Mostafa Abdou, Razia S Sahi, Thomas D Hull, Erik C Nook, Nathaniel D Daw
{"title":"Leveraging Large Language Models to Estimate Clinically Relevant Psychological Constructs in Psychotherapy Transcripts.","authors":"Mostafa Abdou, Razia S Sahi, Thomas D Hull, Erik C Nook, Nathaniel D Daw","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing precise, innocuous markers of psychopathology and the processes that foster effective treatment would greatly advance the field's ability to detect and intervene on psychopathology. However, a central challenge in this area is that both assessment and treatment are conducted primarily in natural language, a medium that makes quantitative measurement difficult. Although recent advances have been made, much existing research in this area has been limited by reliance on previous-generation psycholinguistic tools. Here we build on previous work that identified a linguistic measure of \"psychological distancing\" (that is, viewing a negative situation as separated from oneself) in client language, which was associated with improved emotion regulation in laboratory settings and treatment progress in real-world therapeutic transcripts (Nook et al., 2017, 2022). However, this formulation was based on context-insensitive word count-based measures of distancing (pronoun person and verb tense), which limits the ability to detect more abstract expressions of psychological distance, such as counterfactual or conditional statements. This approach also leaves open many questions about how therapists' - likely subtler - language can effectively guide clients toward increased psychological distance. We address these gaps by introducing the use of appropriately prompted large language models (LLMs) to measure linguistic distance, and we compare these results to those obtained using traditional word-counting techniques. Our results show that LLMs offer a more nuanced and context-sensitive approach to assessing language, significantly enhancing our ability to model the relations between linguistic distance and symptoms. Moreover, this approach enables us to expand the scope of analysis beyond client language to shed insight into how therapists' language relates to client outcomes. Specifically, the LLM was able to detect ways in which a therapist's language encouraged a client to adopt distanced perspectives-rather than simply detecting the therapist themselves being distanced. This measure also reliably tracked the severity of patient symptoms, highlighting the potential of LLM-powered linguistic analysis to deepen our understanding of therapeutic processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"9 1","pages":"187-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Developing precise, innocuous markers of psychopathology and the processes that foster effective treatment would greatly advance the field's ability to detect and intervene on psychopathology. However, a central challenge in this area is that both assessment and treatment are conducted primarily in natural language, a medium that makes quantitative measurement difficult. Although recent advances have been made, much existing research in this area has been limited by reliance on previous-generation psycholinguistic tools. Here we build on previous work that identified a linguistic measure of "psychological distancing" (that is, viewing a negative situation as separated from oneself) in client language, which was associated with improved emotion regulation in laboratory settings and treatment progress in real-world therapeutic transcripts (Nook et al., 2017, 2022). However, this formulation was based on context-insensitive word count-based measures of distancing (pronoun person and verb tense), which limits the ability to detect more abstract expressions of psychological distance, such as counterfactual or conditional statements. This approach also leaves open many questions about how therapists' - likely subtler - language can effectively guide clients toward increased psychological distance. We address these gaps by introducing the use of appropriately prompted large language models (LLMs) to measure linguistic distance, and we compare these results to those obtained using traditional word-counting techniques. Our results show that LLMs offer a more nuanced and context-sensitive approach to assessing language, significantly enhancing our ability to model the relations between linguistic distance and symptoms. Moreover, this approach enables us to expand the scope of analysis beyond client language to shed insight into how therapists' language relates to client outcomes. Specifically, the LLM was able to detect ways in which a therapist's language encouraged a client to adopt distanced perspectives-rather than simply detecting the therapist themselves being distanced. This measure also reliably tracked the severity of patient symptoms, highlighting the potential of LLM-powered linguistic analysis to deepen our understanding of therapeutic processes.
开发精确的、无害的精神病理学标记和促进有效治疗的过程将极大地推进该领域检测和干预精神病理学的能力。然而,这一领域的一个核心挑战是,评估和治疗主要是用自然语言进行的,这种语言使得定量测量变得困难。尽管最近取得了进展,但这一领域的许多现有研究都受到上一代心理语言学工具的限制。在此,我们以先前的工作为基础,确定了客户语言中“心理距离”(即将消极情况视为与自己分离)的语言衡量标准,这与实验室环境中情绪调节的改善和现实世界治疗记录中的治疗进展有关(Nook et al., 2017,2022)。然而,这个公式是基于上下文不敏感的基于单词计数的距离测量(代词,人称和动词时态),这限制了检测更抽象的心理距离表达的能力,如反事实或条件陈述。这种方法也留下了许多悬而未决的问题,即治疗师的语言(可能更微妙)如何有效地引导来访者增加心理距离。我们通过引入适当提示的大型语言模型(llm)来测量语言距离来解决这些差距,并将这些结果与使用传统单词计数技术获得的结果进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,法学硕士提供了一种更加细致入微和上下文敏感的方法来评估语言,显著提高了我们对语言距离和症状之间关系的建模能力。此外,这种方法使我们能够将分析范围扩展到客户语言之外,从而深入了解治疗师的语言与客户结果之间的关系。具体地说,法学硕士能够发现治疗师的语言如何鼓励客户采用疏远的观点,而不是简单地发现治疗师本身是疏远的。这项措施还可靠地跟踪了患者症状的严重程度,突出了llm语言分析的潜力,以加深我们对治疗过程的理解。