Greta Mastrangelo,Paul Tsoukas,Trent Mizzi,Beth D Gamulka,Amy Xu,Arthur Hoi Hin Cheng,Rae S M Yeung,
{"title":"Screening Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: Accuracy of the American College of Rheumatology Screening Algorithm.","authors":"Greta Mastrangelo,Paul Tsoukas,Trent Mizzi,Beth D Gamulka,Amy Xu,Arthur Hoi Hin Cheng,Rae S M Yeung, ","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nDiagnosing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is challenging, as it shares clinical features with other childhood febrile illnesses. In response to the emergence of this syndrome during the pandemic, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed a screening algorithm for the evaluation of MIS-C. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the ACR algorithm in distinguishing patients with MIS-C from other febrile children.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA single-center case-control study was conducted on children with suspected or confirmed MIS-C from March 2020 to March 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: the MIS-C group, including children with confirmed MIS-C, and febrile controls, consisting of children suspected but ultimately not diagnosed with MIS-C. The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm was retrospectively applied to both groups. The diagnosis obtained was compared with the WHO and CSTE/CDC case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n402 children (241 MIS-C, 161 febrile controls) were included. Median age was 4.2 years, and 58.9% were male. The ACR screening algorithm had 74.3% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, and 87.0% balanced accuracy when the WHO case definition was used as the gold standard; and 86.2% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 91.0% balanced accuracy when the CSTE/CDC case definition was the gold standard.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe ACR MIS-C screening algorithm demonstrates high specificity, accuracy, and good sensitivity in identifying children with MIS-C at the onset of the disease. Despite being developed early in the pandemic with limited data available, the ACR algorithm effectively differentiates children with MIS-C from febrile controls.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Diagnosing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is challenging, as it shares clinical features with other childhood febrile illnesses. In response to the emergence of this syndrome during the pandemic, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) developed a screening algorithm for the evaluation of MIS-C. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the ACR algorithm in distinguishing patients with MIS-C from other febrile children.
METHODS
A single-center case-control study was conducted on children with suspected or confirmed MIS-C from March 2020 to March 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: the MIS-C group, including children with confirmed MIS-C, and febrile controls, consisting of children suspected but ultimately not diagnosed with MIS-C. The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm was retrospectively applied to both groups. The diagnosis obtained was compared with the WHO and CSTE/CDC case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS
402 children (241 MIS-C, 161 febrile controls) were included. Median age was 4.2 years, and 58.9% were male. The ACR screening algorithm had 74.3% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, and 87.0% balanced accuracy when the WHO case definition was used as the gold standard; and 86.2% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and 91.0% balanced accuracy when the CSTE/CDC case definition was the gold standard.
CONCLUSION
The ACR MIS-C screening algorithm demonstrates high specificity, accuracy, and good sensitivity in identifying children with MIS-C at the onset of the disease. Despite being developed early in the pandemic with limited data available, the ACR algorithm effectively differentiates children with MIS-C from febrile controls.