Deficient Muscle Coordination Patterns of Reactive Stepping Responses in People With Chronic Stroke.

IF 3.7
Wouter Staring, Lotte van de Venis, Sarah Zandvliet, Digna de Kam, Teodoro Solis-Escalante, Alexander Geurts, Vivian Weerdesteyn
{"title":"Deficient Muscle Coordination Patterns of Reactive Stepping Responses in People With Chronic Stroke.","authors":"Wouter Staring, Lotte van de Venis, Sarah Zandvliet, Digna de Kam, Teodoro Solis-Escalante, Alexander Geurts, Vivian Weerdesteyn","doi":"10.1177/15459683251369502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with stroke often have persistent balance impairments that have a profound impact on mobility and daily life independence. Several studies have been conducted to identify stroke-related deficits in neuromuscular responses to balance perturbations. Yet, the majority of these studies involved low-intensity, non-stepping perturbations, whereas falling typically occurs at high-intensity perturbations where stepping is a key saving strategy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify deficits in muscle coordination patterns of reactive stepping in people with supratentorial stroke (PwS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 32 PwS, who performed multidirectional stepping responses with their paretic and non-paretic leg. We determined step quality, and performed muscle synergy analysis to characterize stance- and swing-leg muscle coordination patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed smaller leg angles in PwS in lateral, posterolateral and posterior directions, particularly with the paretic leg. Muscle synergy analysis yielded a set of 5 synergies in both groups for the swing VAF<sub>Paretic</sub> = 0.84 ± 0.02, VAF<sub>Non-Paretic</sub> = 0.84 ± 0.02) and stance leg VAF<sub>Paretic</sub> = 0.85 ± 0.02, VAF<sub>Non-Paretic</sub> = 0.84 ± 0.02). Three synergies were less frequently represented during paretic step execution. In addition, for the synergy with prominent gluteus medius involvement, underrepresentation was associated with lower Fugl-Meyer lower-extremity scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding of deficient synergy structure and activation during reactive stepping complements and extends insights into balance related impairments after stroke. As the key next step, the methodology presented here allows identifying whether training-induced gains in reactive step quality are related to optimization of pre-existing coordination patterns, or whether some degree of behavioral restitution (i.e., return to \"normal\" coordination patterns) may still be possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683251369502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251369502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with stroke often have persistent balance impairments that have a profound impact on mobility and daily life independence. Several studies have been conducted to identify stroke-related deficits in neuromuscular responses to balance perturbations. Yet, the majority of these studies involved low-intensity, non-stepping perturbations, whereas falling typically occurs at high-intensity perturbations where stepping is a key saving strategy.

Objective: We aimed to identify deficits in muscle coordination patterns of reactive stepping in people with supratentorial stroke (PwS).

Methods: We included 32 PwS, who performed multidirectional stepping responses with their paretic and non-paretic leg. We determined step quality, and performed muscle synergy analysis to characterize stance- and swing-leg muscle coordination patterns.

Results: We observed smaller leg angles in PwS in lateral, posterolateral and posterior directions, particularly with the paretic leg. Muscle synergy analysis yielded a set of 5 synergies in both groups for the swing VAFParetic = 0.84 ± 0.02, VAFNon-Paretic = 0.84 ± 0.02) and stance leg VAFParetic = 0.85 ± 0.02, VAFNon-Paretic = 0.84 ± 0.02). Three synergies were less frequently represented during paretic step execution. In addition, for the synergy with prominent gluteus medius involvement, underrepresentation was associated with lower Fugl-Meyer lower-extremity scores.

Conclusions: The finding of deficient synergy structure and activation during reactive stepping complements and extends insights into balance related impairments after stroke. As the key next step, the methodology presented here allows identifying whether training-induced gains in reactive step quality are related to optimization of pre-existing coordination patterns, or whether some degree of behavioral restitution (i.e., return to "normal" coordination patterns) may still be possible.

慢性脑卒中患者缺乏肌肉协调模式的反应性步进反应。
背景:中风患者通常有持续性的平衡障碍,这对行动能力和日常生活独立性有深远的影响。已经进行了几项研究,以确定神经肌肉对平衡扰动的反应与中风相关的缺陷。然而,这些研究大多涉及低强度、非步进扰动,而跌倒通常发生在高强度扰动中,步进是一种关键的拯救策略。目的:我们旨在确定幕上脑卒中(PwS)患者反应性步进肌肉协调模式的缺陷。方法:我们纳入了32名PwS,他们用父母和非父母的腿进行了多向步反应。我们确定了步伐质量,并进行了肌肉协同分析,以表征站立和摆腿肌肉协调模式。结果:我们观察到PwS在外侧、后外侧和后侧方向的腿角较小,特别是在瘫腿。两组的肌肉协同分析结果显示,两组的摆动VAFParetic = 0.84±0.02,vaf非paretic = 0.84±0.02)和站立腿VAFParetic = 0.85±0.02,vaf非paretic = 0.84±0.02,共5项协同作用。三种协同效应在亲性步骤执行中较少出现。此外,对于与突出臀中肌受累的协同作用,代表性不足与较低的Fugl-Meyer下肢评分相关。结论:在反应性步进过程中协同结构和激活缺陷的发现补充并扩展了对卒中后平衡相关损伤的见解。作为关键的下一步,这里提出的方法允许识别训练引起的反应步骤质量的增益是否与预先存在的协调模式的优化有关,或者是否某种程度的行为恢复(即返回到“正常”协调模式)仍然是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信