Laura Colombo, Anna Elisabeth Steinberg, Sanjay Hadigal
{"title":"High-dose influenza vaccine for elderly: a closer look into the real-world data.","authors":"Laura Colombo, Anna Elisabeth Steinberg, Sanjay Hadigal","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2559871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults are at increased risk of severe illness, hospitalization, and death due to influenza, making vaccination a key public health strategy. High-dose (HD) influenza vaccine has been recommended in several European countries to enhance protection in this vulnerable group. While clinical trials and observational studies have reported improved effectiveness of HD vaccine in preventing influenza-related outcomes, this advantage appears most consistent in individuals aged 75 and older. In contrast, evidence supporting the superiority of HD vaccine over standard-dose (SD) vaccines in the 65-74 age group (the \"young-old\") is limited and often not statistically significant. This review examined real-world effectiveness data comparing HD and SD influenza vaccines in elderly populations. While HD vaccines may provide added protection in the oldest age groups, SD vaccines continue to offer substantial and reliable protection, particularly among the 60-74 age range. HD vaccine is associated with higher rates of mild side effects and carries a significantly greater cost, which may limit its cost-effectiveness for broad use in the younger elderly population. Given that the majority of elderly individuals in developed countries fall within the 65-74 age group, a tailored vaccination approach may be more appropriate. Recommending HD vaccine primarily for those aged 75 and older, while offering SD vaccines to younger seniors, may help increase vaccine coverage without compromising protection. More real-world, age-stratified studies are needed to guide vaccination policies. Ultimately, any influenza vaccine is better than none, and SD vaccines remain an effective and accessible option for most older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2559871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Older adults are at increased risk of severe illness, hospitalization, and death due to influenza, making vaccination a key public health strategy. High-dose (HD) influenza vaccine has been recommended in several European countries to enhance protection in this vulnerable group. While clinical trials and observational studies have reported improved effectiveness of HD vaccine in preventing influenza-related outcomes, this advantage appears most consistent in individuals aged 75 and older. In contrast, evidence supporting the superiority of HD vaccine over standard-dose (SD) vaccines in the 65-74 age group (the "young-old") is limited and often not statistically significant. This review examined real-world effectiveness data comparing HD and SD influenza vaccines in elderly populations. While HD vaccines may provide added protection in the oldest age groups, SD vaccines continue to offer substantial and reliable protection, particularly among the 60-74 age range. HD vaccine is associated with higher rates of mild side effects and carries a significantly greater cost, which may limit its cost-effectiveness for broad use in the younger elderly population. Given that the majority of elderly individuals in developed countries fall within the 65-74 age group, a tailored vaccination approach may be more appropriate. Recommending HD vaccine primarily for those aged 75 and older, while offering SD vaccines to younger seniors, may help increase vaccine coverage without compromising protection. More real-world, age-stratified studies are needed to guide vaccination policies. Ultimately, any influenza vaccine is better than none, and SD vaccines remain an effective and accessible option for most older adults.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance