Anterior Closed Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Slope Correction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: A Preliminary Report of 100 Cases at a 2-Year Follow-up.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jörg Dickschas, Ilona Schubert, Michael Wagner, Lukas Biedermann, Michael Simon, Andreas Weiler
{"title":"Anterior Closed Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Slope Correction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: A Preliminary Report of 100 Cases at a 2-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Jörg Dickschas, Ilona Schubert, Michael Wagner, Lukas Biedermann, Michael Simon, Andreas Weiler","doi":"10.1177/19476035251364704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical RelevanceIn recent years, an increased posterior tibial slope has been identified as a nonmodifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and increased failure rates after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). To date, the literature consists of clinical case series on slope reducing high tibial osteotomies and reports promising clinical results. However, higher case numbers are still lacking. The goal of the present series of anterior-closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies (ACW-HTO) was to analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a minimum of 2 years. It was hypothesized that an ACW-HTO with secondary ACLR after failed ACL surgery improves clinical outcome as compared with the pre-osteotomy state or can even give sufficient stability to avoid the need for revision ACLR.Material and methodsOne hundred consecutive cases with an ACW-HTO operated between February 2019 and December 2022 were included in 2 surgical centers (57 cases radiographic/51 cases with PROMs Sozialstiftung Bamberg and 43 cases radiographic/35 cases with PROMs Sporthopaedicum Berlin, Germany). The pre-injury (before first injury), the preoperative (before ACW-HTO), and the final postoperative conditions were documented using PROMs.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 36 months (SD ±11, range 24-82), the follow-up rate for the PROMs was 85%. The mean preoperative slope of 14.6° (SD ±2.4°; range 11°-28°), measured according to the method of Dejour and Bonnin, was corrected to a mean of 6.8° (SD ±2.0°; range 0°-12°), <i>P</i> < 0.0001. No relevant complications were noted and no recurrent ACL graft failure was reported within the full follow-up period. Twenty-one patients had not received a revision ACLR after ACW-HTO at final follow-up due to sufficient stability. Prior to the first ACL injury, the mean Tegner activity scale was 7.3 points (SD ±1.7; 3-10) and mean Lysholm score revealed 98 points (SD ±4; range 79-100). Prior to ACW-HTO Tegner Scale was significantly reduced to 3.3 points (SD ±1.8; range 0-9) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and Lysholm score revealed 57 points (SD ±28; range 14-94) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) as compared with the pre-injury level. At final follow-up, mean Tegner activity scale changed to 4.8 points (SD ±1.9; range 0-9), which significantly improved as compared with the pre-osteotomy stage (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Of 85 patients, 18 achieved their pre-injury Tegner activity level, 2 even reached a level higher than the preoperative level. So the return to pre-injury activity level is 21%. The Lysholm score significantly improved to 83 points. (SD ±18; range 24-100) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) as compared with the pre-osteotomy stage.ConclusionThe present case series presents the largest published series after ACW-HTO and secondary ACLR. Clinical and radiographic results underline that this procedure is safe and significantly increases the patient's ability to participate in light sports and activities of daily living due to an improved stability. An important fact is that 21% of patients after ACW-HTO have not needed a revision ACLR due to an improvement of stability after the osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":" ","pages":"19476035251364704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035251364704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical RelevanceIn recent years, an increased posterior tibial slope has been identified as a nonmodifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and increased failure rates after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). To date, the literature consists of clinical case series on slope reducing high tibial osteotomies and reports promising clinical results. However, higher case numbers are still lacking. The goal of the present series of anterior-closed-wedge high tibial osteotomies (ACW-HTO) was to analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a minimum of 2 years. It was hypothesized that an ACW-HTO with secondary ACLR after failed ACL surgery improves clinical outcome as compared with the pre-osteotomy state or can even give sufficient stability to avoid the need for revision ACLR.Material and methodsOne hundred consecutive cases with an ACW-HTO operated between February 2019 and December 2022 were included in 2 surgical centers (57 cases radiographic/51 cases with PROMs Sozialstiftung Bamberg and 43 cases radiographic/35 cases with PROMs Sporthopaedicum Berlin, Germany). The pre-injury (before first injury), the preoperative (before ACW-HTO), and the final postoperative conditions were documented using PROMs.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 36 months (SD ±11, range 24-82), the follow-up rate for the PROMs was 85%. The mean preoperative slope of 14.6° (SD ±2.4°; range 11°-28°), measured according to the method of Dejour and Bonnin, was corrected to a mean of 6.8° (SD ±2.0°; range 0°-12°), P < 0.0001. No relevant complications were noted and no recurrent ACL graft failure was reported within the full follow-up period. Twenty-one patients had not received a revision ACLR after ACW-HTO at final follow-up due to sufficient stability. Prior to the first ACL injury, the mean Tegner activity scale was 7.3 points (SD ±1.7; 3-10) and mean Lysholm score revealed 98 points (SD ±4; range 79-100). Prior to ACW-HTO Tegner Scale was significantly reduced to 3.3 points (SD ±1.8; range 0-9) (P < 0.0001) and Lysholm score revealed 57 points (SD ±28; range 14-94) (P < 0.0001) as compared with the pre-injury level. At final follow-up, mean Tegner activity scale changed to 4.8 points (SD ±1.9; range 0-9), which significantly improved as compared with the pre-osteotomy stage (P < 0.0001). Of 85 patients, 18 achieved their pre-injury Tegner activity level, 2 even reached a level higher than the preoperative level. So the return to pre-injury activity level is 21%. The Lysholm score significantly improved to 83 points. (SD ±18; range 24-100) (P < 0.0001) as compared with the pre-osteotomy stage.ConclusionThe present case series presents the largest published series after ACW-HTO and secondary ACLR. Clinical and radiographic results underline that this procedure is safe and significantly increases the patient's ability to participate in light sports and activities of daily living due to an improved stability. An important fact is that 21% of patients after ACW-HTO have not needed a revision ACLR due to an improvement of stability after the osteotomy.

前路闭合楔形胫骨高位截骨术矫正前交叉韧带不全的斜度:100例2年随访的初步报告。
近年来,胫骨后坡增加被认为是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和ACL重建(ACLR)后失败率增加的不可改变的危险因素。到目前为止,文献包括斜坡降低高位胫骨截骨术的临床病例系列,并报告了令人满意的临床结果。然而,更高的病例数仍然缺乏。本系列前闭式楔形高位胫骨截骨术(ACW-HTO)的目的是分析至少2年的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。据推测,与截骨前的状态相比,ACL手术失败后ACLR继发的ACW-HTO可以改善临床结果,甚至可以提供足够的稳定性以避免需要翻修ACLR。材料与方法2019年2月至2022年12月,在德国柏林两个外科中心(柏林普罗姆斯社会基金会57例/51例,柏林普罗姆斯运动中心43例/35例)连续手术100例ACW-HTO。使用PROMs记录损伤前(第一次损伤前)、术前(ACW-HTO前)和术后最终情况。结果平均随访36个月(SD±11,范围24 ~ 82),随访率为85%。Dejour和Bonnin方法测得的平均术前斜率为14.6°(SD±2.4°,范围11°-28°),校正后的平均值为6.8°(SD±2.0°,范围0°-12°),P < 0.0001。在整个随访期间,没有出现相关并发症,也没有ACL移植失败复发的报道。由于足够的稳定性,21例患者在ACW-HTO后的最终随访中未接受ACLR翻修。第一次前交叉韧带损伤前,Tegner活动评分平均为7.3分(SD±1.7;3-10),Lysholm评分平均为98分(SD±4;范围79-100)。与损伤前相比,ACW-HTO治疗前Tegner评分降至3.3分(SD±1.8,范围0-9)(P < 0.0001), Lysholm评分降至57分(SD±28,范围14-94)(P < 0.0001)。最终随访时,Tegner活动量表平均值为4.8分(SD±1.9;范围0-9),与截骨前相比有显著改善(P < 0.0001)。85例患者中,18例达到损伤前Tegner活动水平,2例甚至高于术前水平。所以恢复到受伤前的运动水平是21%Lysholm的得分显著提高到83分。(SD±18;范围24-100),与截骨前比较,P < 0.0001。结论本病例系列是继ACW-HTO和继发性ACLR之后发表的最多的病例系列。临床和放射学结果强调,该手术是安全的,并且由于稳定性的提高,显著提高了患者参与轻度运动和日常生活活动的能力。一个重要的事实是,由于截骨术后稳定性的改善,21%的ACW-HTO患者不需要翻修ACLR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信