Is Deficiency in the Electrical Current of Injury a Barrier to Healing in Hard-to-Heal Wounds? A Systematic Review with Implications for the TIMERS Paradigm.
Jenny Smith, Richard Nuccitelli, Min Zhao, Leanne Atkin, Caroline Dowsett, Hervé Maillard, Terry Swanson, Jacqui Fletcher, Harikrishna K R Nair, Keryln Carville, Robin Martin, Emma Woodmansey
{"title":"Is Deficiency in the Electrical Current of Injury a Barrier to Healing in Hard-to-Heal Wounds? A Systematic Review with Implications for the TIMERS Paradigm.","authors":"Jenny Smith, Richard Nuccitelli, Min Zhao, Leanne Atkin, Caroline Dowsett, Hervé Maillard, Terry Swanson, Jacqui Fletcher, Harikrishna K R Nair, Keryln Carville, Robin Martin, Emma Woodmansey","doi":"10.1177/21621918251373053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Endogenous bioelectric signaling (including transepidermal potential [TEP] and the current of injury) plays a fundamental role in normal wound repair. Despite this, commonly used wound management frameworks do not consider this important driver of healing. The objectives of this review are to explore whether the patient characteristics/pathologies common in delayed healing are associated with weakened electrical properties of the skin and to consider whether compromised currents of injury are a barrier to healing that could be addressed with electrical stimulation therapy (EST) and incorporated into existing frameworks. <b>Approach:</b> This systematic review of PubMed was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and aimed to explore the impact of three characteristics associated with delayed healing (older age, diabetes, and chronic inflammation) on the electrical properties of skin/wounds. <b>Results:</b> Twelve relevant studies were identified, revealing that TEP in older or diabetic people is significantly lower, and the current of injury is approximately half that of young, healthy controls. <b>Innovation:</b> Lower currents of injury are associated with slower wound healing; therefore, the reduced current of injury/TEP identified here can be considered a barrier to healing. EST is designed to boost the weakened current of injury, back up to normal levels, stimulating a healing response. The incorporation of EST into existing wound management frameworks is therefore proposed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Endogenous bioelectrical signaling in the wound healing process appears to be compromised particularly in older people and those with diabetes. Patients may benefit from incorporating treatment with EST, which boosts bioelectrical signaling, into relevant wound treatment frameworks. [Figure: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21621918251373053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Endogenous bioelectric signaling (including transepidermal potential [TEP] and the current of injury) plays a fundamental role in normal wound repair. Despite this, commonly used wound management frameworks do not consider this important driver of healing. The objectives of this review are to explore whether the patient characteristics/pathologies common in delayed healing are associated with weakened electrical properties of the skin and to consider whether compromised currents of injury are a barrier to healing that could be addressed with electrical stimulation therapy (EST) and incorporated into existing frameworks. Approach: This systematic review of PubMed was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and aimed to explore the impact of three characteristics associated with delayed healing (older age, diabetes, and chronic inflammation) on the electrical properties of skin/wounds. Results: Twelve relevant studies were identified, revealing that TEP in older or diabetic people is significantly lower, and the current of injury is approximately half that of young, healthy controls. Innovation: Lower currents of injury are associated with slower wound healing; therefore, the reduced current of injury/TEP identified here can be considered a barrier to healing. EST is designed to boost the weakened current of injury, back up to normal levels, stimulating a healing response. The incorporation of EST into existing wound management frameworks is therefore proposed. Conclusion: Endogenous bioelectrical signaling in the wound healing process appears to be compromised particularly in older people and those with diabetes. Patients may benefit from incorporating treatment with EST, which boosts bioelectrical signaling, into relevant wound treatment frameworks. [Figure: see text].
期刊介绍:
Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds.
Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments.
Advances in Wound Care coverage includes:
Skin bioengineering,
Skin and tissue regeneration,
Acute, chronic, and complex wounds,
Dressings,
Anti-scar strategies,
Inflammation,
Burns and healing,
Biofilm,
Oxygen and angiogenesis,
Critical limb ischemia,
Military wound care,
New devices and technologies.