Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1605480
G David Adamson, Hannah Armstrong, Ying Cheong, Elaine Damato, Human Fatemi, Rui Ferriani, Georg Griesinger, William Leigh Ledger, Michele Pistollato, Antonio Pellicer, Angelina Petrova, Luk Rombauts, Tim Wilsdon, Søren Ziebe
{"title":"Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.","authors":"G David Adamson, Hannah Armstrong, Ying Cheong, Elaine Damato, Human Fatemi, Rui Ferriani, Georg Griesinger, William Leigh Ledger, Michele Pistollato, Antonio Pellicer, Angelina Petrova, Luk Rombauts, Tim Wilsdon, Søren Ziebe","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1605480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility is an underrecognized disease which affects over 17% of the reproductive age population worldwide. However, availability of, and access to, assisted reproductive technology (ART) is variable across countries. There are significant challenges relating to awareness, financial and other barriers to care, cultural considerations, and the level of support provided to people undergoing care. Previous studies have explored these challenges, but less attention has been given to the policy implications. As the need for fertility care rises, we investigate the evidence that policy changes can be implemented to improve access to ART treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of literature was conducted on fertility policy challenges and developments, covering fertility recognition and awareness; cultural and religious considerations; and access to ART treatment, psycho-social care, and supplementary care. Nine medical and academic experts were invited to validate secondary research findings and provide their perspectives on policy implications. The experts covered different specialties and geographic expertise. Experts participated in individual 60-minute interviews, then a half-day Policy Forum discussion was held virtually in May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lack of recognition of infertility as a disease, low financial coverage of fertility services, limited psychosocial support, and cultural considerations are substantial barriers to fertility services access. Some countries have limited reimbursement of services or offer only private care, significantly limiting treatment access. Others restrict reimbursement based on age, gender and family status, which creates access inequities. Policy action is needed to mitigate these challenges and to ensure timely and equitable access to fertility care. Decision-makers need to collectively recognize infertility as a disease, rather than just a social issue. Equity of access to infertility services should be ensured by expanding the availability of public funding, along with review and rationalisation of criteria for treatment reimbursement. To improve engagement in treatment and support through the fertility journey, access to psychosocial care should be expanded and included as a core service.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major obstacles to accessing ART treatment have been identified across regions globally, highlighting the urgent need for national policy action to enhance care quality by reviewing current legislation, improving patient and physician education, refining reimbursement procedures, and expanding psychosocial support services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1605480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1605480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is an underrecognized disease which affects over 17% of the reproductive age population worldwide. However, availability of, and access to, assisted reproductive technology (ART) is variable across countries. There are significant challenges relating to awareness, financial and other barriers to care, cultural considerations, and the level of support provided to people undergoing care. Previous studies have explored these challenges, but less attention has been given to the policy implications. As the need for fertility care rises, we investigate the evidence that policy changes can be implemented to improve access to ART treatment.

Methods: A review of literature was conducted on fertility policy challenges and developments, covering fertility recognition and awareness; cultural and religious considerations; and access to ART treatment, psycho-social care, and supplementary care. Nine medical and academic experts were invited to validate secondary research findings and provide their perspectives on policy implications. The experts covered different specialties and geographic expertise. Experts participated in individual 60-minute interviews, then a half-day Policy Forum discussion was held virtually in May 2023.

Results: Lack of recognition of infertility as a disease, low financial coverage of fertility services, limited psychosocial support, and cultural considerations are substantial barriers to fertility services access. Some countries have limited reimbursement of services or offer only private care, significantly limiting treatment access. Others restrict reimbursement based on age, gender and family status, which creates access inequities. Policy action is needed to mitigate these challenges and to ensure timely and equitable access to fertility care. Decision-makers need to collectively recognize infertility as a disease, rather than just a social issue. Equity of access to infertility services should be ensured by expanding the availability of public funding, along with review and rationalisation of criteria for treatment reimbursement. To improve engagement in treatment and support through the fertility journey, access to psychosocial care should be expanded and included as a core service.

Conclusion: Major obstacles to accessing ART treatment have been identified across regions globally, highlighting the urgent need for national policy action to enhance care quality by reviewing current legislation, improving patient and physician education, refining reimbursement procedures, and expanding psychosocial support services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善获得生育治疗和优化患者护理的政策解决方案:专家论坛的共识。
背景:不孕症是一种未被充分认识的疾病,影响着全世界17%以上的育龄人口。然而,各国辅助生殖技术的可得性和可及性各不相同。在认识、护理的财务和其他障碍、文化考虑以及向接受护理的人提供的支持水平方面存在重大挑战。以前的研究已经探讨了这些挑战,但对政策影响的关注较少。随着对生育护理需求的增加,我们调查了可以实施政策变化以改善抗逆转录病毒治疗可及性的证据。方法:对生育政策面临的挑战和发展进行文献综述,包括生育认识和意识;文化和宗教方面的考虑;以及获得抗逆转录病毒治疗、社会心理护理和补充护理的机会。9名医学和学术专家应邀对二级研究结果进行验证,并就政策影响提供他们的观点。这些专家涵盖了不同的专业和地域专长。专家们参加了60分钟的个别访谈,然后在2023年5月举行了为期半天的虚拟政策论坛讨论。结果:对不孕症作为一种疾病的认识不足、生育服务的财政覆盖范围低、社会心理支持有限以及文化方面的考虑是获得生育服务的重大障碍。一些国家的服务报销有限,或只提供私人护理,严重限制了获得治疗的机会。其他国家则根据年龄、性别和家庭状况限制报销,这就造成了获取机会的不平等。需要采取政策行动来减轻这些挑战,并确保及时和公平地获得生育护理。决策者需要共同认识到不孕症是一种疾病,而不仅仅是一个社会问题。应通过扩大公共资金的提供,以及审查和合理化治疗报销标准,确保获得不孕症服务的公平机会。为了在生育过程中改善对治疗和支持的参与,应扩大获得心理社会护理的机会,并将其作为一项核心服务。结论:已经确定了全球各区域获得抗逆转录病毒治疗的主要障碍,突出表明迫切需要采取国家政策行动,通过审查现行立法、改善患者和医生教育、完善报销程序和扩大社会心理支持服务来提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信