Screening Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: Accuracy of the American College of Rheumatology Screening Algorithm.

Greta Mastrangelo,Paul Tsoukas,Trent Mizzi,Beth D Gamulka,Amy Xu,Arthur Hoi Hin Cheng,Rae S M Yeung,
{"title":"Screening Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: Accuracy of the American College of Rheumatology Screening Algorithm.","authors":"Greta Mastrangelo,Paul Tsoukas,Trent Mizzi,Beth D Gamulka,Amy Xu,Arthur Hoi Hin Cheng,Rae S M Yeung, ","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nDiagnosing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is challenging, as it shares clinical features with other childhood febrile illnesses. In response to the emergence of this syndrome during the pandemic, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed a screening algorithm for the evaluation of MIS-C. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the ACR algorithm in distinguishing patients with MIS-C from other febrile children.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA single-center case-control study was conducted on children with suspected or confirmed MIS-C from March 2020 to March 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: the MIS-C group, including children with confirmed MIS-C, and febrile controls, consisting of children suspected but ultimately not diagnosed with MIS-C. The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm was retrospectively applied to both groups. The diagnosis obtained was compared with the WHO and CSTE/CDC case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n402 children (241 MIS-C, 161 febrile controls) were included. Median age was 4.2 years, and 58.9% were male. The ACR screening algorithm had 74.3% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, and 87.0% balanced accuracy when the WHO case definition was used as the gold standard; and 86.2% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 91.0% balanced accuracy when the CSTE/CDC case definition was the gold standard.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe ACR MIS-C screening algorithm demonstrates high specificity, accuracy, and good sensitivity in identifying children with MIS-C at the onset of the disease. Despite being developed early in the pandemic with limited data available, the ACR algorithm effectively differentiates children with MIS-C from febrile controls.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diagnosing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is challenging, as it shares clinical features with other childhood febrile illnesses. In response to the emergence of this syndrome during the pandemic, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed a screening algorithm for the evaluation of MIS-C. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the ACR algorithm in distinguishing patients with MIS-C from other febrile children. METHODS A single-center case-control study was conducted on children with suspected or confirmed MIS-C from March 2020 to March 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: the MIS-C group, including children with confirmed MIS-C, and febrile controls, consisting of children suspected but ultimately not diagnosed with MIS-C. The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm was retrospectively applied to both groups. The diagnosis obtained was compared with the WHO and CSTE/CDC case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS 402 children (241 MIS-C, 161 febrile controls) were included. Median age was 4.2 years, and 58.9% were male. The ACR screening algorithm had 74.3% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, and 87.0% balanced accuracy when the WHO case definition was used as the gold standard; and 86.2% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 91.0% balanced accuracy when the CSTE/CDC case definition was the gold standard. CONCLUSION The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm demonstrates high specificity, accuracy, and good sensitivity in identifying children with MIS-C at the onset of the disease. Despite being developed early in the pandemic with limited data available, the ACR algorithm effectively differentiates children with MIS-C from febrile controls.
筛选儿童多系统炎症综合征:美国风湿病学会筛选算法的准确性。
目的诊断儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)具有挑战性,因为它与其他儿童发热性疾病具有共同的临床特征。为了应对大流行期间出现的这种综合征,美国风湿病学会(ACR)开发了一种评估MIS-C的筛选算法。我们的目的是确定ACR算法在区分misc患者和其他发热儿童方面的准确性。方法于2020年3月至2022年3月对疑似或确诊的MIS-C患儿进行单中心病例对照研究。该队列被分为两组:MIS-C组,包括确诊为MIS-C的儿童,以及发热对照组,包括疑似但最终未确诊为MIS-C的儿童。两组回顾性应用ACR misc筛选算法。将获得的诊断与WHO和CSTE/CDC病例定义进行比较。计算敏感性、特异性和95%置信区间。结果共纳入402例患儿,其中misc组241例,发热对照组161例。中位年龄4.2岁,58.9%为男性。以WHO病例定义为金标准时,ACR筛选算法的灵敏度为74.3%,特异性为99.2%,平衡准确率为87.0%;当CSTE/CDC病例定义为金标准时,敏感性为86.2%,特异性为95.8%,平衡准确性为91.0%。结论ACR MIS-C筛查算法在诊断患儿发病时具有较高的特异性、准确性和良好的敏感性。尽管ACR算法是在大流行早期开发的,可用数据有限,但它有效地将misc患儿与发热对照组区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信