Clinical Trial: Evaluating a Single 1600 mg Tablet Regimen of 5-Aminosalicylate for Ulcerative Colitis—The EASI Trial

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rie Louise Møller Nordestgaard, Bobby Lo, Rosalina Bergstrøm, Izabella Adzioski, Helene Skotte, Ida Marie Hawwa, Signe Krogsgaard Holme, Bermal Tiftikci, Katarzyna Majchrzak, Ida Vind, Flemming Bendtsen, Johan Burisch
{"title":"Clinical Trial: Evaluating a Single 1600 mg Tablet Regimen of 5-Aminosalicylate for Ulcerative Colitis—The EASI Trial","authors":"Rie Louise Møller Nordestgaard,&nbsp;Bobby Lo,&nbsp;Rosalina Bergstrøm,&nbsp;Izabella Adzioski,&nbsp;Helene Skotte,&nbsp;Ida Marie Hawwa,&nbsp;Signe Krogsgaard Holme,&nbsp;Bermal Tiftikci,&nbsp;Katarzyna Majchrzak,&nbsp;Ida Vind,&nbsp;Flemming Bendtsen,&nbsp;Johan Burisch","doi":"10.1111/apt.70375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) is recommended for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). However, adherence may be low; poor adherence is associated with an increased risk for flares.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether a regimen of a single 1600 mg tablet of 5-ASA improves adherence with preserved remission rates compared to a conventional regimen of three 800 mg tablets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 178 patients with UC (89 per group) in this open-label randomised controlled phase IV trial. Patients had to have stable remission on 5-ASA for at least 2 months and no concomitant diseases that could affect compliance. We randomised patients (1:1) to either receive Asacol 1600 mg single tablet or Asacol 2400 mg (three tablets of 800 mg once daily) for 12 months. Patients were assessed five times during the 12 months, where medicine was delivered and received, blood and stool samples were collected and symptom scores were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-two patients taking a single tablet and 78 taking three tablets were adherent (<i>p</i> = 0.32). Fewer patients in the 1600 mg group missed doses (24.5 vs. 26.5). There was no difference in the number of relapses or proportions experiencing relapse. Neither adherence nor treatment group was a significant predictor of relapse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The single-tablet lower dose treatment could be a feasible alternative to the conventional three-tablet regimen.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT04133194) and approved by The Danish Medicine Agency and The National Committee on Health Research Ethics (EudraCT 2019-002070-31)</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"62 9","pages":"877-886"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

5-Aminosalicylate (5-ASA) is recommended for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). However, adherence may be low; poor adherence is associated with an increased risk for flares.

Aim

To investigate whether a regimen of a single 1600 mg tablet of 5-ASA improves adherence with preserved remission rates compared to a conventional regimen of three 800 mg tablets.

Methods

We enrolled 178 patients with UC (89 per group) in this open-label randomised controlled phase IV trial. Patients had to have stable remission on 5-ASA for at least 2 months and no concomitant diseases that could affect compliance. We randomised patients (1:1) to either receive Asacol 1600 mg single tablet or Asacol 2400 mg (three tablets of 800 mg once daily) for 12 months. Patients were assessed five times during the 12 months, where medicine was delivered and received, blood and stool samples were collected and symptom scores were determined.

Results

Eighty-two patients taking a single tablet and 78 taking three tablets were adherent (p = 0.32). Fewer patients in the 1600 mg group missed doses (24.5 vs. 26.5). There was no difference in the number of relapses or proportions experiencing relapse. Neither adherence nor treatment group was a significant predictor of relapse.

Conclusion

The single-tablet lower dose treatment could be a feasible alternative to the conventional three-tablet regimen.

Trial Registration

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT04133194) and approved by The Danish Medicine Agency and The National Committee on Health Research Ethics (EudraCT 2019-002070-31)

Abstract Image

临床试验:评估5-氨基水杨酸单片1600毫克方案治疗溃疡性结肠炎- EASI试验。
背景:5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)被推荐用于治疗轻中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。然而,依从性可能很低;依从性差与耀斑发生风险增加有关。目的:研究与三片800毫克的常规治疗方案相比,单片1600毫克5-ASA是否能改善依从性并保持缓解率。在这项开放标签随机对照IV期试验中,我们招募了178例UC患者(每组89例)。患者必须在5-ASA上稳定缓解至少2个月,并且没有可能影响依从性的伴随疾病。我们将患者随机分组(1:1),接受Asacol 1600 mg单片或Asacol 2400 mg(3片,800 mg,每日一次),为期12个月。在12个月内,对患者进行了5次评估,其中药物交付和接受,血液和粪便样本收集,并确定症状评分。结果单片组有82例,三片组有78例(p = 0.32);1600mg组较少患者漏给剂量(24.5 vs 26.5)。复发的次数和复发的比例没有差异。依从性和治疗组都不是复发的显著预测因子。结论低剂量单片治疗可替代常规三片治疗方案。试验注册该研究已在Clinicaltrials.gov注册(ID NCT04133194),并由丹麦医药管理局和国家卫生研究伦理委员会批准(edract 2019-002070-31)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信