Polygenic risk score and prostate specific antigen predict death from prostate cancer in men with intermediate aggressive cancer.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Leandro Rodrigues Santiago, Efthymios Ladoukakis, Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska, Belinda Nedjai
{"title":"Polygenic risk score and prostate specific antigen predict death from prostate cancer in men with intermediate aggressive cancer.","authors":"Leandro Rodrigues Santiago, Efthymios Ladoukakis, Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska, Belinda Nedjai","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polygenic risk scores (PRS) and the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test have been shown to be successful tools for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. In this study, we assessed the potential of combining PRS and PSA as biomarkers for PCa aggressiveness and subsequent mortality from patients with low to intermediate risk PCa from the TAPG-TURP cohort. Targeted sequencing of 140 PCa-related genes was performed using 162 prostate samples from PCa patients with a Gleason score of 6 or 7, 80 of whom died from the disease. An additional 305 genome samples from healthy participants of the 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 were selected as controls. Two novel PRSs were developed using 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected from those differentiated between alive (n = 82) and dead (n = 80) PCa patients. The first PRS was used in decision tree-based models, such as random forest (rf) able to accurately distinguish cancer from healthy samples (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 1). The second PRS was used together with Gleason score and PSA in an artificial neural network model able to determine the aggressiveness of PCa by predicting PCa mortality with intermediate to high accuracy (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 68.8%, AUC = 0.718). Further work must be done using our two machine learning classifiers to validate them further and apply them in the clinic, bypassing the necessity of invasive and more expensive approaches. Their application will potentially guide the clinical decision-making process and reduce costs of the clinical management of PCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) and the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test have been shown to be successful tools for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. In this study, we assessed the potential of combining PRS and PSA as biomarkers for PCa aggressiveness and subsequent mortality from patients with low to intermediate risk PCa from the TAPG-TURP cohort. Targeted sequencing of 140 PCa-related genes was performed using 162 prostate samples from PCa patients with a Gleason score of 6 or 7, 80 of whom died from the disease. An additional 305 genome samples from healthy participants of the 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 were selected as controls. Two novel PRSs were developed using 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected from those differentiated between alive (n = 82) and dead (n = 80) PCa patients. The first PRS was used in decision tree-based models, such as random forest (rf) able to accurately distinguish cancer from healthy samples (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 1). The second PRS was used together with Gleason score and PSA in an artificial neural network model able to determine the aggressiveness of PCa by predicting PCa mortality with intermediate to high accuracy (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 68.8%, AUC = 0.718). Further work must be done using our two machine learning classifiers to validate them further and apply them in the clinic, bypassing the necessity of invasive and more expensive approaches. Their application will potentially guide the clinical decision-making process and reduce costs of the clinical management of PCa patients.

多基因风险评分和前列腺特异性抗原预测中度侵袭性前列腺癌患者的死亡。
多基因风险评分(PRS)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试已被证明是预测前列腺癌(PCa)发病率的成功工具。在这项研究中,我们评估了在TAPG-TURP队列中,PRS和PSA联合作为低至中危PCa患者前列腺癌侵袭性和随后死亡率的生物标志物的潜力。对140个PCa相关基因进行了靶向测序,使用了162个前列腺样本,这些样本来自格里森评分为6或7的PCa患者,其中80人死于该疾病。另外从1000基因组计划第三阶段的健康参与者中选择305个基因组样本作为对照。从活的(n = 82)和死的(n = 80) PCa患者中分离的21个单核苷酸多态性(snp)开发了两个新的prs。第一种PRS用于基于决策树的模型,如随机森林(rf),能够准确区分癌症和健康样本(灵敏度= 100%,特异性= 100%,AUC = 1)。第二个PRS与Gleason评分和PSA一起用于人工神经网络模型,该模型能够通过预测PCa死亡率来确定PCa的侵袭性,准确度为中高(灵敏度= 90%,特异性= 68.8%,AUC = 0.718)。进一步的工作必须使用我们的两个机器学习分类器来进一步验证它们并将它们应用于临床,绕过侵入性和更昂贵的方法的必要性。它们的应用将有可能指导临床决策过程,降低PCa患者的临床管理成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信