Is Deficiency in the Electrical Current of Injury a Barrier to Healing in Hard-to-Heal Wounds? A Systematic Review with Implications for the TIMERS Paradigm.

IF 5.6 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Jenny Smith, Richard Nuccitelli, Min Zhao, Leanne Atkin, Caroline Dowsett, Hervé Maillard, Terry Swanson, Jacqui Fletcher, Harikrishna K R Nair, Keryln Carville, Robin Martin, Emma Woodmansey
{"title":"Is Deficiency in the Electrical Current of Injury a Barrier to Healing in Hard-to-Heal Wounds? A Systematic Review with Implications for the TIMERS Paradigm.","authors":"Jenny Smith, Richard Nuccitelli, Min Zhao, Leanne Atkin, Caroline Dowsett, Hervé Maillard, Terry Swanson, Jacqui Fletcher, Harikrishna K R Nair, Keryln Carville, Robin Martin, Emma Woodmansey","doi":"10.1177/21621918251373053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Endogenous bioelectric signaling (including transepidermal potential [TEP] and the current of injury) plays a fundamental role in normal wound repair. Despite this, commonly used wound management frameworks do not consider this important driver of healing. The objectives of this review are to explore whether the patient characteristics/pathologies common in delayed healing are associated with weakened electrical properties of the skin and to consider whether compromised currents of injury are a barrier to healing that could be addressed with electrical stimulation therapy (EST) and incorporated into existing frameworks. <b>Approach:</b> This systematic review of PubMed was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and aimed to explore the impact of three characteristics associated with delayed healing (older age, diabetes, and chronic inflammation) on the electrical properties of skin/wounds. <b>Results:</b> Twelve relevant studies were identified, revealing that TEP in older or diabetic people is significantly lower, and the current of injury is approximately half that of young, healthy controls. <b>Innovation:</b> Lower currents of injury are associated with slower wound healing; therefore, the reduced current of injury/TEP identified here can be considered a barrier to healing. EST is designed to boost the weakened current of injury, back up to normal levels, stimulating a healing response. The incorporation of EST into existing wound management frameworks is therefore proposed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Endogenous bioelectrical signaling in the wound healing process appears to be compromised particularly in older people and those with diabetes. Patients may benefit from incorporating treatment with EST, which boosts bioelectrical signaling, into relevant wound treatment frameworks. [Figure: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251373053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Endogenous bioelectric signaling (including transepidermal potential [TEP] and the current of injury) plays a fundamental role in normal wound repair. Despite this, commonly used wound management frameworks do not consider this important driver of healing. The objectives of this review are to explore whether the patient characteristics/pathologies common in delayed healing are associated with weakened electrical properties of the skin and to consider whether compromised currents of injury are a barrier to healing that could be addressed with electrical stimulation therapy (EST) and incorporated into existing frameworks. Approach: This systematic review of PubMed was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and aimed to explore the impact of three characteristics associated with delayed healing (older age, diabetes, and chronic inflammation) on the electrical properties of skin/wounds. Results: Twelve relevant studies were identified, revealing that TEP in older or diabetic people is significantly lower, and the current of injury is approximately half that of young, healthy controls. Innovation: Lower currents of injury are associated with slower wound healing; therefore, the reduced current of injury/TEP identified here can be considered a barrier to healing. EST is designed to boost the weakened current of injury, back up to normal levels, stimulating a healing response. The incorporation of EST into existing wound management frameworks is therefore proposed. Conclusion: Endogenous bioelectrical signaling in the wound healing process appears to be compromised particularly in older people and those with diabetes. Patients may benefit from incorporating treatment with EST, which boosts bioelectrical signaling, into relevant wound treatment frameworks. [Figure: see text].

损伤电流不足是难愈合伤口愈合的障碍吗?对TIMERS范式的系统回顾。
目的:内源性生物电信号(包括经皮电位[TEP]和损伤电流)在正常创面修复中起着基础性作用。尽管如此,常用的伤口管理框架并没有考虑到这一重要的愈合驱动因素。本综述的目的是探讨延迟愈合中常见的患者特征/病理是否与皮肤电特性减弱有关,并考虑损伤的受损电流是否是可以通过电刺激疗法(EST)解决并纳入现有框架的愈合障碍。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行PubMed系统评价,旨在探讨与延迟愈合相关的三个特征(老年、糖尿病和慢性炎症)对皮肤/伤口电学特性的影响。结果:12项相关研究发现,老年人或糖尿病患者TEP明显降低,损伤电流约为年轻健康对照组的一半。创新:较低的损伤电流与较慢的伤口愈合有关;因此,这里发现的损伤/TEP电流的减少可以被认为是愈合的障碍。EST的设计目的是将损伤减弱的电流恢复到正常水平,刺激愈合反应。因此,建议将无害环境技术纳入现有的伤口管理框架。结论:伤口愈合过程中的内源性生物电信号似乎受到损害,特别是在老年人和糖尿病患者中。患者可能受益于将EST治疗纳入相关伤口治疗框架,EST可促进生物电信号。[图:见正文]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信