theories and suspiciousness and paranoid ideation, pseudoscientific tendencies and beliefs, schizotypal personality traits and narcissism. Similar personality characteristics were identified as correlates of the endorsement of the specific COVID-19 conspiracy theories, but antisocial personality traits have also been reported in this context. Epistemic mistrust has emerged as arguably the key factor that facilitates endorsement of conspiracy theories. Schizotypal, paranoid, antisocial, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders were more likely to accompany endorsement of conspiracy theories than other types of personality disorders.

Summary: Although correlation does not imply causation, recent work has identified personality-related characteristics that confer an increased risk of espousing conspiracy theories. Further research is necessary to ascertain how this vulnerability could be decreased, thus minimizing the harms of conspiracy theories that are inflicted on their adherents and broader society.

阴谋论,人格维度和人格障碍。
综述目的:阴谋论不是最近才出现的现象,但互联网和社交媒体等现代通信手段促进了阴谋论的传播。这篇文章回顾了基于个性的因素,这些因素增加了支持阴谋论的可能性。最近的发现:大多数研究使用相关性方法,检查人格特征和维度,而不是人格障碍。研究发现,认同阴谋论与多疑和偏执观念、伪科学倾向和信仰、分裂型人格特征和自恋之间存在最强烈、最一致的关系。相似的人格特征被确定为支持特定的COVID-19阴谋论的相关因素,但在这种情况下也报告了反社会人格特征。认知上的不信任可以说是促成阴谋论得到认可的关键因素。与其他类型的人格障碍相比,分裂型、偏执型、反社会型、边缘型和自恋型人格障碍更有可能伴随着阴谋论的认可。摘要:虽然相关性并不意味着因果关系,但最近的研究已经确定了与人格相关的特征,这些特征赋予了支持阴谋论的风险增加。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定如何减少这种脆弱性,从而最大限度地减少阴谋论对其追随者和更广泛社会造成的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信