{"title":"Effect of Restrictive Blood Transfusion Strategy on Perioperative Prognosis in Elderly Orthopedic Surgery Patients With Preoperative Anemia.","authors":"Wei Ren, Jie Yao","doi":"10.62713/aic.4234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Preoperative anemia remains a common condition in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, and the choice of transfusion strategy may affect perioperative outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of a restrictive transfusion strategy on perioperative outcomes in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 782 preoperatively anemic patients (aged ≥60 years) who underwent hip replacement, knee replacement, or spine surgery at Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, China, between January 2018 and June 2024. Patients were categorized into the restrictive (n = 380) and liberal (n = 402) transfusion strategy groups. Perioperative indicators included estimated blood loss, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, as well as additional relevant variables. Primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, transfusion-related adverse reactions, and postoperative infection rates. Secondary outcomes included postoperative hemoglobin levels, readmission rates, reoperation rates, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In hip replacement and spine surgery patients, the estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the restrictive transfusion group than in the liberal transfusion group (p < 0.001), while higher in knee replacement patients (p < 0.001). The restrictive transfusion strategy reduced transfusion requirements and shortened hospital stay across all surgical types (p < 0.001). No significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the restrictive transfusion group had significantly lower rates of transfusion-related adverse reactions (1.3% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) and infections (2.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.017). Additionally, transfusion strategy was identified as an independent risk factor for transfusion-related adverse reactions [odds ratio (OR) = 3.96, 95% CI: 1.468-10.682, p = 0.007)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A restrictive transfusion strategy reduces transfusion volume, minimizes the incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions and infections. This study supports individualized perioperative anemia management to optimize outcomes in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 9","pages":"1190-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Preoperative anemia remains a common condition in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, and the choice of transfusion strategy may affect perioperative outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of a restrictive transfusion strategy on perioperative outcomes in this population.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 782 preoperatively anemic patients (aged ≥60 years) who underwent hip replacement, knee replacement, or spine surgery at Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, China, between January 2018 and June 2024. Patients were categorized into the restrictive (n = 380) and liberal (n = 402) transfusion strategy groups. Perioperative indicators included estimated blood loss, transfusion volume, length of hospital stay, as well as additional relevant variables. Primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, transfusion-related adverse reactions, and postoperative infection rates. Secondary outcomes included postoperative hemoglobin levels, readmission rates, reoperation rates, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events.
Results: In hip replacement and spine surgery patients, the estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the restrictive transfusion group than in the liberal transfusion group (p < 0.001), while higher in knee replacement patients (p < 0.001). The restrictive transfusion strategy reduced transfusion requirements and shortened hospital stay across all surgical types (p < 0.001). No significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the restrictive transfusion group had significantly lower rates of transfusion-related adverse reactions (1.3% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001) and infections (2.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.017). Additionally, transfusion strategy was identified as an independent risk factor for transfusion-related adverse reactions [odds ratio (OR) = 3.96, 95% CI: 1.468-10.682, p = 0.007)].
Conclusions: A restrictive transfusion strategy reduces transfusion volume, minimizes the incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions and infections. This study supports individualized perioperative anemia management to optimize outcomes in elderly patients.
期刊介绍:
Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.