Prioritising the Burden of Geographic Atrophy and Treatment Expectations: A Modified Nominal Group Technique Study with International Patient-Led Organisations.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S525046
Nabin Paudel, Ellen M Moran, Sinead Stafford, Kelly McVicker, Petia Stratieva, Avril Daly
{"title":"Prioritising the Burden of Geographic Atrophy and Treatment Expectations: A Modified Nominal Group Technique Study with International Patient-Led Organisations.","authors":"Nabin Paudel, Ellen M Moran, Sinead Stafford, Kelly McVicker, Petia Stratieva, Avril Daly","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S525046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Geographic atrophy (GA), an advanced form of dry AMD, impacts over 5 million people globally and leads to progressive, irreversible vision loss. Current approaches to GA treatment aim to prevent and delay disease progression and preserve remaining vision. However, there is a debate on what constitutes a meaningful treatment outcome for patients. The aim of this study was to prioritise challenges associated with GA and desired treatment expectations from therapies using a modified Nominal Group Technique (NGT).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The study employed a modified nominal group technique (NGT), a widely used, validated, structured, facilitated group meeting to generate consensus. Representatives from patient-driven international research funding and support organizations were invited to participate. Two questions, one asking the impact of GA on patients and caregivers and another asking the treatment expectations of GA therapies were posed during the NGT session. Standard NGT methods were followed to generate top 10 challenges of living with GA and treatment expectation as perceived by the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group ranked loss of independence (score - 32/50), difficulty recognizing faces (score - 28/50), impairment in daily living activities (scores - 11 to 22/50), and mental health issues (scores - 19/50 - anxiety, 21/50 - depression) as the most significant challenges faced by people living with GA. The group also prioritised stability of vision (score - 47/50), ability to recognise faces (score - 27/50) and one time therapy (score - 19/50) as their top expectations from GA treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study successfully used the NGT to prioritise challenges associated with GA and treatment expectation of GA therapies. The consensus results imply that meaningful progress in GA care will come from therapies that realistically aim to slow further vision loss, are convenient to use, and are delivered alongside psychosocial and low-vision support.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"3317-3329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S525046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Geographic atrophy (GA), an advanced form of dry AMD, impacts over 5 million people globally and leads to progressive, irreversible vision loss. Current approaches to GA treatment aim to prevent and delay disease progression and preserve remaining vision. However, there is a debate on what constitutes a meaningful treatment outcome for patients. The aim of this study was to prioritise challenges associated with GA and desired treatment expectations from therapies using a modified Nominal Group Technique (NGT).

Methods and analysis: The study employed a modified nominal group technique (NGT), a widely used, validated, structured, facilitated group meeting to generate consensus. Representatives from patient-driven international research funding and support organizations were invited to participate. Two questions, one asking the impact of GA on patients and caregivers and another asking the treatment expectations of GA therapies were posed during the NGT session. Standard NGT methods were followed to generate top 10 challenges of living with GA and treatment expectation as perceived by the participants.

Results: The group ranked loss of independence (score - 32/50), difficulty recognizing faces (score - 28/50), impairment in daily living activities (scores - 11 to 22/50), and mental health issues (scores - 19/50 - anxiety, 21/50 - depression) as the most significant challenges faced by people living with GA. The group also prioritised stability of vision (score - 47/50), ability to recognise faces (score - 27/50) and one time therapy (score - 19/50) as their top expectations from GA treatments.

Conclusion: This study successfully used the NGT to prioritise challenges associated with GA and treatment expectation of GA therapies. The consensus results imply that meaningful progress in GA care will come from therapies that realistically aim to slow further vision loss, are convenient to use, and are delivered alongside psychosocial and low-vision support.

优先考虑地理萎缩和治疗期望的负担:与国际患者主导的组织修改名义组技术研究。
目的:地理萎缩(GA)是干性AMD的一种高级形式,影响着全球500多万人,并导致进行性、不可逆转的视力丧失。目前的GA治疗方法旨在预防和延缓疾病进展并保留剩余视力。然而,对于什么是对患者有意义的治疗结果存在争议。本研究的目的是优先考虑与GA相关的挑战和使用改良的名义群体技术(NGT)治疗的期望治疗。方法和分析:本研究采用了一种改良的名义群体技术(NGT),这是一种广泛使用的、经过验证的、结构化的、促进的群体会议,以产生共识。来自以患者为导向的国际研究资助和支持组织的代表应邀参加了会议。在NGT会议期间提出了两个问题,一个是关于GA对患者和护理人员的影响,另一个是关于GA治疗的治疗期望。遵循标准NGT方法,得出参与者认为的GA生活的十大挑战和治疗期望。结果:该组将独立性丧失(得分- 32/50)、面孔识别困难(得分- 28/50)、日常生活活动障碍(得分- 11至22/50)和心理健康问题(得分- 19/50 -焦虑,得分21/50 -抑郁)列为GA患者面临的最重大挑战。该小组还优先考虑视力稳定性(得分- 47/50),面孔识别能力(得分- 27/50)和一次性治疗(得分- 19/50)作为他们对GA治疗的最高期望。结论:本研究成功地使用了NGT来确定GA相关挑战和GA治疗预期的优先级。一致的结果表明,GA护理的有意义的进展将来自于实际旨在减缓进一步视力丧失,使用方便,并与社会心理和低视力支持一起提供的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信